Nevada GOP drops Pro-Life Platform

You told me what I couldn't do under that situation. I replied by explaining what was within my rights in the same situation.
No. Because "drag" and "invite" are two different words with different meanings. You explained what was within your rights in a different situation.
 
Just so I'm clear; are you implying that abortion in the case of rape is an exception to the pro-life rule you have?
Not at all. I was attempting to only address one issue at a time by saying the simplest thing I could that was still accurate. It would have been very inaccurate to say blanketly that pregnant women made a choice because it implies all pregnant women made a choice. Obviously not.
 
Figure you must be a troll due to the neg reps you spam out on any post you dont agree with.

I am not even an overly religious person and I see the wrong in killing an innocent human child .

I think he just doesn't have any rep power yet.
 
Figure you must be a troll due to the neg reps you spam out on any post you dont agree with.
I think he just doesn't have any rep power yet.

Obviously there are things I don't understand about this forum; maybe you two can help me out here:

1) How would I know if my reps have power?
2) Since there is nothing about reps in the official guidelines, what are reps primarily for, and how does one use them without being thought a troll?

Thank you.
 
Obviously there are things I don't understand about this forum; maybe you two can help me out here:

1) How would I know if my reps have power?
2) Since there is nothing about reps in the official guidelines, what are reps primarily for, and how does one use them without being thought a troll?

Thank you.

I don't think your reps have any "power" until 100 posts. Thus you are shooting blanks and the reps look different and many people think you are neg repping them. However, in order to give a negative rep, you must leave a comment. No comment means a plus rep and if it has a negative comment you should figure it's a -rep.
 
I don't think your reps have any "power" until 100 posts. Thus you are shooting blanks and the reps look different and many people think you are neg repping them. However, in order to give a negative rep, you must leave a comment. No comment means a plus rep and if it has a negative comment you should figure it's a -rep.

Under my reps section it does say "Reputation Power: 0", but why would I be able to "pretend" rep if it doesn't do anything?
 
I don't think your reps have any "power" until 100 posts. Thus you are shooting blanks and the reps look different and many people think you are neg repping them. However, in order to give a negative rep, you must leave a comment. No comment means a plus rep and if it has a negative comment you should figure it's a -rep.
Ah, that pulls everything together and makes sense. Thanks for the explanation.
 
I don't think your reps have any "power" until 100 posts. Thus you are shooting blanks and the reps look different and many people think you are neg repping them. However, in order to give a negative rep, you must leave a comment. No comment means a plus rep and if it has a negative comment you should figure it's a -rep.
So, when I get to magic 100, do my previous reps suddenly turn on, or will it only affect any future ones?
 
This is the Ron Paul guys, right? If so, I agree, esp. on the gay marriage thing. Fiscal issues and civil liberties should come first. Social issues are a boondoggle. We continually lose elections because of it.

Social issues certainly are a distraction; by design.
 
And now it's Oklahoma GOP vs Nevada GOP
Federalism by other means
How annoying. It isn't enough that she tries to make the whole state of OK do what she want. Now the Republican National Committeewoman for Oklahoma is trying to rewrite the NVGOP Platform. It seems no amount of power is enough for this statist. If she tries to touch my state platform, she is gonna have a bad time.

My platform was written by liberty Republicans in such a way so to not upset the Carolyn McLarty's of the world. Let the activists in NV write their platform the way they want.

 
Remember, this is the same GOP that as soon as Ron Paul won 25 of 28 delegates, they just acted like it never happened and tried to create a replacment Nevada GOP that all supported Romney. That was the 2012 election, in 2008, Ron Paul started winning, they turned out the lights and went home in order to, and I quote: "bring the Nevada Republican Party together".

Doesnt matter which side of the Abortion topic anyone stands on, a Corrupt GOP will not represent anyone. "Wait, profit? For me? Then I fully support / oppose the abortion issue!" Pick which ever is more profitable.
 
Whereas in NC, they gutted our platform so as not to offend our US Senate nominee. I plan to raise hell over this at the State Convention in Cherokee May 5-8. They gutted the platform without a vote of any convention, to align with a guy who had simply been ignoring the platform to this point. Clearly that is obscene.
 
Some of the platform-gutting in NC is simply to hide hypocrisy. There has been an anti-gambling plank in the platform for decades. I couldn't really care less myself, I don't think government belongs being involved in such a matter. HOWEVER, the NCGOP removed the anti-gambling plank for the first time ahead of the 2014 State convention, because the 2014 State convention is being held in a casino.

Of all the reasons for pulling that plank out of the platform, that HAS to be the worst and most hypocritical reason ever conceived.
 
Back
Top