Most Despised GOP Presidential Aspirant Used By Haters Of America To Air Chips On the

Jorge

Member
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
17
From American (sic!) Chronicle

Most Despised GOP Presidential Aspirant Used By Haters Of America To Air Chips On the Shoulder

Edwin A. Sumcad
June 30, 2007

It is hard to argue against medical findings that once hatred is puked out of the system, it relieves a chronic disorder. This disorder is some kind of anxiety or OCD [obsessive-compulsive disorder]. Obsession may take the form of “repetitive ideas, thoughts and impulses [that] may focus on violence …” [1] Imagined threats make hostile aggression compulsive.

There are some readers who reacted to my article using that means of relief. The published article The Politics Of Solitude And The Economics Of The Cave In The Age Of Starwars [11] appeared in the American Chronicle June 27, 2007. It drew an OCD release from incorrigible haters of America and from congenital bangers of whatever America represents who found a common interest with Ron Paul, GOP presidential aspirant whose politics of isolation and economics of the cave were exhaustively exposed in the said editorial report.

The presidential wannabe referred to is considered an oddball because he is arguing for and in fact defending the 9/11 terrorist attack, by finding a plethora of faults in our foreign policy, and in the way we handle the war on terror here in the home front and in the Middle East which he believed justified the terrorists’ attacks killing thousands of innocent Americans.

The oddity of this runner for Republican presidential nomination is that he exudes with an overabundance of rhetorical venoms that sting and daze his opponents in public debate, and spits his philosophical toxins to knock out his prey in public, i.e. “cockroaches” in Washington, D.C., or maybe the greedy, light-fingered “globalist United Nations”, if not the U.S. policy makers in government; he accuses, convicts and hangs the government by the neck out of a litany of slipups and blunders real or imagined of which he is at the same time the accuser, the judge and the executioner.

Paul’s rhetorical arguments in the campaign trail had caught up with haters of America. In one of his follower’s published articles, the government is referred to as a fat “pig” that dipped into the pocket of wage earners in a fiscal robbery called “taxation”. Because of his aberration towards the Federal Government’s revenue-making role in the funding of public expenditures allegedly at the expense of the American people being robbed of their hard-earned income, Republican presidential tax caucuses and forums had started to exclude him and his mouthpieces from their group; in my honest observation and objective assessment of what’s happening, it’s like Republicans are now avoiding him and his handful of noisy supporters the way social lepers in the Bible were shunned and avoided. With haters of America behind them, they are very toxic to American voters who abhor them; without any iota of doubt Paul and his small but hyped yet unacceptable supporters would drag the Republican standard bearer down with him in defeat in the coming 2008 November election.

At this writing, a recent news release made an important announcement that The Iowans for Tax Relief and Iowa Christian Alliance are going to host a presidential candidates forum this coming Saturday, June 30, 2007. Ron Paul was not invited. [2]

/cut/

Full diatribe HERE
 
Damn, an impressive way to twist the ideas and words of Ron Paul. I wonder if the author will say the same of Fred Thompson who's following Ron Paul's rhetoric.
 
This is great, the more they attack him, the better the job he is doing.

Everyone is waking up to what the NWO psycho's have been up to and we aren't going to take it anymore...
 
Welcome to capitalism on crack. Where it's hip to hate anything that stands in your way.

The difference between a Conservative and a NeoCon, is a conscience.
 
that article goes on and on... it only gets worse. he isn't even making points towards the end. he is just blindly flailing at red herrings. wow - that was some serious RP hate coming from that amigo.
 
This sentence is especially enlightening:

It is an aggravated abuse of the government because Paul works for the government and paid the salary of a congressman plus all of the emoluments he receives appurtenant thereto, all paid for out of the tax money that the government had raised which he attacked. The image he projects to angry Americans as an “oddball” that has risen from the catacomb of Hell is never held in doubt.

This guy writes worse than I do before I have had my coffee, but I could overlook that if he had at least did some Google research.

The funny thing about modern politics is that political animals assume that all the other "political animals" in the arena are just like them, so they simply rely on a generic mudslinging when it comes to their opponents or targets. In this case, this "writer" (I use the term loosely) portrays Paul as a...screw it, it ain't worth explaining lol.

WTF is appurtenant?
 
I'm not sure if anyone can take it seriously, as he sounds like a talentless shill. He has all the objectivity of a Bill O'Reilly or Ann Coulter--on steroids.
 
Whew, this guy is unbelievable. His so-called article is so full of emotional rhetoric and rants (while lacking facts) that it is not even worth taking the time to respond to.
 
In fact, I did almost puke when I read this. Some people are just completely shameless. Brace yourselves, guys, they're going to be pulling out all the stops and there will be worse to come. We can only hope people will see through it.
 
Last edited:
It is also in Article II Section 2, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, which specifies Agreements Under the United Nations Charter.
I wonder where that dope got his copy of the Constitution.
 
yea, I felt sick to my stomach reading the garbage he wrote in an article posted late Saturday night.

He mostly bashed RP for his stance on the UN, then I noticed he worked for the UN....

Now we know the rest of the story:)
 
Still no response to my letter to the editors regarding this guy's clear violation of their editorial policy.

You can click here to read my letter.

Great letter! When I originally read the article (a day or two ago), I , too, found it disturbing. But I'm glad to hear about their editorial policy, and I don't think there's any doubt whether or not he is in violation of it. :D Rereading his words in the context of your letter, along with the description of what constitutes a violation of editorial policy, puts it in a different perspective, and I was laughing over it.
 
Great letter! When I originally read the article (a day or two ago), I , too, found it disturbing. But I'm glad to hear about their editorial policy, and I don't think there's any doubt whether or not he is in violation of it. :D Rereading his words in the context of your letter, along with the description of what constitutes a violation of editorial policy, puts it in a different perspective, and I was laughing over it.

Thanks. :)

Let's hope they actually live up to the standards they've set for themselves.
 
He mostly bashed RP for his stance on the UN, then I noticed he worked for the UN....

Now we know the rest of the story:)[/

I think that cuts to the heart of it. It seems that his "article" has a tone of communist or socialist propaganda.
 
Back
Top