New York's Conspiracy Against Trump

[Weston White]

There's been a ton of talk these last weeks regarding the E Jean Carroll civil defamation and sexual battery case against Trump. And certainly, it's no secret that the democratically dominated fascistic-socialist cesspool that is New York holds only disdain towards all things MAGA. I have been looking into the timeline of Carroll's allegations and it seems to point toward a contrived conspiracy. I think this should be a bigger issue then it is at present.

During 2017 the #ME TOO movement that started off in 2006 went viral.

On June 21, 2019, E. Jean Carroll published an article in New York magazine which stated that Donald Trump had sexually assaulted her in late 1995 or early 1996 in the Bergdorf Goodman department store in New York City.

June 22, 2019, Trump dismisses E. Jean Carroll rape allegation as 'fiction'.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-48727972

July 2, 2019, E Jean Carroll publishes a new book: "What Do We Need Men For?: A Modest Proposal"

One Amazon reviewer stated: "It is basically a series of stories of child sexual abuse, misogyny, sexual assault, and rape, mostly committed against the author, interspersed with stories from her road trip that are neither enlightening nor particularly funny."

Prior to, there only shows to be four books published by her:

• "Female Difficulties: Sorority Sisters, Rodeo Queens, Frigid Women, Smut Stars and Other Modern Girls" (1/1985),
• "Hunter the Strange and Savage Life of Hunter S. Thompson" (1/1993),
• "A DOG IN HEAT IS A HOT DOG AND OTHER RULES TO LIVE BY" (2/1996),
• "Mr. Right, Right Now!: How a Smart Woman Can Land Her Dream Man in 6 Weeks" (12/2003)

And while none of her books stand out as being popular or best sellers, the description of one from 1996 particularly stands out with respect to her allegations against Trump:

...The letters in this collection, taken from those sources, come principally from women who indicate that, in their cases, the women's movement has failed utterly. That many of them are sex-obsessed is hardly surprising in a sex-obsessed nation, but what is illuminating is that they appear to define themselves solely in terms of the men?or the absence thereof?in their lives. But more alarming is the pervasive lack of a sense of self; many of the advice-seekers are hesitant to act for their own benefit lest they offend family or friends or co-workers or whomever. E. Jean is hip, breezy and fun to read, although men may worry about falling victim to aggressive women egged on by E. Jean's recommendations that they get out there and grab what they want.

Around Sept., 20, 2019 New York non-retroactively extended the time-bar of sex based civil claims made by adult victims from 3-years to 20-years.

In November 2019, Carroll filed a defamation lawsuit with the New York Supreme Court. Alleging that Trump had damaged her reputation, substantially harmed her professionally, and caused emotional pain.

Noting at this point only 5-months have passed, how could any such claims be valid in such a short period?

Moreover, both Carroll and Trump are public figures under the law (having achieved "pervasive fame or notoriety") and thereby the actual malice standard applies to them both; and so requiring evidence of malicious intent (a demonstration of reckless disregard via clear and convincing evidence) in addition to: presenting defamatory statements as being factual (opinionated statements are not qualified); that those statements were false or should have reasonably been known to have been false; that those statements were made publicly (to other parties); and that the plaintiff was harmed by such statements.

Trump merely responded to Carroll's allegations by stating they were false or fiction and he did not know anything about her, etc. Such statements are protected under freedom of speech and do not rise to the level of being factual statements.

On May 24, 2022 NY signed into law the Adult Survivors Act (ASA), which permitted a 1-year "look-back" window (and permitted renewal of all prior or existing claims) for all sex based civil claims made by adult victims from 11/24/2022 to 11/24/2023.

As a side note, I believe there is a valid constitutional argument concerning the amending of (civil) statutes to alter limitations on time to effect prior violations, noting that: "The Supreme Court has interpreted the Ex Post Facto Clauses to limit only legislation that is criminal or penal in nature, though the Court has also made clear that "the ex post facto effect of a law cannot be evaded by giving a civil form to that which is essentially criminal." In addition, the Court has uniformly applied the prohibition on ex post facto legislation only to laws that operate retroactively. In the 1798 case Calder v. Bull, the Court enumerated four ways in which a legislature may violate the Ex Post Facto Clauses’ prohibition on imposing retroactive criminal liability: (1) making criminal an action taken before enactment of the law that was lawful when it was done; (2) increasing the severity of an offense after it was committed; (3) increasing the punishment for a crime after it was committed; and (4) altering the rules of evidence after an offense was committed so that it is easier to convict an offender."

