Mark Mosconi
Member
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2007
- Messages
- 112
Anyone who has any common sense will see right through that type of rhetoric...sadly, I'm afraid to say that the common sense of most people seems bankrupt.
Unfortunately the sheeple don't have common sense only what the brainwashing will allow, unless they can be woken in time.Anyone who has any common sense will see right through that type of rhetoric...sadly, I'm afraid to say that the common sense of most people seems bankrupt.
Unfortunately the sheeple don't have common sense only what the brainwashing will allow, unless they can be woken in time.
.
That's because Romney believes rights are granted by government.
His answer was in the context of whether their is a constitutional right to privacy. He thinks that in a "strict" interpretation of the document, there is no right mentioned, and that's why he talks about legislating if a "new" right is found. (How can there be a new right discovered, you've got me). This is his way of saying he follows the constitution, while supporting things like warrantless wiretaps and the "patriot" ACT, which are actually unconstitutional.
So we should only choose at certain times to strictly follow The Constitution. Undeclared wars are ok, though, right?
Not exactly. We should always strictly follow the Constitution. We just need to change our definition of "strictly" every now and again.![]()
That's because Romney believes rights are granted by government.
Of course, they're not rights if they can be voted away, they're privileges.
No understanding of the constitution whatsoever, and highly dangerous.