MT-SWAT grenades home, make no arrests and badly burn 12 year old girl in the process.

Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
117,717
Sometimes, I just don't know what to say...

I mean, is there anybody left that buys this "land of the free" bullshit anymore?

If there are, I'm here to tell you, when government randomly grenades homes and kills people, you ain't living in a free country anymore.

Get a fucking rope...:mad:



Grenade burns sleeping girl as SWAT team raids Billings home

http://missoulian.com/news/state-an...cle_71d1f226-1474-11e2-b4b4-0019bb2963f4.html

12 Oct. 2012

50782231bfe9e.preview-620.jpg


A 12-year-old girl suffered burns to one side of her body when a flash grenade went off next to her as a police SWAT team raided a West End home Tuesday morning.

"She has first- and second-degree burns down the left side of her body and on her arms," said the girl's mother, Jackie Fasching. "She's got severe pain. Every time I think about it, it brings tears to my eyes."

Medical staff at the scene tended to the girl afterward and then her mother drove her to the hospital, where she was treated and released later that day.

A photo of the girl provided by Fasching to The Gazette shows red and black burns on her side.

Police Chief Rich St. John said the 6 a.m. raid at 2128 Custer Ave., was to execute a search warrant as part of an ongoing narcotics investigation by the City-County Special Investigations Unit.

The grenade is commonly called a "flash-bang" and is used to disorient people with a bright flash, a loud bang and a concussive blast. It went off on the floor where the girl was sleeping. She was in her sister's bedroom near the window the grenade came through, Fasching said.

A SWAT member attached it to a boomstick, a metal pole that detonates the grenade, and stuck it through the bedroom window. St. John said the grenade normally stays on the boomstick so it goes off in a controlled manner at a higher level.

However, the officer didn't realize that there was a delay on the grenade when he tried to detonate it. He dropped it to move onto a new device, St. John said. The grenade fell to the floor and went off near the girl.

"It was totally unforeseen, totally unplanned and extremely regrettable," St. John said. "We certainly did not want a juvenile, or anyone else for that matter, to get injured."

On Thursday, Fasching took her daughter back to the hospital to have her wounds treated.

She questioned why police would take such actions with children in the home and why it needed a SWAT team.

"A simple knock on the door and I would've let them in," she said. "They said their intel told them there was a meth lab at our house. If they would've checked, they would've known there's not."

She and her two daughters and her husband were home at the time of the raid. She said her husband, who suffers from congenital heart disease and liver failure, told officers he would open the front door as the raid began and was opening it as they knocked it down.

When the grenade went off in the room, it left a large bowl-shaped dent in the wall and "blew the nails out of the drywall," Fasching said.

St. John said investigators did plenty of homework on the residence before deciding to launch the raid but didn't know children were inside.

"The information that we had did not have any juveniles in the house and did not have any juveniles in the room," he said. "We generally do not introduce these disorienting devices when they're present."

The decision to use a SWAT team was based on a detailed checklist the department uses when serving warrants.

Investigators consider dozens of items such as residents' past criminal convictions, other criminal history, mental illness and previous interactions with law enforcement.

Each item is assigned a point value and if the total exceeds a certain threshold, SWAT is requested. Then a commander approves or rejects the request.

In Tuesday's raid, the points exceeded the threshold and investigators called in SWAT.

"Every bit of information and intelligence that we have comes together and we determine what kind of risk is there," St. John said. "The warrant was based on some hard evidence and everything we knew at the time."

But Fasching said the risk wasn't there and the entry created, for her and her daughters, a sense of fear they can't shake.

"I'm going to have to take them to counseling," she said. "They're never going to get over that."

A claims process has already been started with the city. St. John said it's not an overnight process, but it does determine if the Police Department needs to make restitution.

"If we're wrong or made a mistake, then we're going to take care of it," he said. "But if it determines we're not, then we'll go with that. When we do this, we want to ensure the safety of not only the officers, but the residents inside."

No arrests were made during the raid and no charges have been filed, although a police spokesman said afterward that some evidence was recovered during the search. St. John declined to release specifics of the drug case, citing the active investigation, but did say that "activity was significant enough where our drug unit requested a search warrant."

Fasching said she's considering legal action but, for now, is more concerned about her daughters.

"I would like to see whoever threw those grenades in my daughter's room be reprimanded," she said. "If anybody else did that it would be aggravated assault. I just want to see that the city is held accountable for what they did to my children."
 
Last edited:
Investigators consider dozens of items such as residents' past criminal convictions, other criminal history, mental illness and previous interactions with law enforcement.

Each item is assigned a point value and if the total exceeds a certain threshold, SWAT is requested. Then a commander approves or rejects the request.

So what? Let's say 10 counts of weed possession gets 10 points and if that's over the 'threshold', then I guess they just fucking nuke the place.

We can we stop reading stories about this shit and start running for mayor or sheriff and firing these asshole cops?
 
Last edited:
Saw that at reason. Thread winners:

fish: So in other words these "Barneys" are trusted with light duty explosives and automatic weapons but in a statistically significant number of cases lack the reading comprehension or basic police skills to find the proper house/potential crime scene?

tarran: Meth labs are full of toxic, flammable chemicals.