* Sexual assaults, rapes, and molestations are crimes against persons that are serious and criminal in nature.

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S10-C1-5/ALDE_00001101/

On November 25, 2022 (Thanksgiving Day), E Jean Carroll filed new civil allegations against Trump under the ASA, which alleged That: Trump manhandled Carroll, "pulled down her tights", groped around her genitals and raped her; this reputedly left Carroll unable to develop sexual relationships."

Noting that Carroll filed her claim the very day this law went into effect. Also, with respect to the prior 2019 amendment, to what ends did NY establish this temporary 2022 exception, why for only this specific period of time, and why now? All this amendment did aside from allowing Carroll to file new claims against Trump was to flood the courts with thousands of claims from ex-convicts asserting that there were sexually abused during their time as prisoners in NY.

Carroll's civil claim is that:

[O]n her way out of the store she ran into Trump and he asked for help buying a gift for a woman. After she suggested a handbag or a hat, the two reputedly moved on to the lingerie section and joked about the other trying some on. Carroll said they ended up in a dressing room together, the door of which was shut, and Trump forcefully kissed her, pulled down her tights and raped her before she was able to escape. She stated that the alleged incident lasted less than three minutes, during which time there was no sales attendant present in the department. Lisa Birnbach and Carol Martin told New York magazine that Carroll had confided with them shortly after the alleged assault. [Cites omitted.]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Jean_Carroll_v._Donald_J._Trump

Former Elle advice columnist Carroll's suit, filed on Thanksgiving Day 2022 in the U.S. Southern District of New York, alleges: "Roughly 27 years ago, playful banter at the luxury department store Bergdorf Goodman on Fifth Avenue in New York City took a dark turn when Defendant Donald J. Trump seized Plaintiff E. Jean Carroll, forced her up against a dressing room wall, pinned her in place with his shoulder, and raped her."

https://people.com/politics/e-jean-carroll-donald-trump-rape-defamation-trial/

A brief overview of Carroll's background seems to indicate that she is likely a misandrist:

"She became known for her opinions on sex, and her admonition for women to never structure their lives around men.

In 1994, Carroll began hosting a talk show based on her column for NBC's newly launched cable channel, America's Talking.

The show went off the air when the channel folded in 1996, and MSNBC was launched in its place.

It was around this time that Carroll alleges she was assaulted by Trump in her New York magazine essay.

She appears on the magazine's cover in the very same coat dress that she claims she was wearing on that day in the Fall of 1995 or Spring of 1996 when a chance encounter with Trump allegedly turned into a sexual assault.

In an interview with MSNBC Friday evening Carroll, who said she would not be looking to press charges against Trump, described the alleged incident as a 'fight'.
. . .
She said: 'It became a fight. And it hurt. And it was against my will.'

Trump allegedly shoved Carroll against a wall, unzipped his pants and forcibly penetrated her in an attack she claims lasted three minutes.

She was 52 at the time, two years older than Trump, and when she told him he allegedly started laughing and said: 'You're so old.'

Trump would have been married to Marla Maples at this time, and Carroll is now the 16th woman to accuse the president of sexual misconduct.

He had also recently welcomed a fourth child in 1993, daughter Tiffany.

The White House responded to Carroll's allegations by stating: 'This is a completely false and unrealistic story surfacing 25 years after allegedly taking place and was created simply to make the President look bad.'

The essay was part of an excerpt of Carroll's book 'What Do We Need Men For? A Modest Proposal', which is being published on July 2, 2019.
. . .

In anticipation of her new book, which details her experiences with 21 men that she calls 'hideous,' Carroll has recently been leading Hideous Men tours around New York, where she stops at Trump Tower.

Other stops include the Fox News studios and Rockefeller Center.

It is Trump though who appears to loom largest for Carroll, as he was her 'last hideous man.'

