Cowlesy
Moderatorus Emeritus
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2007
- Messages
- 17,086
no, i'm a private business owner with no connection to any government institution
I didn't ask if you had a connection to a government institution now did I?
no, i'm a private business owner with no connection to any government institution
here's another one of g edward griffin's videos
in this one he says that noah's ark is over on mount judi
Perhaps there's a bit of a semantic difference, but it's not that substantive of one. (Where does the stock gets its value, and where does the money come from to pay dividends?)
no, i'm a private business owner with no connection to any government institution
Anyway, dujac or anyone else for that matter. You should spend those two hours and watch that video of his.
the federal reserve act set the value of the stock to $100 per share
the fed made $78 billion in profit last year, it's paid from that
i doubt any of the member banks get exited about $6 a year, i don't think there are many shares in existence
the federal reserve act set the value of the stock to $100 per share
the fed made $78 billion in profit last year, it's paid from that
i doubt any of the member banks get exited about $6 a year, i don't think there are many shares in existence
i'd like to address the myths, one at a time
myth number one
the federal reserve system is a 'for profit' institution that retains its profits and divides them among its share holders
anyone that disagrees with this being a myth is welcome to disclose evidence against the assertion
div·i·dend Noun /ˈdiviˌdend/ listen
Synonyms:
* noun: divvy
*
dividends plural
*
A sum of money paid regularly (typically quarterly) by a company to its shareholders out of its profits (or reserves)
If you own a business then your primary interest is maintaining the viability of your for profit business. How are you supposed to maintain your business' viability if the Fed is artificially lowering interest rates causing a boom cycle, which causes your business to increase demand anticipation and causes you to over-buy inventory that you will have to significantly mark-down during the 'bust' cycle? Why not let the free market take care of investments and loans so that there is a market stabilised rate for loans that doesn't cause market forecasting distortions?
... we want sound money... not a central bank. What part of this do you not understand..
Myth's or not, it is a central bank. Our whole monetary system is credit based.
i think it's better to have stability rather than wild fluctuations, like in the 18th & 19th century
Take away the taxes on them, and I'll agree with you (mostly, at least).gold & silver are volatile commodities, they're not all that sound when it comes to using them as currency
its inelasticity of supply is the primary problem
besides, if you want gold or silver, you're free to buy as much as you want
gold & silver are volatile commodities, they're not all that sound when it comes to using them as currency
its inelasticity of supply is the primary problem
besides, if you want gold or silver, you're free to buy as much as you want
LOL, stability... Right. A stable decline in the value of the dollar maybe. Why do you hate capital savings? Why dont you want people to be able to save for retirement?