Mitt Romney: We're better off strictly following the Constitution? WTF?!!!

[mconder]

Mitt Romney: Where better off strictly following the Constitution? WTF?!!!

 

[shrapnel88]

absurd.

 

[split_lipz]

Pfff, all talk.

He may talk the talk, but sure as hell doesn't walk the walk.

 

[JoeySweets]

what a plastic, phoney

 

[libertygrl]

I wanted to vomit when I heard him say that.

 

[Fig]

This entire debate was HORRIBLE. No one gave straight answers :x

AUGH.

 

[Mrossca]

You mean the biggest vote panderer on stage taking a page from Ron Paul's book? Who'd a thunk it?

 

[Menthol Patch]

None of these candidates truly support the Constitution except Ron Paul!

 

[atariman486]

His answer was in the context of whether their is a constitutional right to privacy. He thinks that in a "strict" interpretation of the document, there is no right mentioned, and that's why he talks about legislating if a "new" right is found. (How can there be a new right discovered, you've got me). This is his way of saying he follows the constitution, while supporting things like warrantless wiretaps and the "patriot" ACT, which are actually unconstitutional.

 

[EotS]

That's because Romney believes rights are granted by government.

Of course, they're not rights if they can be voted away, they're privileges.

No understanding of the constitution whatsoever, and highly dangerous.

 

[xao]

Too bad his flip-flopping record doesn't reflect his talk.

 

[xao]

This entire debate was HORRIBLE. No one gave straight answers :x

AUGH.

No one except Dr. Paul.

 

[Luther]

Ron Paul's only chance is if there are enough people who actually take the time and effort to research what the candidates actually stand for.

 

[xao]

Ron Paul's only chance is if there are enough people who actually take the time and effort to research what the candidates actually stand for.

If people don't listen to him and can't understand what he is saying then yes.

 

[Luther]

If people don't listen to him and can't understand what he is saying then yes.

Huh?

 

[TheNewYorker]

I think Romney really does want to run as RP's VP.

 

[tsetsefly]

Mitt Romney: Where better off strictly following the Constitution? WTF?!!!

and he followed it with "if people find new rights" wtf.. new rights? lmao

 

[xao]

Huh?

lol I rest my case.

 

[yaz]

"this totally baffles me. why doesn't he just open up the constitution and read it?"

 

[JEREMY420]

Its makes me sick to see him and julieani talking about how great they are on the constitution.. and their people eat it up!

I have worried about this from the begining.. because you know they are gonna start copying RP... by the time more people are in the loop on this thing.. they have copied what worked for RonPaul and the average voter could be fooled..

I hope they can see through their Lies..