New York Times - Benghazi attack carried out by NATO Freedom Fighters!

[Anti-Neocon]

From http://www.nytimes.com/projects/2013/benghazi/?smid=tw-bna#/?chapt=0

Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault. The attack was led, instead, by fighters who had benefited directly from NATO’s extensive air power and logistics support during the uprising against Colonel Qaddafi.

 

[HOLLYWOOD]

Phony NTC(National Transition Council) in Libya figured the Militias would just disarm and the other half of the "green" remnants that seek revenge to the west. I guess they wised-up a bit to the US global government aka the Merchant of Death. Everyday that is being proven true with another incident of BLOWBACK.

Unfortunately, Qaddafi's downfall was thinking insurgency/invasion pockets of rebellion were Al-Qaeda when it was really US/NATO crafted Al-CIAda

 

[enhanced_deficit]

 

[Contumacious]

From http://www.nytimes.com/projects/2013/benghazi/?smid=tw-bna#/?chapt=0

Can, some then explain some contradictions:



The NY Times article claims that "a central figure in the attack was an eccentric, malcontent militia leader, Ahmed Abu Khattala,"



But the NY Times had previously reported that Mr Khattala had stated:

"Although Mr. Abu Khattala said he was not a member of Al Qaeda, he declared he would be proud to be associated with Al Qaeda’s puritanical zeal for Islamic law"



.

Furthermore, the NY Times had previously reported that :



Contradicting the accounts of many witnesses and the most recent account of the Obama administration, he contended that the attack had grown out of a peaceful protest against a video made in the United States that mocked the Prophet Muhammad and Islam.



So what happened to the previous witnesses, how come they are no longer believable?

.