Murray Rothbard Was A Racialist And A Nationalist

[r3volution 3.0]

And, BTW, the kind of mild racism you find in the newsletters is Mr. Rodgers in comparison to what you find on Stormfront et al.

No one associated with Rothbard ever called for mass slaughter of particular ethnic groups, as is routine among the aforementioned degenerates.

"Blacks are lazy" =/= "Gas the kikes"

...just to keep things in perspective.

 

[Sola_Fide]

Oh for crying out loud. This crap was leveled at Reagan, Ron Paul and anyone the the SJWs could not take head on in a debate. That worked in the last 30 years. Thank God it seems to have finally come to an end!

Youre wrong. This has nothing to do with any liberal critique of "neoconfederates" or anything like that. This is an in house debate that libertarians themselves had decades ago, and are now having again.

The only problem is, that on this website in particular, there are so little libertarians left. The name of the website should be changed.

 

[Sola_Fide]

And, BTW, the kind of mild racism you find in the newsletters is Mr. Rodgers in comparison to what you find on Stormfront et al.

No one associated with Rothbard ever called for mass slaughter of particular ethnic groups, as is routine among the aforementioned degenerates.

"Blacks are lazy" =/= "Gas the kikes"

...just to keep things in perspective.

Rev,

Would Ron Paul ever call black people the "parasitic underclass" like Murray Rothbard did?

 

[r3volution 3.0]

Rev,

World Ron Paul ever call black people the "parasitic underclass" like Murray Rothbard did?

No, because Ron's middle name is honest (literally), not strategic, but so what?

My explanation has been posted above.

Did Rothbard racebait in a misguided effort to attract more people to the liberty movement?

Yes

Was Rothbard himself a racist, in a way that contradicted his libertarian bone fides?

Not in the slightest

Your title is inapt.

If you want to criticize Rothbard for his strategy, great, I'll be right there with you.

But I won't have you call into question his motives.

 

[Suzanimal]

He was the editor for years of that newsletter. Whatever statements were in that newsletter, Lew approved them. And he put those out under Ron's name. He could have been a man and owned up to his responsibility for them, but instead he stabbed Ron in the back.

And Ron Paul's name was on the newsletters. So? Lew never denied he was the editor of the newsletters. How did he stab Ron in the back?

 

[Sola_Fide]

And Ron Paul's name was on the newsletters. So? Lew never denied he was the editor of the newsletters. How did he stab Ron in the back?

Because he could have saved Ron the embarrassment of having to constantly attempt to explain the newsletters away in the media. Yet Lew refused.

Its partly because he unapologetically holds these racist feelings in his heart, and partly because of his defective character. He could have helped Ron when Ron needed him the most, and he didn't.

 

[Influenza]

Right....because you know more than Ron Paul's own chief of staff.

Sometimes your posts are ridiculous....yet you sound so confident in your ridiculousness.

LOL that's really rich coming from the guy who repeatedly argued that a RPF member was a pedophile for being sexually attracted to 18/19 year old women

 

[Sola_Fide]

LOL that's really rich coming from the guy who repeatedly argued that a RPF member was a pedophile for being sexually attracted to 18/19 year old women

Who did that? Me? I don't remember doing that. Well, depending on the circumstances, I think I still agree. Where is the post?

 

[Suzanimal]

Because he could have saved Ron the embarrassment of having to constantly attempt to explain the newsletters away in the media. Yet Lew refused.

Its partly because he unapologetically holds these racist feelings in his heart, and partly because of his defective character. He could have helped Ron when Ron needed him the most, and he didn't.

OR, maybe Ron asked him to let him handle it? I don't know. You don't know. You're making an awful lot of assumptions about someone you don't even know.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Rev,

Would Ron Paul ever call black people the "parasitic underclass" like Murray Rothbard did?

Is there a parasitic underclass?

 

[Anti Federalist]

It has to do with the culture warrior mindset, which the Roman Catholic church endorses. It always translates into state action.

Zuh?

 

[Sola_Fide]

Is there a parasitic underclass?

Yes there is. Murray Rothbard said black people were the parasitic underclass. Do you agree? I don't. The statement itself is ignorant, racist, and completely refuted by the facts. I live in rural Indiana and the parasitic underclass here are white meth heads.

 

[Sola_Fide]

Zuh?

The Roman Catholic Church endorses state legislated morality. Read the Catholic Catechism. You guys are acting like I'm saying something just completely out of left field, when you can Google the catechism and read it for yourselves.

 

[Sola_Fide]

OR, maybe Ron asked him to let him handle it? I don't know. You don't know. You're making an awful lot of assumptions about someone you don't even know.

You're right. I don't know Lew. That is why in this thread I quoted Ron Paul's chief of staff who knew Lew and had intimate details of the entire situation. I take that over anyone here who doesn't know him either.

 

[Occam's Banana]

Go to Stormfront.org and put "Rothbard" in the search box. You'll never look at Rothbard the same.

Oh, come on! Really? You're actually citing Stormfart as an authoritative source for ... well, for anything?

What's next? Are you going to join the "Mises was a racist" crowd, too? (That's another Stormfarter claim, BTW.)

Seriously - you need to get that Lew Rockwell hate-bug out of your nose. It's eating your brain ...

And you still haven't explained how those two sentences (or anything else) from the quotes in your OP demonstrate Rothbard to be an advocate of "racialist" secessionism.

 

[Anti Federalist]

The Roman Catholic Church endorses state legislated morality. Read the Catholic Catechism. You guys are acting like I'm saying something just completely out of left field, when you can Google the catechism and read it for yourselves.

It sounds out of left field given the church's past, and I am not Catholic so I have not read the catechism.

 

[Suzanimal]

The Roman Catholic Church endorses state legislated morality. Read the Catholic Catechism. You guys are acting like I'm saying something just completely out of left field, when you can Google the catechism and read it for yourselves.

Legislation is always based on someone's morality.

 

[Suzanimal]

It sounds out of left field given the church's past, and I am not Catholic so I have not read the catechism.

I have. Many years ago but I don't recall what he's referring to. I'm saying it's not there, I just don't remember it.

 

[Sola_Fide]

Oh, come on! Really? You're actually citing Stormfart as an authoritative source for ... well, for anything?

What's next? Are you going to join the "Mises was a racist" crowd, too? (That's another Stormfarter claim, BTW.)

Seriously - you need to get that Lew Rockwell hate-bug out of your nose. It's eating your brain ...

And you still haven't explained how those two sentences (or anything else) from the quotes in your OP demonstrate Rothbard to be an advocate of "racialist" secessionism.

Read this awesome thread:

Ludwig Von Mises Was Racially Aware
https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t735928/

 

[Anti Federalist]

Yes there is. Murray Rothbard said black people were the parasitic underclass. Do you agree? I don't. The statement itself is ignorant, racist, and completely refuted by the facts. I live in rural Indiana and the parasitic underclass here are white meth heads.

What facts?

A quick search indicates that blacks participate in government assistance programs at a rate over three times that of whites.

The black population: At 41.6 percent, blacks were more likely to participate in government assistance programs in an average month.

o The black participation rate was followed by Hispanics at 36.4 percent, Asians or Pacific
Islanders at 17.8 percent, and non-Hispanic whites at 13.2 percent.

http://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2015/cb15-97.html

The reasons for that are debatable and numerous.

But the fact is that there is a parasitic underclass and that blacks comprise a percentage of that over three times that which raw population percentages would suggest.