But in the best dissent ever:
The majority's "just say no" response, like that of the Fourth Circuit before it-in effect telling Ardoin that he could have avoided violation of the NFA simply "by not possessing or manufacturing any ... machineguns"-is even more troublesome to me. I keep asking myself "why is it that each time I revisit the majority's response I am reminded of Marie Antoinette's advice to 'let them eat cake'?" Such casual, dismissive responses are just not satisfactory when it comes to engaging in an activity, such as keeping and bearing arms, that arguably implicates the Bill of Rights.
Ultimately, this view will prevail, one way or another.
I truly believe that if everyone's gun rights are not stolen in the next few months w/ the current Commie In Chief, my case (ARDOIN) will be over turned somewhere down the line. Stephen Holbrook wrote a great brief for the US Supreme Court, which they decided NOT to hear, after the 5th Circuit ruled their decision. The NRA had paid Holbrook $5,000 to write it, and they was believein it would not only overturn the FOPA 86, but at the time the Assualt Weapon Ban as well.