My friend's brother is being deployed to Libya, on the ground.

Vessol

Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2009
Messages
6,237
My close friend told me in person today that her brother called her last night telling her that he is deploying to Libya. She's freaking out because he told her that he might not return. He's in the air force, so I told her that he'll probably be fine because he'll most likely be stationed in Italy where our air forces are stationed there.

No, it turns out that he is being DEPLOYED IN LIBYA AS A GROUND FORCE.

 
Problems:
F-35s cost almost almost $300 million each (including maintenance).
With ground wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and more than 700 military bases, we're running short on ground troops.
Solution:
Deploy Air Force on the ground!

This whole situation is just depressing. Everything about this feels like Iraq all over again.
 
Not surprised, unfortunately. I really hope the military rallies to the one guy who values their lives and service to the country rather than use them as some talking point. :( I still think boots on the ground is the backup plan to rebel failure to overthrow Gaddafi. Of course if the replacement government isn't favorable to the US, then boots on the ground is the solution. :/
 
Last edited:
My step sisters brother got his deployment papers over a week ago, he's a marine.
 
I take back everything I said about Obama possibly having made a good move in helping the rebels. There's no way they're coming out if they deploy ground troops. One more Muslim country occupied by Christian forces (in the Muslims' eyes) -- could have been something much better - USG helping the Muslims liberate themselves. Now, it will just be one more breeding ground for terrorists. Total disregard for human life.
 
You've got to be kidding me.


What a mess we make(we as in the government, not we as in the people).
 
Wasn't there some talk about the globalists pushing Obama to gain a foothold in Northern Africa?
 
Can we get a confirmation source that I can link to? This would be a huge development and would only help our ideological position....

I've already told others, but it would help to have a confirmation.
 
thus far this seems likely as there is nooo way we could take out (exterminate) a group of people (ghaddafi) and folllowers by air and sea alone. We could but probably doesnt look very humane
 
Lies damn lies. Obama lies, Gaddafi lies...and people die. Please send my good wishes to your friend and her family.
 
Our freedom package could have a freedom nuke - it'd be for humanitarian purposes so Eastern Libya can create democracy! It's late, I know, bad joke, I'm tired, and somehow I could see Obama & co. considering it since I'm sure that "all options are on the table".
 
Don't take this negatively, but no one should be joining any branch of the American military when it is under the control of the U.N. Ill be damned if any relative of mine will potentially die for the globalists.
 
Last edited:
Did anyone read Tarpley's article? If it is true, Obama is in a heap of trouble:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=23847

While Obama’s action is being widely compared to the Bush-Cheney 2003 attack on Iraq, parallels to the April 1961 Bay of Pigs fiasco are also strong. In that instance, a force of anti-Castro Cubans organized by the CIA was militarily defeated in an attempt to take over Cuba, resulting in calls from Allen Dulles to President Kennedy for air strikes and a ground invasion. Kennedy rejected those calls and fired the Dulles CIA leadership. Obama, faced by the military collapse of a CIA force in Libya, has ordered such bombing, opening a second phase of the present US debacle.


The rebel region of Cerenaica has long been the scene of Moslem brotherhood agitation against Qaddafi, much of it fomented from across the Egyptian border with US assistance. After the failed 1995 assassination attempt against the Libyan leader reported by MI-5 defector David Shayler (for which MI-6 paid £100,000 to an al Qaeda subsidiary), eastern Libya was the scene of a protracted Islamist insurrection. In the wake of events in Tunisia and Egypt, it has become clear that the CIA has stipulated a worldwide alliance against existing Arab governments with the reactionary and oligarchical Muslim brotherhood, which was created by British intelligence in Egypt in the late 1920s. Al Qaeda of the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), another CIA front, is trumpeting full support for the rebels on its website.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy was first to recognize the Benghazi rebels, calling for a no-fly zone and air strikes a week earlier, seconded by British Prime Minister Cameron. Until about 18 hours before the UN vote, top US officials like Secretary of State Clinton and Defense Secretary Gates were stressing the difficulties of a no-fly zone. French Foreign Minister Juppé lamented that it was already too late for a no-fly zone. Then, the US abruptly demanded a no-fly zone plus a blank check for aerial bombing. Diplomatic observers are puzzled by Obama’s turnaround. Was he being blackmailed by the British and the French, the same imperialist coalition that invaded Egypt to seize the Suez Canal back in 1956? Because of Obama’s decision, the US is now at war with a fourth Moslem nation after Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan. In Pakistan, the simmering conflict is threatening to escalate into the open at any time in the wake of the scandal around CIA contractor Ray Davis, accused by the Pakistanis as a terrorist controller.
 
Don't take this negatively, but no one should be joining any branch of the American military when it is under the control of the U.N. Ill be damned if any relative of mine will potentially die for the globalists.
Hard to talk about which means it needs to be talked about. Joining the military with all the USG does now is pretty close to the most evil solution to needing a job I can imagine.

I actually cried for a while when a particular member of the forum announced he'd joined. His life's at great risk, he is doing the government's terrible work, and "representing" the US citizens using their money. Why?

Though, with the US military budget dominating expenditure @ ~50% all things included, it may be life-saving for anti-authority types to be in the military. Their equipment and training is absolutely terrifying. There may be more guns than people in the US, but only a tiny sliver of people could do anything about being carpet bombed. If the USG DID use violent force against protesters, it will be critical for the military to resist killing us.
 
Back
Top