Yeah, just the place to toss a fucking grenade....

Rasilio: Wait a minute, they believed that the house was hiding a Meth lab, places notorious for blowing themselves up because the quantity of flamabile chemicals and their tendency to spread them all over the place and they tossed in an explosive device?

What they hell were they trying to do, blow up half the friggin block?

ETA:
So they think it's wise to throw grenades into a house that they suspect has a meth lab? Sounds to me like they wanted to burn up everyone inside.

Another winner.
 
Last edited:
"A simple knock on the door and I would've let them in," she said. "They said their intel told them there was a meth lab at our house. If they would've checked, they would've known there's not."
So they think it's wise to throw grenades into a house that they suspect has a meth lab? Sounds to me like they wanted to burn up everyone inside.
Exactly my thoughts. Insanity.
 
Those combating drugs are far worse than the what they believe they are combating.
 
Saw that at reason. Thread winners:

fish: So in other words these "Barneys" are trusted with light duty explosives and automatic weapons but in a statistically significant number of cases lack the reading comprehension or basic police skills to find the proper house/potential crime scene?

tarran: Meth labs are full of toxic, flammable chemicals.

Yeah, just the place to toss a fucking grenade....

Rasilio: Wait a minute, they believed that the house was hiding a Meth lab, places notorious for blowing themselves up because the quantity of flamabile chemicals and their tendency to spread them all over the place and they tossed in an explosive device?

What they hell were they trying to do, blow up half the friggin block?

My thoughts exactly. That's like throwing a fireball into an organic chem lab.
 
From The Agitator:

#6 | MassHole | October 12th, 2012 at 1:46 pm
Someone should lob a few flash bangs through the Chief’s window. Bet he wouldn’t be so laid back about it if it was his kid that got burned. The War on Drugs. It’s for the children right?
 
I like this quote: "It was totally unforeseen, totally unplanned and extremely regrettable," St. John said.

Well, sure the part about blindly jamming a grenade on a pole through someone's bedroom window in the middle of the night - that part was planned. Not very well planned, perhaps, but there WAS a plan. It was the part about there being a human being inside that was TOTALLY unforseeable. I mean who could even imagine that sort of thing?
 
My law enforcement teacher back when I was in highschool mentioned how he was on the CA, Riverside SWAT team. They threw a flash grenade into a room and there was a person on the bed of that room. The grenade fell onto the side of the bed. When the person heard and realize what was going on, he rolled over to the side of the bed and landed right on the grenade. The person died when the flash grenade went off under him.
 
Balko at The Agitator checks in:


Another Isolated Incident

Friday, October 12th, 2012

http://www.theagitator.com/2012/10/12/another-isolated-incident-53/

Montana SWAT team drops a flash grenade through a window into a bedroom where two children are sleeping. No arrests. No alleged meth lab.

A 12-year-old girl suffered burns to one side of her body when a flash grenade went off next to her as a police SWAT team raided a West End home Tuesday morning.

“She has first- and second-degree burns down the left side of her body and on her arms,” said the girl’s mother, Jackie Fasching. “She’s got severe pain. Every time I think about it, it brings tears to my eyes.”

Medical staff at the scene tended to the girl afterward and then her mother drove her to the hospital, where she was treated and released later that day.

A photo of the girl provided by Fasching to The Gazette shows red and black burns on her side.

Police Chief Rich St. John said the 6 a.m. raid at 2128 Custer Ave., was to execute a search warrant as part of an ongoing narcotics investigation by the City-County Special Investigations Unit . . .

“It was totally unforeseen, totally unplanned and extremely regrettable,” St. John said. “We certainly did not want a juvenile, or anyone else for that matter, to get injured.”

Well, I’ll give him unplanned. Though I don’t think he meant it in the way I mean it. Sorry, but when you’re blindly shoving a flash grenade attached to a boomstick through a window, and you clearly have no idea who or what is in that room where you’re detonating, the possibility that an innocence person might get burned is not “totally unforeseen.” It’s only unforeseen when you’re so caught up in your drug war that you can’t be bothered to take the time to consider the possible collateral damage your actions may cause.

On Thursday, Fasching took her daughter back to the hospital to have her wounds treated.

She questioned why police would take such actions with children in the home and why it needed a SWAT team.

“A simple knock on the door and I would’ve let them in,” she said. “They said their intel told them there was a meth lab at our house. If they would’ve checked, they would’ve known there’s not.”

She and her two daughters and her husband were home at the time of the raid. She said her husband, who suffers from congenital heart disease and liver failure, told officers he would open the front door as the raid began and was opening it as they knocked it down.

When the grenade went off in the room, it left a large bowl-shaped dent in the wall and “blew the nails out of the drywall,” Fasching said.

St. John said investigators did plenty of homework on the residence before deciding to launch the raid but didn’t know children were inside.

“The information that we had did not have any juveniles in the house and did not have any juveniles in the room,” he said. “We generally do not introduce these disorienting devices when they’re present.”