'The Donna Karan coat dress still hangs on the back of my closet door, unworn and unlaundered since that evening,' reveals Carroll.

'And whether it’s my age, the fact that I haven’t met anyone fascinating enough over the past couple of decades to feel "the sap rising," as Tom Wolfe put it, or if it’s the blot of the real-estate tycoon, I can’t say. But I have never had sex with anybody ever again.'

[Carroll now lives in upstate New York, and says she had not had sex since the day that Trump allegedly assaulted her in the dressing room]"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...olumnist-shocking-Trump-rape-allegations.html

Notice the similarities in her outfits (From her 1996 book-cover and the 2019 New Yorker article that sparked her civil lawsuit against Trump):

So, Carroll doesn't even recall the date this event was supposed to have taken place; she's has twenty-one hideous experiences with men; she's had evidence of the supposed crime hanging in the back of her closest all this time, but does not want to file criminal charges--while she clearly disdains Trump; she used the word "fascinating" on Anderson Cooper during that odd interview; She brings up these allegations at the time of releasing her first book in about 2-decades--promotion scheming; her allegations matches that of a 2002 Law & Order episode; and her entire story reeks of BS: she has a kismet with Trump as she's leaving a fancy department store that happens to be completely devoid of customers and employees (noting they had prior met briefly at some event where their photo was taken together, yet when they met this second time they only knew each other from their occupations), so Trump chats her up to go back in and help him shop for a girl, where they then quickly end up inside an unsecured dressing room together within the lingerie section where Trump slams her head into a wall after closing the door, then kisses her, pushing her against the wall and pinning her with his shoulder, then pulls her tights down with one hand, unzips himself, and begins groping and penetrating her, while neither spoke to each other (noting that as described, Carroll would have been facing Trump and standing up while wearing pulled down tights and being loosely covered by a dress jacket, so it would at the very least require a willing coordination for penetration to occur), and Carroll then starts stomping the ground in her high heels for around 3-minutes at which time she is somehow able to free herself and leave the dressing room (still holding her purse and pull her tights up), to then walk out of the store without alerting anyone, instead grabbing her cell-phone to apparently call two of her friends and laugh about the crime that she was just victim to.

 

[Weston White]

Partial manuscript for Law & Order: SVU - Season 13, Episode 11 (2002) - 'Theatre Tricks'

No one here will know you.

No one here will judge you.

Strip off your inhibitions.

See carnal pleasure and join in.

Touch the world of the flesh.

The world of the forbidden.

Lust, beauty.

When love is not madness, it is not love.

Release your darkest desires.

Taste... Touch... Take...

Unleash your power.

Paolo, hurry! We're alone.
. . .
Hold up, people in the seats get to act with the actors?

There are no seats.

It's theater interactive.

The audience walks through Dante's Nine Circles of Hell.

The victim was attacked in the second circle... lust.
. . .
Your ex-wife is representing you on a rape charge.

There is no rape charge because there was no rape.

Can everyone Stop saying rape?

Okay, judge Crane,

the young woman is making serious Allegations.

Then it's a shakedown.

Has she contacted you?

No, but there's no other explanation.

She set the whole thing up.

I was invited there to satisfy her.

So where did you two meet?

They met through the Sugarbabyz website.

You've heard of it.

Wealthy older men looking for young women to exploit.

Who's being exploited here?

Either it was a mutual fantasy

or she's using my client's pension for kinky sex to set him up.

Role playing is healthy for consenting adults.
. . .
We only met that night onstage.

She said in the email that she wanted our first time to be a stranger rape fantasy.

Told me where to go, when, what she'd be wearing.

That she wanted it quick, rough, and public.

Look, she claims that she fought you.

And she wrote in this email, dated five days ago,

"if I resist, it only means I want you more."

We had a safe word. Dixie.

If it went too far, she'd say it.

She didn't.

Well, maybe because she was scared.

You were pulling her hair.

Someone else is holding her wrists.

For all I know, she emailed that guy too.

I'm telling you the truth.

Why would I risk arrest?

My reputation?

All due respect, judge,

you were having sex in a public theater.

If I thought for a moment that it went too far,

I would've stopped.

