Check marks suddenly concerned about zero-evidence claims as to the identity of a mass shooter.
What could it possibly have been that made them feel this way about this shooting in particular?
Whoever National Conservative is, he makes it a point to check and verify what he posts.
He also consistently denounces regurgitating rage/slop posters.
That's why I use his data.
And in this case, he'll probably turn out to be correct. So far, there seems to be no political or religious motivation to this attack at all. If the attacker had a large online presence making his grievances known to the world, it would already have been found and amplified to the high heavens, left or right. Other than a personal grudge, maybe one of the Mormon elders stole his wife away or cheated him in a business deal, something like that, it appears to be just a random act of violence and evil.
Like that veteran in Maine not too long ago, that shot all those people in a bowling alley for no particular reason.
About the only political points that can be driven home here, like the New Orleans attack on New Year's Day, is that you do not necessarily need a gun to kill or terrorize and good guys with guns stop bad guys with guns.
Well, that and beware of mad, motivated Marines.
www.breitbart.com
www.bbc.com