I’ve probably read about more than a thousand of these raids by now. The cognitive dissonance still astounds me. No, Chief St. John, if you did not know there were two children in the home, if you did not know that you were dropping a flash grenade into a child’s bedroom, you pretty clearly did not do “plenty” of goddamned “homework.”

(Not to mention, as many have already pointed out, the idea of tossing an explosive incendiary device into a closed home that you think contains a meth lab. - AF)

Investigators consider dozens of items such as residents’ past criminal convictions, other criminal history, mental illness and previous interactions with law enforcement.

Each item is assigned a point value and if the total exceeds a certain threshold, SWAT is requested. Then a commander approves or rejects the request.

In Tuesday’s raid, the points exceeded the threshold and investigators called in SWAT.

“Every bit of information and intelligence that we have comes together and we determine what kind of risk is there,” St. John said. “The warrant was based on some hard evidence and everything we knew at the time.”

Sounds awfully professional, doesn’t it? Except that they were looking for a meth lab, and pretty clearly didn’t find it. I mean, unless the Faschings recently had their house fumigated by Vamonos Pest Control, a meth lab isn’t something you can easily pick up and move.

“If we’re wrong or made a mistake, then we’re going to take care of it,” he said. “But if it determines we’re not, then we’ll go with that. When we do this, we want to ensure the safety of not only the officers, but the residents inside.”

The last four words are self-evidently complete and utter crap. And sure. Let’s go ahead and entrust the same department that just carried out this debacle after doing “plenty of homework” to investigate itself to determine if it did anything wrong. That sounds like a perfectly fair, impartial way to treat the Faschings.
 
40 years of drug war failure.

40Years0fDrugWarFailure.jpg

Where did you get that chart? I see the web address with it but it only pulls the chart itself. I was wondering if there was an article to go with it or any type of supporting documentation? They say numbers don't lie...holy crap!!
 
If they did all of this so-called "checking" to determine there might be a meth lab inside the house, what level of stupid calls for the detonation of a flash-band grenade?

Cops talk about officer safety? Setting off a device like that if there was a meth lab would have been officer suicide.
 
Where did you get that chart? I see the web address with it but it only pulls the chart itself. I was wondering if there was an article to go with it or any type of supporting documentation? They say numbers don't lie...holy crap!!

http://reason.com/blog/2012/10/11/forty-years-of-drug-war-failure-in-a-sin

Via Drugsnotthugs.com and Reason's own Cynthia Bell.

UPDATE: A reader points out that the dollar amounts on the right Y axis don't add up to $1.5 trillion. The creator of the chart, documentary filmmaker Matt Groff, Tweeted the following in response to a question about where the $1.5 trillion figure comes from: "Short answer: chart shows only fed drug control, $1.5T refers to all costs assoc. w/ drug prohibition, blog on it shortly."

First off, I take the blame for not seeing the discrepancy. Shame on me.

But here's the funny thing: While the $1.5 trillion figure doesn't correspond to the numbers at right, it's actually low. In 2010, the AP put the 40-year tab of federal drug control spending at $1 trillion. But the massive federal drug control budget--for fiscal year 2013, it'll be $3.7 billion for interdiction, $9.4 billion for law enforcement, and $9.2 billion for early intervention--is actually a pretty small slice of the pie. States and municipalities have their own drug war expenses--investigating, trying, and locking up drug offenders--and those expenses actually dwarf what the federal government spends.

According to The Economic Impact of Illicit Drug Use on American Society, last published by the Department of Justice in 2011, enforcing illegal drug laws imposes an annual cost on the American criminal justice system of $56 billion; while incarceration of drug offenders poses an annual cost of $48 billion.

That's $104 billion spent annually by states and cities on two aspects of the drug war (and doesn't include treatment, public assistance, and a slew of other costs), compared to roughly $21 billion spent by the federal government. For $1.5 trillion to reflect just federal spending, the federal drug control budget would need to have been $37.5 billion a year, every year, for the last four decades. It's only slightly more than half that this year.

So, yes: There is a huge problem with the chart, in that 40 years of federal drug control spending does not add up to $1.5 trillion (though minus the "$1.5 trillion" in the middle of the image, the chart does accurately represent the growth of the federal drug control budget and the relatively flat rate of addiction to illicit substances). But even if the chart were designed to reflect "all costs associated with drug prohibition" over the last 40 years, with the right Y axis reflecting the growth of state and federal drug control spending, it would still be wrong, because $1.5 trillion doesn't nearly cover it.
 
Last edited:
If they did all of this so-called "checking" to determine there might be a meth lab inside the house, what level of stupid calls for the detonation of a flash-band grenade?

Cops talk about officer safety? Setting off a device like that if there was a meth lab would have been officer suicide.

That's simple.

"Officer safety" and the CFC is just a cover story.

This is all about war on us, acclimating us to the idea that cops can grenade us (or beat us, or taser us, or shoot us, or arrest us) whenever they want, for pretty much any reason they want.

War on us.

Never forgot that.
 
Back
Top