I don't enjoy hurting women.

Whatever story this actress told you,

she wants money or publicity.

Maybe she's just being dramatic.

She believes that she was raped.

So whatever he believed...

your client still May be guilty of sexual assault.
. . .
see if Meghan can explain these emails.

"I want you to take me from behind

While everyone watches and no one knows."
. . .

Okay, so he sets up his star actress to be raped.

To what end?

For the publicity.

The rape story comes out yesterday.

The ticket sales are through the roof now.
. . .
The emails that were supposedly sent by Meghan

were, designed to appeal to your fantasy.
. . .
She was more of an exhibitionist, that is.

Less of a rape fantasy. Keep going.

Lisa wanted me to break into her room, middle of the night, attack her.

She was concerned anybody might find out,

so we kept in touch.

Did anyone want to role play a rape with you

in a public place?

Yes, there was one... a bit plain.

And it was not her fantasy, it was mine.

- Okay.
- Yeah.

Role play took place

in the dressing room at Bergdorf's

while she was trying on lingerie.

I would burst in...
. . .
We know about you and judge Crane.

His rape fantasies.

You and him in the Bergdorf Goodman dressing room.

Holly, what are they talking about?
. . .

https://subslikescript.com/series/L...it-203259/season-13/episode-11-Theatre_Tricks

 

[Weston White]

Anderson Cooper transcript:

. . .
CARROLL: Oh, the best -- just like the best New York -- Donald Trump is going to put on a filmy body suit? It's like oh, I couldn't -- so he -- let's go in the dressing room. I thought I'm going to make him put the pants on. Walked in.

And the minute I was in there he shut the door and pushed me up against the wall and bang -- banged my head on the wall and kissed me. It was so shocking. I couldn't -- of course, I started laughing again. Because --

COOPER: You started laughing.

CARROLL: Of course.

COOPER: Why? Why of course?

CARROLL: Because it was a way of -- if it was at all erotic, if a man is laughed at it usually will make him -- and he put his shoulder against me to hold me against the wall. And at that point I realized that I was in a very difficult situation.

COOPER: Did he say anything?

CARROLL: No. No. It was just like we're going to do this thing, we're just so hot for each other. Why would I even try to think what he was thinking?

Anyway, so, he pushed -- you know -- he pushed me -- held me with his shoulder and I was wearing a coat dress and tights. And he pulled down the tights. And so, that's --

COOPER: He pulled them with both hands?

CARROLL: One. And that was when it turned serious. I realized that this was -- this was -- this was a fight.

And even though I can talk about it now and put words to it, at the time, the adrenaline is pouring through me and all I want to do is --

COOPER: How would you describe -- were you -- you said you were surprised --

CARROLL: Fighting.

[20:10:00] COOPER: Fighting. Were you scared? Were you angry?

CARROLL: No. I was too panicked to be scared.

COOPER: Too panicked to be scared. OK.

CARROLL: You know?

COOPER: You said adrenaline was pumping.

CARROLL: I assume it was. Because I got stronger -- he's 6'3". I looked it up. I was about 6'1" in the massive heels I was wearing. And so, we were even -- almost even in height. And down go the tights.

And it was against my will. And it hurt. And it was a fight.

COOPER: And this is not a question I would normally ask. And if you don't want to answer I totally understand. But given the prior accusations, which have all been of forms of assault or harassment, you're saying there was actual penetration.

CARROLL: Yes.

COOPER: Did you -- which is -- puts it into a different category of any of these other -- any of the other women who have come forward. I mean, that is -- that is the definition of rape. One definition.

CARROLL: That's the definition. Yes.

COOPER: How long --

CARROLL: Brief. Brief. Because when a woman is stamping her feet --

COOPER: And that's what you were doing? You started stamping your feet?

CARROLL: I always think back and think that was the stupidest thing I've ever done. I should never have done it. And then I didn't behave --

COOPER: When you say I should have never done, it you mean --

CARROLL: That was just a dumb thing to go into a dressing room with a man that I hardly know. And have him shut the door. And then be unable to stop him.

And I was a competitive athlete. So I wasn't like a -- I didn't freeze. I rose to the occasion. And it did not last long.

