National Public Radio - The Declaration of Independence is racist
- Thread starter Anti Federalist
- Start date
Snowball
Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2011
- Messages
- 5,242
It has nothing to do with "racism".
What the revolution was about is Freemasonry, first and foremost. It was Washington who started the French and Indian War
at Jumonville Glen, because he messed up or intentionally fired on sleeping French officers. He probably lied about it. Washington was already a traitor. My ancestor was one of the French cadets who told him face-to-face that the French were on a diplomatic mission solely. It was Washington who claimed they were not. When the officers were sent to London, the Crown did nothing but send them back, and the level of distrust between the Masons in the colonies and the Crown was fever-pitch.
Here's a portrait of Washington in his 30's. Notice Freemasonic hand signal.
Real history is not what they teach in schools. Washington was a traitor and a snake.
Every war this country has been in, and its behaviour to natives and creatures is deplorable.
Meanwhile, Indians like Joseph Brandt were embraced and treated not only as equals but with admiration by George III.
Both the American and French revolutions were blasphemous and demonic plots.
What the revolution was about is Freemasonry, first and foremost. It was Washington who started the French and Indian War
at Jumonville Glen, because he messed up or intentionally fired on sleeping French officers. He probably lied about it. Washington was already a traitor. My ancestor was one of the French cadets who told him face-to-face that the French were on a diplomatic mission solely. It was Washington who claimed they were not. When the officers were sent to London, the Crown did nothing but send them back, and the level of distrust between the Masons in the colonies and the Crown was fever-pitch.
Here's a portrait of Washington in his 30's. Notice Freemasonic hand signal.
Real history is not what they teach in schools. Washington was a traitor and a snake.
Every war this country has been in, and its behaviour to natives and creatures is deplorable.
Meanwhile, Indians like Joseph Brandt were embraced and treated not only as equals but with admiration by George III.
Both the American and French revolutions were blasphemous and demonic plots.
Last edited:
acptulsa
Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 75,559
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2010
- Messages
- 40,047
//
https://twitter.com/michaelmalice/status/1538937915191042049
https://twitter.com/michaelmalice/status/1325936548349693953
"Being represented by a person one disgarees with is a contradiction in terms." -- Michael Malice
"There is no reason whatsoever to be represented by someone you are opposed to. Elections are inherently illegitimate." -- Michael Malice
unknown
Member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2011
- Messages
- 12,574
The passage about Indians is regrettable.
You would think that the Founders had a universal respect for the natural right of self defense.
But the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution in general has to be demonized.
Because it validates the natural right of people to exert their rights/freedom, to dismantle a government.
You would think that the Founders had a universal respect for the natural right of self defense.
But the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution in general has to be demonized.
Because it validates the natural right of people to exert their rights/freedom, to dismantle a government.
Similar threads
