New York Calls for Ban on Face Scrub Microbeads

DamianTV

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2007
Messages
20,677
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/05/new-york-calls-for-ban-on-face-scrub-microbeads/

microbeads-640x480.jpg



If you've ever used a face- or body-scrubbing product, it's likely that it contained plastic microbeads. These microbeads work to slough away dead skin, but just like other plastic products they represent an environmental hazard. For this reason, efforts are being made in New York to ban this plastic pollution from products.

Microbeads are tiny spherical beads made out of polyethylene or polypropylene ranging in size from 0.004mm to 1.24mm. They can be found in products including Clearasil, Clean & Clear, L'Oreal and Neutrogena exfoliating face and body washes as well as some toothpastes. A study estimates that nearly 19 tons of microbeads are potentially discharged into the wastewater stream of the State of New York alone each year.

The problem with these microbeads is that they are just washed down the drain. Because they are so small and buoyant, many escape capture by wastewater treatment plants, which tend to filter water through screens that have holes bigger than the microbeads.

The beads go on to act as "sponges for toxic chemical pollutants" and are mistaken for food by aquatic organisms. This means that the pollutants can enter the food chain and contaminate fish that humans eat, as well as birds, turtles and mammals.

...

More on link.
 
They dont work anyway--hemp soap all the way.

What is so damned wrong with society that we don't have HUGE distillation chamber anyway...

aiaiai
 
I hereby ban myself from buying these products. As for the rest of you, do as you like.
 
These microbeads are a huge environmental issue. But you can tell this company doesn't have a strong lobby. BP can spray oil dissolvers that are worse than just oil, cause lots of cleanup worker problems and community issues, and it's business as usual.
 
These microbeads are a huge environmental issue. But you can tell this company doesn't have a strong lobby. BP can spray oil dissolvers that are worse than just oil, cause lots of cleanup worker problems and community issues, and it's business as usual.

Not to discount the chain of stupidity behind the chain of events that caused the Horizon/Macando spill, but the oil dispersants were no more harmful than commercially available "Gunk" engine cleaner.

It was basically the same stuff.
 
Hmm . . . defeat acne or save the planet. Defeat acne . . .Or save the planet.

Guess you'll have to go outside of New York to wash your face.
 
They dont work anyway

I was thinking that too. I'm guessing it's cheaper to bottle up this stuff than natural, which probably means a more symmetrical product. Sand probably works better than some of this crap.

Cheapening any lousy product to an even cheaper degree means less effectiveness, which--in turn--eventually results in fewer customers. The pendulum would swing back in the natural equilibrium cycle. That cycle is never fast enough for the self-important and others who make these issues their religion.
 
Numbers are confusing...

Cost of enforcing this regulation few millions (or add few 0 at the end)...What is number for "few"?
Number of people using this thingy in New York? Less than a million?
Number of these "toxic thingies" that end up in sea? 1000?
Documented fishes that eat these thingies? 0
Documented dead fishes because of this product? so far 0. But some day that number could climb to 1!!!

Only logical explanation is that in future ginger people and acne people plan to have some sort of ritual where they will daily sacrifice "Scrub Microbeads" to "Sea god" to get them rid of their curse. Apparently they will cover themselves in fish food and "cleanse" themselves with "Scrub Microbeads" and then throw it into the sea"."

*this theory makes as much sense as this ban
 
So my current question is: If Banberg wants to ban these products, how did they get on the market to begin with?
 
So my current question is: If Banberg wants to ban these products, how did they get on the market to begin with?

The same way those shifty dopers skirted the drug laws initially...:eek:

This will require analog laws in regards to micro-beads, and soda, and cigarettes, and, and, and.......
 
So my current question is: If Banberg wants to ban these products, how did they get on the market to begin with?

What does this have to do with Bloomberg? He's not mayor of NYC anymore and this is being contemplated by the state government.
 
Acne treatment may soon be illegal in New York. Yet another reason leading to the theory that New York is by far the least free state in the nation.
 
Back
Top