MN-CD8: GOP Shenanigans or Honest Mistake?WRONG ADDRESS 4 CD 8

Dumb question but did anyone keep the return envelopes of what was mailed? Could we track the return addresses? (Same for email)
 
First, have a couple stationed at the dummy address just in case people show up there.

Second, Ben Swann that letter ASAP so he can get it on the air, he'll investigate the guy.
 
Ben Swann. Should I send it tonight or wait until after the meeting tomorrow? Do you know if anyone ran the fact that the location is different from what is on the letter past a parlimentarian to see if there is a way to cure that or if it needs to be cured?
Now. Update later.

I really really hope that our people on the ground will use this. Maybe it would be good to send Santorum and Gingriches voters to right address too. They will be pissed off too. Prepare speech ;)

Can someone count GOP officials who resigned, voted out etc. and replaced with Ron Paul people?
 
Now. Update later.

I really really hope that our people on the ground will use this. Maybe it would be good to send Santorum and Gingriches voters to right address too. They will be pissed off too. Prepare speech ;)

Can someone count GOP officials who resigned, voted out etc. and replaced with Ron Paul people?

Of course our people would direct anyone we knew was looking.

and even when the expendible GOP guy takes one for the team and is kicked out, they don't change the delegates to what they should be.
 
I got lottsa confidence in the '07-ers on the ground who posted above, and are watching this thread.

Is good fodder for a forum; a mystery to solve :) Shenanigans? or mistake? (and always the whodunit? We don't really even know for sure that the guy's name on it even authorized it...)

Of course, the ongoing corruption of the voting process by statist GOP apparatchiks weighs heavily in judgement... Friggin unAmerican clowns... (Often just petty corruption for petty reasons by people who spend their adult lives trying to escape what they really are, degenerates behind some mask






Disc-Degeneration.jpg


problem is the $#!+ adds up...)

As far as I'm concerned, more ammo for us in a war for hearts/minds, (and another bit of evidence to add to the pile helping us throw the bums out)
 
You're probably going to need someone at the "honest mistake" location to direct delegates to the real one, or at least someone should put up a sign the morning of the convention to make sure people know where they should be...

This
 
Shouldn't a Ron supporter be at the wrong address just in case some Ron Paul delegates "fall through the crack" and do NOT get the right information and show up there. They can then be redirected to the right location to the convention.
 
What will Romney campaign and the establishment GOP officials do next to try to fool us ?
 
Shouldn't a Ron supporter be at the wrong address just in case some Ron Paul delegates "fall through the crack" and do NOT get the right information and show up there. They can then be redirected to the right location to the convention.

They've got that taken care of.
 
This might dupe some older people or Santorum supporters, pretty sure they may have gotten the same misinformation.
 
Shouldn't a Ron supporter be at the wrong address just in case some Ron Paul delegates "fall through the crack" and do NOT get the right information and show up there. They can then be redirected to the right location to the convention.

Yes, if you go to the first pages of the thread, that is happening.....

but if a 'full quorum' of Romney folks are at the right address unwilling to vote to allow people time to get there...
 
Mail Fraud is actually a harder issue to prove. The mailing element is easy supposing the person is caught. The scheme to "defraud" is possible, if the letters were sent deliberately to deter votes. Defraud is in quotes for a reason. Property is the harder element. Congress passed a law to include "theft of honest services" in the statute. Of course, theft on honest services is harder to prove. The public officials, the delegates, are still behaving honestly but with deliberately wrong information.

If it is argued that the votes are the property, that is not clear as well. Intangibles issued by the government have not been clear as property. Licenses to run a business are not property unless already in the hands of the victim of the fraud. Driver's licenses may be. Voting... I'm not aware of a case on point.


Minnesota has a statute banning this specific activity. The only issue would be proving who sent it and the intent of the person. The fact that the new location is a house that is for sale would suggest an improper intent.

I have included the relevant statute below.

Nothing in this post is legal advice.

204C.035 DECEPTIVE PRACTICES IN ELECTIONS.
Subdivision 1.Criminal penalty.

No person shall knowingly deceive another person regarding the time, place, or manner of conducting an election or the qualifications for or restrictions on voter eligibility for an election, with the intent to prevent the individual from voting in the election. A violation of this section is a gross misdemeanor.

Subd. 2.Reporting false election information.

Any person may report to the county auditor or municipal clerk an act of deception regarding the time, place, or manner of conducting an election or the qualifications for or restrictions on voter eligibility for an election. The election official to whom the report was made shall provide accurate information to the person who reported the incorrect information in a timely manner, and may provide information about the act of deception and accurate information to mass media outlets in any affected area. The county attorney may subsequently proceed under subdivision 1.
 
Back
Top