MITHRAS = CHRISTIANITY?

Pretty old for a French Nazi, don't ya think? Do folks usually just buy your bogus BS? You could very easily be a Paulinist minister with that talent.

1823 - 1892

You can take your sign back and just stick it where the sun doesn't shine.

I didn't state that Renan was a Nazi, I stated that his viewpoints regarding Jesus' racial makeup influenced what later became both Nazi and Neo-Nazi thought, though I was implying that Renan was an influential figure in anti-Semitic thought in Europe during the 19th century and was also more of a quack than a scholar. If you've read any of Hitler's speeches or works on his view of Christianity, he was very big into arguing the notion that Jesus was actually an Aryan and not Jewish. Renan is not the first person to argue this way, as you can trace this nonsense back to a 2nd century Gnostic heresy called Marcionism. All of these viewpoints have a common thread of anti-Semitic thought (contrary to Martin Luther, who was anti-Judaic in a religious sense, but not in a racial sense, as I know a lot of modern liberals love to tie Luther in with Hitler) that runs against your whole notion of being "Jesus only", considering that Jesus' lineage to David is spelled out in full detail in the opening chapter of Matthew's Gospel, ergo we're not talking about anything connected to Paul you idiot.

Don't cry to me because you don't do your research on people before quoting them.
 
Last edited:
Not at all. It's just a trigger to the greater topic conversation. And only a means to the end. The tread topic doesn't necessarily rise of fall on the quality of the OP nor is it dependent on it. 200 posts so far. <shrug> Not too bad.

You may select the OP quality criteria you want to impose on the threads you start. OK?

Suit yourself.
 
Not at all. It's just a trigger to the greater topic conversation. And only a means to the end. The tread topic doesn't necessarily rise of fall on the quality of the OP nor is it dependent on it. 200 posts so far. <shrug> Not too bad.

You may select the OP quality criteria you want to impose on the threads you start. OK?

Not a greater topic discussion, but if that's what you want to think, go ahead. This is not the first time you have been told your links are short on scholarship and actual facts. What you are doing, as I have said before, is not looking at other religions, but what other people want to say about those religions, whether they know anything or not. Clearly they couldn't get published anywhere else.
 
Not a greater topic discussion, but if that's what you want to think, go ahead. This is not the first time you have been told your links are short on scholarship and actual facts. What you are doing, as I have said before, is not looking at other religions, but what other people want to say about those religions, whether they know anything or not. Clearly they couldn't get published anywhere else.

I am not the thread topic, so why are you posting here?

Thank you for your totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump post. May I have another?
 
Not a greater topic discussion, but if that's what you want to think, go ahead. This is not the first time you have been told your links are short on scholarship and actual facts. What you are doing, as I have said before, is not looking at other religions, but what other people want to say about those religions, whether they know anything or not. Clearly they couldn't get published anywhere else.

That's actually a great point. Ronin has never quoted a Biblical Christian and displayed what they believe. It's only atheists and/or people who say they talk to aliens.
 
I am not the thread topic, so why are you posting here?

Thank you for your totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump post. May I have another?
euphemia is also not the thread topic. Why engage him if he's troubling you so? Nice totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump yourself, bud. :) *hugs*
 
Except I am not a he. I am a she, who prefers actual theology and factual resources, not fakery, dishonesty, and general proliferation of nonsense.
 
Last edited:
euphemia is also not the thread topic. Why engage him if he's troubling you so? Nice totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump yourself, bud. :) *hugs*

Here's what Ronin does:

1. Post an article by someone who talks to aliens.
2. Use the entire thread to complain about how the thread isn't about him.
 
People who are serious about their theology read very hard books written by people who have studied Greek and Hebrew and know what they are talking about.

The rest make it up as they go along and post to Google because people who read after them will believe anything and won't test the veracity of what they read.
 
Except I am not a he. I am a she, who prefers actual theology and factual resources, not fakery, dishonesty, and general proliferation of nonsense.
Beg yer pardon, ma'am. *hugs* If you are interested in actual theology and factual resources, you won't find them on a typical Ronin religion thread. He's the religion forum equivalent of a tabloid news paper where they talk about bigfoot, alien babies, etc.
 
I didn't state that Renan was a Nazi, I stated that his viewpoints regarding Jesus' racial makeup influenced what later became both Nazi and Neo-Nazi thought, though I was implying that Renan was an influential figure in anti-Semitic thought in Europe during the 19th century and was also more of a quack than a scholar. If you've read any of Hitler's speeches or works on his view of Christianity, he was very big into arguing the notion that Jesus was actually an Aryan and not Jewish. Renan is not the first person to argue this way, as you can trace this nonsense back to a 2nd century Gnostic heresy called Marcionism. All of these viewpoints have a common thread of anti-Semitic thought (contrary to Martin Luther, who was anti-Judaic in a religious sense, but not in a racial sense, as I know a lot of modern liberals love to tie Luther in with Hitler) that runs against your whole notion of being "Jesus only", considering that Jesus' lineage to David is spelled out in full detail in the opening chapter of Matthew's Gospel, ergo we're not talking about anything connected to Paul you idiot.

Don't cry to me because you don't do your research on people before quoting them.

OFF TOPIC BS Paulinist malarkey posting: Noted. :p :rolleyes:
 
Except I am not a he. I am a she, who prefers actual theology and factual resources, not fakery, dishonesty, and general proliferation of nonsense.

Hey, son of a gun, what a coincidence, that's precisely some of the very reasons I left "Christianity" (so called). There may be some hope for you yet.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
euphemia is also not the thread topic. Why engage him if he's troubling you so? Nice totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump yourself, bud. :) *hugs*

Thank you for your totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump post. May I please have another?

I'll monitor my own threads. You get to take care of monitoring your own.
 
Here's what Ronin does:

1. Post an article by someone who talks to aliens.
2. Use the entire thread to complain about how the thread isn't about him.


Silly Sola_Fide post score +1.

Thank you for your very typical totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump post. May I please have another?
 
Silly Sola_Fide post score +1.

Thank you for your very typical totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump post. May I please have another?

1. Post an article by someone who talks to aliens.
2. Use the entire thread to complain about how the thread isn't about him.
 
People who are serious about their theology read very hard books written by people who have studied Greek and Hebrew and know what they are talking about.

The rest make it up as they go along and post to Google because people who read after them will believe anything and won't test the veracity of what they read.

Have you managed to follow and figure out what Kierkegaard was saying?

"Complexity is the essence of the con and the hustle."
 
Last edited:
Beg yer pardon, ma'am. *hugs* If you are interested in actual theology and factual resources, you won't find them on a typical Ronin religion thread. He's the religion forum equivalent of a tabloid news paper where they talk about bigfoot, alien babies, etc.

Thank you for your totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump post. May I please have another?
 
1. Post an article by someone who talks to aliens.
2. Use the entire thread to complain about how the thread isn't about him.

Silly Sola_Fide post score +1.

Thank you for your very typical totally worthless OFF TOPIC thread bump post. May I please have another?
 
Back
Top