New Republic just posted more again

Actually there's some good information there. Where do I sign up for a subscription?
 
I dont see anything thats new in these? We already knew they contained offensive and questionable things, and they have been disavowed. All TNR is trying to do is keep up their sites activity.
 
dude, two totally different NAMBLA's I didn't know what either one was so:

North American Man/Boy Lova Association (letter)

Natioal Advocated for More Ballistics, Less Administration (video)

These are totally not the same organization

there is no such thing as National Advocated for More Ballistics, Less Adminstration... this was a goof vid to get him to say he supports NAMBLA so that they can say he supports the man/boy love... read the video description.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMupwUD8vzk&watch_response
 
Last edited:
We are a campaign about truth, we shouldnt' be hiding behind it. I think Dr. Paul should find out who wrote the letters, then ask these people for permission to release their names. If they refuse then he can release a statement saying he knows who they are put they refuse to have their names released... it's at least a step.......he needs to correct this...

+ 100000

Okay okay, I wrote them!!!
 
They've already released the most "damning" newsletters initially. All that stuff they posted now isn't that bad, for the times.

I'd be concerned if there was more racist speech, but..

The July 1991 Ron Paul Political Report defends homophobic remarks made by Tom Clancy, and cites Clancy saying, "I live in a free country, and if people want to have their anuses used in that way, while I find it unsavory, I do not arrogate to myself the right to prevent them from doing so."

..isn't bad. Replace anuses (lol) with body, the sentence is perfectly fine.

This is the best they can do?
 
I think we all have to remember that Ron Paul is just a guy, he can make mistakes... I think some people like Courtney are really hurt, because they are now doubting his whole message.

I truly believe Dr. Paul is innocent of this, but he isn't defending himself by proving it (and he could so easily.) If these are really his words. written or approved by him, I would be crushed, and probably would hate Dr. Paul more than any other politician... it would be the ultimate betrayal.

So I say to Courtney and others... lets give Dr. Paul a few more weeks to prove himself...

I suppose waiting awhile longer doesn't sound necessarily unreasonable. However, I'm afraid that expectations of full disclosure will be met with more... silence, of course.

It's really unfortunate. So, what does one do? Well, perhaps one could ask for their money back. But then, what if the campaign ignores the request, and instead, continues to remain... silent?

What are they hiding that they cannot even acknowledge a request to return a donation to someone who has requested it?

Dr. Paul is exhibiting a "politics-as-usual" propensity in dealing with these letters. If he were to ever become President, if he cannot even be open and honest with his dedicated supporters in conjunction with letters that were written under his name, then what evidence do I have that things will fundamentally change when he's faced with all manner of issues of controversy once in the Oval Office? :(
 
Last edited:
I suppose waiting awhile longer doesn't sound necessarily unreasonable. However, I'm afraid that expectations of full disclosure will be met with more... silence, of course.

It's really unfortunate. So, what does one do? Well, perhaps one could ask for their money back. But then, what if the campaign ignores the request, and continues to remain... silent?

What are they hiding that they cannot even acknowledge a request to return a donation to someone who has requested it?

Dr. Paul is exhibiting a "politics-as-usual" propensity in dealing with these letters. If he were to ever become President, if he cannot even be open and honest with his dedicated supporters in conjunction with letters that were written under his name, then what evidence do I have that things will fundamentally change when he's faced with all manner of issues of controversy once in the Oval Office? :(

I think it has more to do with small town politics vs. honesty. In Texas his campaign just ignored the scandal, and it went away, because it was Texas. Just ignoring it will not cut it on a National campaign.

You are not going to get your money back! So, chalk it up to life lesson.
 
The November 1989 Ron Paul Political Report reports on the Bohemian Grove
LOL, they're saying this like it's a bad thing. The Bohemian Grove is a real place where influential people really do gather. What exactly is wrong with stating that fact? Should Ron Paul have denied it exists??
 
They've already released the most "damning" newsletters initially. All that stuff they posted now isn't that bad, for the times.

I'd be concerned if there was more racist speech, but..

Did you see this one? It's pretty damaging and most certainly racist:

http://www.tnr.com/downloads/February1990.pdf

(Boy, it sure burns me to have a national holiday for that pro-communist philanderer, Martin Luther King. I voted against this outrage time and time again as a Congressmen. What an infamy that Ronald Reagan approved it! We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day.)

WTF?
 
Back
Top