MITHRAS = CHRISTIANITY?

You can always know when the Paulinista Mafia is around because the actual thread is only very rarely, if ever, even mentioned. Kinda like what very little Paul knew of Jesus.
 
OFF TOPIC BS Paulinist malarkey posting: Noted. :p :rolleyes:

Actually you are the one arguing for a Paulinist position here because Marcionism (the position your are defending through Renan and these other crypto-Gnostic quacks) proposed making Paul Epistles superior to the synoptic Gospels and also wanted to get rid of the entire Old Testament and also wasn't terribly keen on James' Epistle either. Your idol Bart Ehrman has actually noted Marcion's obsession with Paul's teachings to the point of arguing that Paul's theology was not only different from the OT (it's not, just to be clear) but superior to everything else because of this illusive discontinuity.

Again, research first, assertions second. And no, brainless snark is not a substitute for actual research.
 
Actually you are the one arguing for a Paulinist position here because Marcionism (the position your are defending through Renan and these other crypto-Gnostic quacks) proposed making Paul Epistles superior to the synoptic Gospels and also wanted to get rid of the entire Old Testament and also wasn't terribly keen on James' Epistle either. Your idol Bart Ehrman has actually noted Marcion's obsession with Paul's teachings to the point of arguing that Paul's theology was not only different from the OT (it's not, just to be clear) but superior to everything else because of this illusive discontinuity.

Again, research first, assertions second. And no, brainless snark is not a substitute for actual research.

The thread topic is a question. DUH!

Thank you for your very typical totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump post. May I please have another?
 
"It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt."

-Mark Twain

Thank you for your very typical totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump post. May I please have another?
 

The fool says in his heart, "There is no God."

-Psalm 14:1

Whether or not Christianity came out of Mithraism doesn't really have anything to do with whether or not there is a God.
Even if it did, why do you think it helps to quote from a book that the person you are talking to doesn't acknowledge as an authority?
 
The thread topic is a question. DUH!

The article in the OP is not a question, it lends undue credence to a tin-foil conspiracy theory known as Christ Myth Theory. The minute that you dignify nonsense by giving it equal treatment to actual scholarship, the entire human race loses, regardless of what personal gains you think you've made by doing so.

Also, Glenn Beck is renowned for doing what you are doing, namely making a bold faced assertion with zero evidence to back it up and then simply putting a question mark at the end of it in order to avoid accountability for making irresponsible arguments.
 
Even if it did, why do you think it helps to quote from a book that the person you are talking to doesn't acknowledge as an authority?

Because the authority of scripture doesn't terminate on the opinion of a lone quack with a computer, maybe?
 
Because the authority of scripture doesn't terminate on the opinion of a lone quack with a computer, maybe?

Maybe it doesn't, but parroting scripture to a non-Christian who is already fully aware that the Bible claims non-believers are fools, is an exercise in futility and serves no purpose to communicate anything, other than to demonstrate the need of the parrot to reinforce his own belief through repetition.
 
Also, Glenn Beck is renowned for doing what you are doing, namely making a bold faced assertion with zero evidence to back it up and then simply putting a question mark at the end of it in order to avoid accountability for making irresponsible arguments.
Could I throw in Alex Jones too
 
Whether or not Christianity came out of Mithraism doesn't really have anything to do with whether or not there is a God.

Yes it does, because there is one God who reveals Himself in a particular way, and the other gods are idols that cannot save.

Even if it did, why do you think it helps to quote from a book that the person you are talking to doesn't acknowledge as an authority?

Yes, because God is speaking directly to him (and you). Furthermore, he knows (and you know) that what the Bible says is true, and you are suppressing it in unrighteousness. This is also in the Bible, in Romans 1.
 
Could I throw in Alex Jones too

Be my guest, I don't particularly care for Alex Jones either, for a number of other reasons apart from that one.

Maybe it doesn't, but parroting scripture to a non-Christian who is already fully aware that the Bible claims non-believers are fools, is an exercise in futility and serves no purpose to communicate anything, other than to demonstrate the need of the parrot to reinforce his own belief through repetition.

To be fair, Ronin actually protested when I accused him of being an atheist, so technically Sola's quote of that passage was not effective because it was running on an incorrect premise. However, I'd question if Ronin is really aware of anything the bible says because he isn't even aware of half the stuff that he's been posting here because he doesn't even read it, let alone read up on who wrote it.
 
Yes it does, because there is one God who reveals Himself in a particular way, and the other gods are idols that cannot save.
If Christianity is not true, then that would not necessarily be the case because Christianity is what is claiming it in the first place. Hence, the reason why the truth of Christianity is independent from the truth of whether or not a God exists.

Yes, because God is speaking directly to him (and you). Furthermore, he knows (and you know) that what the Bible says is true, and you are suppressing it in unrighteousness. This is also in the Bible, in Romans 1.

Yup, it says it right there in Romans 1!
 
The article in the OP is not a question, it lends undue credence to a tin-foil conspiracy theory known as Christ Myth Theory. The minute that you dignify nonsense by giving it equal treatment to actual scholarship, the entire human race loses, regardless of what personal gains you think you've made by doing so.

Also, Glenn Beck is renowned for doing what you are doing, namely making a bold faced assertion with zero evidence to back it up and then simply putting a question mark at the end of it in order to avoid accountability for making irresponsible arguments.

The thread topic IS a question, as is the thread title. Research first, then Bullshit.


Thank you for your totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump post. May I please have another?
 
Back
Top