New And OFFICIAL TV Ad in New Hampshire! - "Believe"

FOX just identified them. Very short commentary. Said they were "confused" by it. Said one was Bill Press.
 
And I'm suggesting we should stay away from the philosophical arguments and focus on his actual plan. Ron is the first step towards true liberty, a big one, and he will do a lot of educating from the White House, and will help us educate too, but he's a realist, and we should be too.

There's a lot we don't know, but a few things we do know - Ron's plan funds SS. Seniors, who Ron needs to improve with, want SS to remain solvent. While Ron may be a pure libertarian, he isn't going to throw people out on the street, so we should stop giving that impression when pushing our philosophy in the name of Ron Paul. If you're going to educate that way, keep it completely separated from Ron Paul until he is in the White House.

I appreciate the advice, but it's not needed. I know how to play to audiences. This is the RonPaulForums; if we aren't going to preach philosophy here, it will never be advanced, and all of the new soft support we gain will either misrepresent Ron on numerous issues or otherwise never become hard support.

As an example: declare war, win it, come home. Taken out of context and by itself, that is an absolutely disastrous policy position. When viewed in the light of a non-interventionist, peaceful foreign policy, it is brilliant.
 
Last edited:
It's not too bad. Needs more Romney attacks. Gingrich is toast, don't need to waste any more seconds on him...
 
Not sure on the timing of this, and really now, how about a more DIVERSE audience....after what he has been dealing with, wouldn't a bit more of a DIVERSE audience help a little????

Also, saying he has NEVER voted to spend a dime of Social Security would let seniors at least hear, "Social Security Ron Paul". The polls clearly show the older demographic don't understand RP's positions very much(probably news watchers would be my guess), so an add targeted to them would greatly help...or we can ignore how John McCain won the nomination in 2008.
 
Not sure on the timing of this, and really now, how about a more DIVERSE audience....after what he has been dealing with, wouldn't a bit more of a DIVERSE audience help a little????

Also, saying he has NEVER voted to spend a dime of Social Security would let seniors at least hear, "Social Security Ron Paul". The polls clearly show the older demographic don't understand RP's positions very much(probably news watchers would be my guess), so an add targeted to them would greatly help...or we can ignore how John McCain won the nomination in 2008.

bump, anybody agree, or have other points?
 
Back
Top