New Republic's Jamie Kirchick ADMITS HE IS A LIAR with Latest Smear of Ron

Y

Yvonne

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2007
Messages
137
Here's a quote :
"Anyways, I don't think Ron Paul is a homophobe; I'm just cynical and
enjoy getting supporters of political candidates riled up. If you were a
Giuliani guy I'd have called him a fascist. But I must say, the Ron Paul
supporters are the most enthusiastic of the bunch! [Emphasis added.]"

Read the rest of the discussion from the beginning:
http://gays-for-ron.blogs...

He just likes to rile up supporters, eh? I wonder if Tucker Carlson will have him on again today to explain this?
 
Yvonne said:
Here's a quote :
"Anyways, I don't think Ron Paul is a homophobe; I'm just cynical and
enjoy getting supporters of political candidates riled up. If you were a
Giuliani guy I'd have called him a fascist. But I must say, the Ron Paul
supporters are the most enthusiastic of the bunch! [Emphasis added.]"

Read the rest of the discussion from the beginning:
http://gays-for-ron.blogs...

He just likes to rile up supporters, eh? I wonder if Tucker Carlson will have him on again today to explain this?
Click to expand...

Beat me to it!:D

I think with that testimony in evidence, we reeeeally have nothing to worry about.
 
Well, somebody ought to send all this stuff to Tucker ASAP!

I can't, I'm at work at the moment...
 
Honestly

I truly believe that Ron could simply say that his position on cancelling aid to Israel militarily and monetarily is sometimes misinterpreted as anti-semitism by groups sympathetic to Israel's cause of occupying Palestine. The fact that he wants to cancel all foreign aid to all countries supports this. The allegations on the comments about blacks, for anyone that bothers to research the matter, are not even close to true.

There's nothing to worry about here. This is the best the MSM has, and it's too late.
 
Here is my response to the editor, which I'm sure will not be published.

You, sir have an agenda. You are among the delusional people who think Paul's wanting to defund Israel is antisemitism, even though Paul wants to stop giving money to Arabs, who get 3 times the aid going to Israel. Paul fired a ghostwriter of the most inflammatory items you mention. There are other sources that have axes to grind with Paul.

He has explicitly stated he does not want money from hate groups and has denounced racism as immoral.

Barbara Jordan was a socialist and, unfortunately, the democratic socialist establishment has brainwashed a large portion of the black community to vote for their own continued oppression and destruction through the welfare state.

I caucused for Paul in Iowa. If he does not get the nomination, I will support Obama based on his foreign policy and his energy policy. I disagree with Obama on taxes and some of his social policies, but he trumps any of the pseudo-republicans in the race with his foreign policy. Am I racist too? You are a biased dork who has bought into the Israeli lobby. Paul is not antisemitic, but realizes our alignment with Israel is destructive.

You and your ilk disgust me.
 
can someone cut and paste the article so i don't have to give them a hit on their website?
 
DaronWestbrooke said:
This is way worse of a hit job that we predicted. These neocons are getting desparate.

http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=e2f15397-a3c7-4720-ac15-4532a7da84ca
Click to expand...

This is not 'worse than expected', this is the same old shit that has been debunked over and over again. Nothing new. In the beginning of the article he says Paul didn't write the newsletters and cites sources verifying that its not his writing style.

The rest of the article, boring and very poorly written, just contains excerpts from the newsletter....seriously, you can't discredit a newsletter in the beginning of your piece and then cite the newsletter and expect people to give a damn.

I thought he'd have copies of the newsletters with PROOF Paul wrote some of the stuff. He couldn't even provide whole passages, just tiny little snippets from a very small number of newsletters, most of which I've seen before on google. This is not worse, its a whiney douche trying to stir up trouble, the campaign can dismiss this with very little effort
 
MessyTessy said:
This is not 'worse than expected', this is the same old shit that has been debunked over and over again. Nothing new. In the beginning of the article he says Paul didn't write the newsletters and cites sources verifying that its not his writing style.
Click to expand...
I was expecting the same two or three quotes they use over and over, there are dozens of new ones and now, it seems Drugde is headlining the worst. I feel sick.
 
This is outrageous, but it proves that 'they' are afraid of Ron Paul and that 'there's a risk he might win'
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

John F Kennedy III
Newt Gingrich Gingrich-Linked Propagandist Recycles Debunked “Racist” Ron Paul Smear
Replies
4
Views
630
RPit
R
bszoka
Jamie Kirchick: "I don’t think Ron Paul is a homophobe; I'm just cynical"
Replies
6
Views
658
Cardinal Red
C
T
Jamie Kirchick: "I don't think Ron Paul is a homophobe"
Replies
4
Views
570
RickLovesRon
R
0zzy
New Republic's Jamie Discredited
Replies
0
Views
665
0zzy
0zzy
M
PROOF Ron had nothing to do with the newsletter
Replies
5
Views
2K
BuddyRey
BuddyRey
Back
Top