Nader Considering Run-Will We Lose Any People to Him?

Laja

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
784
NADER TO DISCUSS ELECTION PLANS

WASHINGTON — Ralph Nader could be poised for another third party presidential campaign.

The consumer advocate will appear on NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday to announce whether he will launch another White House bid. Nader kicked off his 2004 presidential run on the show.

A spokesman for Nader did not return phone calls seeking comment.

Kevin Zeese, who was Nader's spokesman during the 2004 presidential race, but is no longer working for him, said Friday that Nader has been actively talking to "lots of people on all sorts of levels" about the possibility of making another run.

Zeese said he could only guess what Nader might do, but added: "Obviously, I don't think ("Meet the Press" host) Tim Russert would have him on for no reason."

Peter Camejo, Nader's running mate in 2004, said he won't reveal Nader's plans because he doesn't want to upstage the announcement. But he said Nader's overall philosophy on elections has not changed.

"You've got to keep running to raise the issues that are never discussed," Camejo said. "There's a whole series of issues that only a Ralph Nader would raise."

Last month, Nader began an exploratory presidential campaign and launched a Web site that promises to fight "corporate greed, corporate power, corporate control."

Nader's appearance on "Meet the Press" was announced Friday in an e-mail message from Nader's exploratory campaign. The message from "The Nader Team" urges supporters to tell friends and family to watch the show and requests online contributions.

Nader is still loathed by many Democrats who call him a spoiler and claim his candidacy in 2000 cost Democrats the election by siphoning votes away from Al Gore in a razor-thin contest in Florida. Nader has vociferously disputed the spoiler claim, saying only Democrats are to blame for losing the race to George W. Bush.

Though he won 2.7 percent of the national vote as the Green Party candidate in 2000, Nader won just 0.3 percent as an independent in 2004, when he appeared on the ballot in only 34 states.
 
The more the merrier I say.

Let Nader, Bloomberg, and Gingrich all enter the race.

With confusion comes opportunity.
 
The more the merrier I say.

Let Nader, Bloomberg, and Gingrich all enter the race.

With confusion comes opportunity.

Indeed. The more people come in, the more people for Ron to tear ass into, especially if McLame takes a dive.
 
There is a possibility of losing hardcore Libertarians, which isn't that many, but this is a race in which every vote counts. I say this because I asked my former philosophy doctor, who is a staunch Libertarian, if he was going to vote for Ron Paul, and he told me that he was not yet decided due to the possibility of third-party candidates.
 
We will probly lose a few supporters, but not too many. I think we all repsect Nader for challenging the two-party system, but that's about it.
 
Anything to dilute the winner's percentage would send a strong message that his/her agenda does not have popular, majority support.

It would be real cool to have a president who gets 40% or less of the vote. That would show that more people are interested in republican government.

It would also motivate the powers-that-be to committ more incidence of election fraud to get their numbers. The more fraud they commit, the more they get exposed and that will help awaken more people.

I'm not worried about Nader taking away our votes. I welcome his entry into the mix.
 
The democratic establishment will eat him alive for what they've accused him of doing for the past two elections.
 
The democratic establishment will eat him alive for what they've accused him of doing for the past two elections.

Do you think he can pull votes from Obama supporters? With women fainting around Obama, I don't know if they'll pull out and go for Nader.
 
The dems are freaking out. More specifically, Hillary's supporters are freaking out. I don't think Obama would be much hurt by Nader, but Hillary would be crushed.
 
Ya know this could be the election where a 3rd party or Ind. actually beat out one or both of the "Major" parties.
 
Ya know this could be the election where a 3rd party or Ind. actually beat out one or both of the "Major" parties.

Unless Bloomberg runs, that ain't happening. The two parties have entrenched and protected themselves too thoroughly.
 
What are your thoughts about Bloomberg?

I'm not a fan of his policies, but I like him solely for the fact that I would love to see a guy singlehandedly blow off the establishment. Granted, he's pro-establishment. But it'd be cool to see the two parties left in the dust.
 
I hear you. But when you say he's pro-establishment, what do you mean? Are his stances like any of the present candidates?
 
I don't know much about this Nader guy. I've heard of him though. Is he a good man or the average political snake? Is he pro war or anti war? Anybody know his stances on illegal immigration or the economy? Sorry but I'm too lazy to do the research. ;)

I agree that this is the year a third party or Indy candidate can win. I wish Ron Paul would reconsider. :(
 
His issues always attract an audience, but I do not think of him as an all-round world leader. As someone else said, the more the merrier. :)
 
Back
Top