Mike Huckabee: States Can Ignore Supreme Court On Marriage

William Tell

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2014
Messages
12,146
[h=1]Mike Huckabee: States Can Ignore Supreme Court On Gay Marriage[/h]

n-MIKE-HUCKABEE-large570.jpg


WASHINGTON -- Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee disputed what he called the "notion of judicial supremacy" on Tuesday, arguing states would have the final say on gay marriage regardless of whether the Supreme Court rules that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry.
Huckabee, a conservative evangelical and potential 2016 presidential candidate, said a Supreme Court ruling, expected this year, would ultimately be moot because "one branch of government does not overrule the other two."
"One thing I am angry about though ... is this notion of judicial supremacy, where if the court makes a decision, I hear governors and even some aspirants to the presidency say, 'Well that's settled, it's the law of the land.' No, it's not the law of the land," Huckabee said in an interview with conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt.

"Constitutionally, the courts cannot make a law, they can interpret one and then the legislature has to create enabling legislation and the executive has to sign it and has to enforce it," Huckabee added.
A ruling from the high court, however, would not "make law," but rather would invalidate existing bans on gay marriage as unconstitutional. State legislatures would need no additional law to recognize same-sex marriages. Similar appellate court decisions have already done so in 36 states and the District of Columbia -- all of which now recognize same-sex marriages.
This isn't the first time Huckabee has flirted with the theory of nullification. The comments place him on the far right of his party -- even more so than Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), a potential rival in the race for the White House.
Continue: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/...ourt_n_6512042.html?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000592
 
I agree with Huckabee on this theoretically, although it's something that's impractical in the sense that anyone who ran on this platform wouldn't have any chance to win the general election.
 
Huh. States also ignored the verdict on Brown v. Board of Education. That didn't last too long. There's states' rights, and then there's just trying to delay the inevitable.
 
Huckabee, a conservative evangelical and potential 2016 presidential candidate, said a Supreme Court ruling, expected this year, would ultimately be moot because "one branch of government does not overrule the other two."

Well the problem is that if the Supreme Court overturns laws barring recognition of gay marriage, that will be two branches (executive and judicial) overruling one (legislative). Huckabee is picking the wrong hill to die on. But then nobody accused him of being a scholar. At the end of the day governors could ignore the ruling. What happened the last time that was tried?

8302889.gif


0925_big.gif
 
Back
Top