New Poll: If Ron Fails to Secure the Nomination, How Do We Vote?

[Midnight77]

(BIG QUESTION: SHOULD WE ORGANIZE AN ONLINE PETITION TO SHOW THE POWER OF THE INTERNET ON THIS QUESTION TO CONVINCE NEO-CONS TO VOTE FOR HIM???)


Whether everyone realizes it or not, what essentially we are seeing take place in the Republican Party is a battle between Neo Conservatism and Traditional Republican Party beliefs in a game of chess. That is what this really boils down to.

The Republican Party is Hell Bent on continuing down this path of Globalism and Neo Conservatism.

So my question to all of you is this.

Say, Ron does not secure the GOP Nomination. He may run 3rd party, which after looking at his last interview after the debate, I feel stronger then ever that he will. If this is the case, we will vote for him and cost the Republican Party the victory for sure. We want to go all the way and push him to win, but if not then at least the Neo Conservatives will lose and the Republican Party will be forced to change their ways.

What we need to understand is that we should be proud of ourselves, as we do hold a considerable amount of power here. So we can make or break the Republican Party at this point and make them force their hand.

But ... what if Ron decides not to go 3rd Party? And say it is Mike Huckabee against Hillary Clinton. I want to know how you will vote. Would you still vote Republican to ensure Neo Conservatism remains the ideology of the Party ... or do you vote Democrat out of protest and continue to vote Democrat until the GOP changes their ways?

Or would you support the Libertarian Nominee?

Or do you write in Dr. Paul's name on the ballot?

This is something we probably want to discuss with Anti Paul Republicans at this point. Are they willing to cost themselves the election and put Hillary Clinton in the White House over this??? You know this discussion is going on behind the scenes with the GOP right now.

Let's discuss this. How do we show the Republican Party that Neo Conservatism and Globalism must go?

 

[LizF]

I've decided (since late spring) that I will be voting for RP in November--no matter what.

I'd prefer that he be on the GOP ballot, but if he isn't, I'll write his name in--and encourage everyone I know who currently supports RP to do the same.

No other candidate is, or will be, acceptable.

 

[idiom]

DraftRonPaul.com for the Ron Paul party? + Run someone in every seat in every state.

It would Be sweet if the RPP won the presidency, the Senate and the House

 

[GunnyFreedom]

He may run 3rd party, which after looking at his last interview after the debate, I feel stronger then ever that he will. If this is the case, we will vote for him and cost the Republican Party the victory for sure.

Why not take the position that if he runs third party -- HE WILL WIN!

DraftRonPaul.com for the Ron Paul party? + Run someone in every seat in every state.

It would Be sweet if the RPP won the presidency, the Senate and the House

Well, I for one would be strongly opposed to the formation of a "Ron Paul Party." RP would be the first to tell you that this is NOT about a man, but about an idea. Now, the formation of a "Liberty Party" or (to avoid confusion with the Libertarian Party) "Freedom Party" on the other hand........ 8-D

 

[pcosmar]

I write in Ron Paul.
Make plans and preparations for the coming Dark Age.
Survive and join the resistance.

 

[Madison]

Take up arms and storm DC.

 

[inibo]

I voted for writing in, but not really out of protest, but because there is no one else to vote for.

 

[Patriot]

I didn't vote in you poll and If Paul is not on the ballot, I won't vote.

 

[allyinoh]

Every person who has vowed to vote for Ron Paul should not waiver on their vote. Even if he doesn't get the nomination, write him in. Let's show everyone that we're serious!!

 

[Patriot]

Every person who has vowed to vote for Ron Paul should not waiver on their vote. Even if he doesn't get the nomination, write him in. Let's show everyone that we're serious!!

A write-in candidate must be officially qualified to be written in or it won't count. Also, this would have the same effect as a third party candidate. It would dilute the Republican vote and insure a Democratic win.

 

[ItsTime]

Not out of protest! I will write his name in because he is the best choice.

 

[hawkeyenick]

Take up arms and storm DC.

I never thought I would say this...but we may end up doing this if things get bad

If there is so much as a hint of voter fraud...expect it

 

[pcosmar]

A write-in candidate must be officially qualified to be written in or it won't count. Also, this would have the same effect as a third party candidate. It would dilute the Republican vote and insure a Democratic win.

SO WHAT!!!
If Ron Paul does Not win, It really DOES NOT MATTER, what Republicrat wins. We all lose.

 

[GunnyFreedom]

SO WHAT!!!
If Ron Paul does Not win, It really DOES NOT MATTER, what Republicrat wins. We all lose.

HEAR HERE!

 

[enjerth]

A write-in candidate must be officially qualified to be written in or it won't count. Also, this would have the same effect as a third party candidate. It would dilute the Republican vote and insure a Democratic win.

The ship is sinking. Why should I care?

Ron Paul or bust.

 

[USCisCarolina]

I know you guys don't want to hear this right now and we all still have hopes that he will win the republican nomination but if he doesn't get the nomination he will run for president on the Constitutional Party ticket.

Don't worry, you won't have to write it in.

 

[Wendi]

Vote for Dr. Paul if he decides to run on another party ticket and/or independent. Otherwise... WRITE IN!!! There is no other option.


Another way of putting it - this race ain't over until the fat lady sings, and the fat lady better not be Clinton

 

[johngr]

Why not take the position that if he runs third party -- HE WILL WIN!

The reason he will is because he will be the only choice to end the war. Something a majority of Americans want. If he gets his 15% and a spot in the debates, that's all she wrote for frick and frack.

 

[huchahucha]

Go vote, but leave your ballots blank for President. If enough people did that it would cause major chaos with the system. Someone would still win the election, but they would not get the popular vote - i.e., they would be in the exact same league as President Bush and there would be nothing they could do to claim otherwise.

 

[fsk]

You didn't list my option: "Why bother voting if Ron Paul isn't on the ballot?"