MITHRAS = CHRISTIANITY?

Jamesiv1 said:
That is a really good idea. Maybe Brian could create a subforum called "Bible or burn in hell" or some such for the folks that just can't stop themselves from attacking the poster and the poster's beliefs, rather than discuss the OP.
Click to expand...

The OP has always been the center of discussion, and Ronin has largely seen fit to exempt himself from discussion of the OP, which is at issue here. If Ronin were able to handle a little heat for the fact that the topics that he posts are steeped in falsehood, we wouldn't have posts upon posts of him copying and pasting childish one-liners.

We should probably create an additional forum titled "Religion for the passive/aggressive conspiracy theorist", it would be the perfect place for Ronin's drivel.
 
Can you imagine a grown man on a public internet forum (where there is sometimes actual intellectual debate) repeatedly posting things like:

Thank you for your totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump post. May I please have another?

This is a grown man we are talking about here...acting like a little child. How shameful.
 
hells_unicorn said:
The OP has always been the center of discussion, and Ronin has largely seen fit to exempt himself from discussion of the OP, which is at issue here. If Ronin were able to handle a little heat for the fact that the topics that he posts are steeped in falsehood, we wouldn't have posts upon posts of him copying and pasting childish one-liners.

We should probably create an additional forum titled "Religion for the passive/aggressive conspiracy theorist", it would be the perfect place for Ronin's drivel.
Click to expand...


The thread topic is ...? Do you even have a fricken' clue?

Make your own damned threads. And just leave me, to mine.

Thank you for your totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump post. May I please have another?
 
Ronin Truth said:
The thread topic is ...? Do you even have a fricken' clue?
Click to expand...

You asked a question in "Mithras = Christianity?", I provided the answer in as "nope" in post #3. You provided a link and put the contents in quotes (all of it baseless nonsense from conspiratorial sources). I, in turn, provided a short video that dispels the nonsense you posted. You did not acknowledge the video, nor my answer and are pretending as though I never gave one. The topic of this thread was dealt with, and you are crying like a child because you don't have a rational recourse for having your nonsense refuted.

Make your own damned threads. And just leave me, to mine.
Click to expand...

Don't worry, I'll be getting to that in the coming days. And unlike you, my responses to dissent will not be "I'm not the thread topic" or "some canned snarky response that doesn't acknowledge the content of your post".
 
euphemia said:
Except that these are not the OP's beliefs. The premise was utterly refuted.
Click to expand...

There is NO premise. The thread topic is a question. See that little '?' mark at the end of the title?

In my logic classes, I never learned how to refute a question. Please do enlighten us all, on just how that works. :rolleyes:
 
hells_unicorn said:
You asked a question in "Mithras = Christianity?", I provided the answer in as "nope" in post #3. You provided a link and put the contents in quotes (all of it baseless nonsense from conspiratorial sources). I, in turn, provided a short video that dispels the nonsense you posted. You did not acknowledge the video, nor my answer and are pretending as though I never gave one. The topic of this thread was dealt with, and you are crying like a child because you don't have a rational recourse for having your nonsense refuted.

Your thread post answer of "nope" was your sole constructive ON TOPIC thread posting. I figured that just must have been an unintended oversight on your part. Everything else you have posted here has been totally OFF TOPIC and just your standard meaningless BS.

Don't worry, I'll be getting to that in the coming days. And unlike you, my responses to dissent will not be "I'm not the thread topic" or "some canned snarky response that doesn't acknowledge the content of your post".

OFF TOPIC content neither warrants or deserves any acknowledgment of it's garbage content.

No need for any concern on your part. I have absolutely ZERO interest in any OFF TOPIC diversion, distraction, destruction, thread hijacking or non-contribution nor thread bumps to any of your lame threads. I leave all of that boring type of infantile crap and behavior to you and the RPF Paulinista Mafia.

What a glorious endorsement of "Christianity" you all are and have been, as usual. :p :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
//
 
Ronin Truth said:
Your thread post answer of "nope" was your sole constructive ON TOPIC thread posting. I figured that just must have been an unintended oversight on your part. Everything else you have posted here has been totally OFF TOPIC and just your standard meaningless BS.

OFF TOPIC content neither warrants or deserves any acknowledgment of it's garbage content.

No need for any concern on your part. I have absolutely ZERO interest in any OFF TOPIC diversion, distraction, destruction, thread hijacking or non-contribution nor thread bumps to any of your lame threads. I leave all of that boring type of infantile crap and behavior to you and the RPF Paulinista Mafia.

What a glorious endorsement of "Christianity" you all are and have been, as usual.
Click to expand...

1. Post an article by someone who talks to aliens.
2. Use the entire thread to complain about how the thread isn't about him.
 
I just lost interest when Ronin told me he was unconcerned about using shoddy sources. There's no real discussion to be had when the sources are dismissed as unimportant though sources are a bedrock for any position. Isn't it foolishness to build a house on sand and when told, dismiss the foundation as unimportant and point at the new wallpaper?
 
Ronin Truth said:
Your thread post answer of "nope" was your sole constructive ON TOPIC thread posting.
Click to expand...

The video was on-topic as well, and I specifically selected it because it was reasonably short and simple, as you've demonstrated that you have the attention-span of a 7 year old. If you can't handle what the video has to say, just admit it and I'll call it a day on this topic, it's not like you have anything interesting to offer anyway.
 
Paulbot99 said:
I just lost interest when Ronin told me he was unconcerned about using shoddy sources. There's no real discussion to be had when the sources are dismissed as unimportant though sources are a bedrock for any position. Isn't it foolishness to build a house on sand and when told, dismiss the foundation as unimportant and point at the new wallpaper?
Click to expand...
Logical statements like this are OFF TOPIC in Ronin threads.
 
Ronin Truth said:
There is NO premise. The thread topic is a question. See that little '?' mark at the end of the title?

In my logic classes, I never learned how to refute a question. Please do enlighten us all, on just how that works. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
If you had paid attention in your logic class, you would recognize all the claims in the OP to be positive. The burden of proof is positive claimant in argumentation. You ought to be debating your opponents' counterpoints if you're serious about keeping the thread on topic as you claim.
 
heavenlyboy34 said:
If you had paid attention in your logic class, you would recognize all the claims in the OP to be positive. The burden of proof is positive claimant in argumentation. You ought to be debating your opponents' counterpoints if you're serious about keeping the thread on topic as you claim.
Click to expand...

Irrelevant. The OP "article" is not the the thread topic either, kinda like your OFF TOPIC post.

Thank you for your totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump post. May I have another?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

ClaytonB
Yes, the church of Jesus is the extreme right-wing
Replies
4
Views
82
ClaytonB
ClaytonB
ClaytonB
I don't care anymore
Replies
0
Views
51
ClaytonB
ClaytonB
PAF
What Would Jesus Do?
Replies
0
Views
51
PAF
PAF
R
Historicist View of Bible Prophecy, in Particular Regarding Anti-Christ and Mark of the Beast
2
Replies
32
Views
232
redmod79
R
jmdrake
Chinese Emperor KNEW Jesus was being Crucified - AS IT HAPPENED? Let's vet this claim!
Replies
3
Views
643
TheTexan
TheTexan
Back
Top