NO ONE BUT PAUL. I Want A Committment

I'm really tempted to take it one step further and promise to drop out completely. If people don't want liberty and freedom in our society, they can waste their money taking care of me. You can either vote for freedom, or enough of us drop out demanding they take care of us, the system collapses and it is forced upon them.
 
"If necessary, WRITE HIM IN! "

This, I believe, is something we may stand to benefit from if it's publicized more. Ron Paul's already tried the third party Libertarian ticket in 1988. And he's already stated he doesn't want to run third party this time, and that makes plenty of sense. It's been done- there are third party candidates every election- but they get next to no coverage or recognition.

But we should focus on "No one but Paul" in Iowa and New Hampshire and work to make it clear that we can't afford a Republican nominee who will stand for more war, more Federal Reserve, and less attention to the Constitution. Not just for the sake of freedom and the country, but because such a candidate won't stand a real chance against Obama. Obama is just that much better at selling the ideals of deficit spending (read: other Republicans, save Gary Johnson, who isn't even at the debates any more, haven't pledged a balanced budget by 2015-2016) and foreign interventionism (Romney's questionable use of the Roman quotation "If you want peace, prepare for war" in the WSJ... just look where intervening and expanding left Rome), as a matter of exceptional rhetorical ability. Obama is much better at selling these kinds of policies, and Republicans for more deficits and war can't compete.

No one but Paul- this should become clear in January with the first caucus and polls. But I'm writing in Ron Paul in the general election. He doesn't even need to talk about an independent run- I think the lack of an endorsement, not dropping out (even when the > 5% candidates do), AND supporters making it clear that they will write him in is a route to making it clear that we stand for real change. Regardless of what the polls and/or media say, I won't conclude that the lesser of two evils is in any way good.

No one but Paul for President.
 
Exactly.

The sad, dirty, hidden little secret is this: I suspect the GOP rank and file are pretty much in agreement with the leadership.

All their empty talk about the constitution is just as meaningless as the leadership's.

They really would prefer more war under Obama than peace with Paul.

I'm pretty sure we're fucked, my brother, which is why a stand like this becomes even more important.

If we can't HOLD for this, we certainly won't be able to in the inevitable, harsher, struggles that are coming.

EVERY WORD YOU SAID. I am with you until the end and then after!
 
No one but Paul in 2008

No one but Paul in 2012....

On the alter of God, I will not vote for anyone but Dr Ron Paul.
 
In 2008 I voted Constitutionalist Party; Today I can not, and will not vote for anyone but Ron Paul. Nothing else comes close.
 
I will absolutely NOT vote for any Republican presidential nominee other than Ron Paul in 2012. I am only a registered Republican because of Ron Paul.

In 2012, if Ron Paul does not win, I will either do a write-in or vote for a third party candidate...whichever move will have more impact based upon what I know at that time. See, Republican Party? I have lots of choices.

Without us, GOP, you lose!
 
I will vote for Ron Paul no matter what this time.

They bring up the theory of him running as a 3rd party because that is the only thing the media has on him that could be considered "Dirt".
 
No more worries about the strategy of the media! The seed, that the enemy is the media, has been planted with the people. IT IS THE GENERAL POPULATION WHO VOTES AND WILL SEEK THE TRUTH IN THE END! IT IS ENTRENCHED IN EVERY ONE OF US....FOR LIBERTY!!!!!

NEVER COMPROMISE PRINCIPLES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Back
Top