And that's why I don't use the word you just used. I use the word fight.

COOPER: You don't use the word rape.

CARROLL: Sexual violence is in every country in every strata of society, and I just feel that so many women are undergoing sexual violence. Mine was short. I got out. I'm happy now. I'm moving on.

And I think of all the women who are enduring constant sexual violence. So, this one incident, this one, what, three minutes in this little dressing room, I just say it's a fight. That way I'm not the victim, right? I'm not the victim.

COOPER: You don't feel like a victim.

CARROLL: I was not thrown on the ground and ravished. Which the word "rape" carries so many sexual connotations. This was not -- this was not sexual. It just hurt. It just --

COOPER: I think most people think of rape as a -- it is a violent assault. It is not --

CARROLL: I think most people think of rape as being sexy.

COOPER: Let's take a short break --

CARROLL: They think of the fantasies.

COOPER: We're going to take a quick break. If you can stick around we'll talk more on the other side.

CARROLL: You're fascinating to talk to.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

[20:17:22] COOPER: More on my conversation with E. Jean Carroll and the president's latest denial of her sexual violence allegations against him.

He said, quote, "She's not my type." He's also said previously he did not know her, had never met her, even though they had in fact met. She's the woman on the left along with her husband a local news anchor at the time and the president's wife at the time, Ivana. The president has also said flat out that she is lying.

We were talking in the last segment about what she says happened in that department store dressing room and more specifically the word she does not use to describe it.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

COOPER: Before the break, you said you don't use the word "rape." A lot of women hearing this, I mean, a lot of people hearing this who believe you would say that this is rape. CARROLL: You know, I just have trouble with the word. I just have trouble. I write an advice column for 25 years and women write to me with these devastating stories and they have been violently, you know, disposed of by men. And I just -- I feel too much respect for their suffering.

I didn't suffer, Anderson. I did not suffer. I didn't lose my job. I wasn't beaten. You know, I just don't use the --

COOPER: So you say you stomped your foot. And then --

CARROLL: And I had my purse in this hand. The only reason I know I had my purse in this hand is because by the time I got out to Fifth Avenue, I reached in to get my phone. So apparently I was holding my purse the whole time.

COOPER: Do you remember leaving the store?

CARROLL: I remember being out on Fifth Avenue. I remember going through the first floor out the door. I don't remember which door but I ended up on Fifth Avenue.

COOPER: What is going through your mind in that moment? You've gotten out. But what --

CARROLL: Flight. I felt relief to get the heck out.

COOPER: Because I don't think any guy can understand unless they've been sexually assaulted what a woman goes through -- I mean, if what you're saying is you're attacked in this place you'd never expect -- you that enjoy being in, you just -- did you think about police? Did you think about talking to friends? What was going through your mind?

CARROLL: I called my friend right away. And one of the first things she said to me is: E. Jean, stop laughing, this is not funny.

COOPER: You were laughing when you described it to her?

CARROLL: I was laughing as soon as she got on the phone apparently. I don't remember it.

COOPER: CNN has talked to both friends who say you that spoke to them around that time.

[20:20:03] And one of them says that yes, that you were laughing.

CARROLL: Yes, doesn't that sound totally insane? I guess -- well, that's how I deal with things in life. You know, to me life is a marriage of comedy and tragedy, right?
. . .

http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1906/24/acd.01.html

 

[Weston White]

Image Carroll's attorney used to confuse Trump, asking him who the woman on the left is and if he ever met her before, causing him to confuse Carroll for Marla Maples, his wife at the time:

L is E Jean Carroll and R is Ivana.

E Jean Carroll

Marla Maples​

 

[69360]

Trump brought this upon himself. He did not defend himself properly at the first trial, then couldn't keep his big mouth shut afterwards. This woman had no physical evidence and no direct witnesses. He would have easily won the first trial if he took it seriously.

 

[nobody's_hero]

It seems like in order for defamation to apply, you have to be famous. Maybe she was at some point. Not in 2019 though.

(I know defamation doesn't mean that, I'm making a joke about how this lady is basically a nobody and wants $10 million for her 'soiled reputation')

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

To think that this is the woman giving advice to females.