Mexico refuses to pay for wall

If Trump were elected Mexico would build that wall themselves, pronto. Just like the Iranians gave up the hostages when Raygun was elected, Because the Donald is a alpha male. That wall would be up in a week and all the illegals would be gone by then.
 
You won't see this on FOX, until Rand is out ... The news media is so transparent to us, but how can we educate others?
 
Why DON'T Mexican's want a border wall? Wouldn't shutting down the drug trade help their situation a lot? Don't they want a secure country?

The way they talk, it comes off like they're benefiting tremendously from this situation. Despite the extremely strict immigration laws they have in Mexico, they don't want a border fence? This just doesn't follow logically.
 
forcing Mexico to pay might be the only way to build such a wall. it would never get 60 votes in the senate. but a president can impose tariffs, close the border, block weapons sales, refuse the let relatives of political elite of Mexico live or go to college in USA.

a wall might be stupid, but its better than e-verify national ID
 
It is the Mexicans job to enshrine their own liberty. If you want to go to Mexico and help them, feel free. I'm done with this shit. We have enough to do to convince our own countrymen and fix our own government.

Mexico will probably enshrine liberty when it is conquered, but I doubt anybody who believes in liberty would have the stomach for that.

Other than that, call the waaaambulance. Americans have and are being killed by illegal aliens that have no business being here. Diseases long ago eradicated from the U.S. are back and we are being forced to educate and give free health care to all these people.

Didn't you get the memo LibertyEagle? American lives are only worth 3/5ths of a Mestizo life. Those who think otherwise can feel free to get an opinion from their local La Raza affiliate on that one.

Anyone who would agree with that is nuts, or a huge leftist.

In other words, said person would either be a huge leftist, or a huge leftist.

Are you serious? I have only rarely heard such insane and sadistic propositions advanced seriously. Not even Barry Young would entertain such a notion.

I don't know if I'd shoot anybody who crosses the border myself, but the so-called undocumented immigrants who have either raped or murdered somebody would do well to get 2 in the back of the head, after a trial and conviction of course. I also might entertain publicly flogging a state or city official who would release such a person under "sanctuary city" standards.
 
Last edited:
Are you serious? I have only rarely heard such insane and sadistic propositions advanced seriously. Not even Barry Young would entertain such a notion.

2lcxr0o.jpg
 
Why DON'T Mexican's want a border wall? Wouldn't shutting down the drug trade help their situation a lot? Don't they want a secure country?

The way they talk, it comes off like they're benefiting tremendously from this situation. Despite the extremely strict immigration laws they have in Mexico, they don't want a border fence? This just doesn't follow logically.
Yes, because no one, especially multi-billionaire drug lords, could ever afford a plane, a boat, a tunnel, one's ass, or any other conceivable way to bring drugs across a border.

I mean, it's not like they have submarines or anything.
 
It is the Mexicans job to enshrine their own liberty. If you want to go to Mexico and help them, feel free. I'm done with this shit. We have enough to do to convince our own countrymen and fix our own government.
You are case in point of the sort of hard headed people who need convincing. Trust me, I understand.

Other than that, call the waaaambulance. Americans have and are being killed by illegal aliens that have no business being here. Diseases long ago eradicated from the U.S. are back and we are being forced to educate and give free health care to all these people. Anyone who would agree with that is nuts, or a huge leftist.
You got me pegged. I am pro-murder and pro-disease.

It's ironic that you would say, "anyone who would agree with that is nuts, or a huge leftist" after you advocate the summary execution of men, women and children for crossing an imaginary and disputed line your masters invented. Dare I say, you sound like Margaret Sanger? Bitter as a bat, too.
 
In other words, said person would either be a huge leftist, or a huge leftist.
See, maybe it is just a confusion of terms.

When I consider, "leftism," or rather, "progressivism," I tend to think of those who quite frankly lack the fortitude to be criminals. Yes, they talk a lot of game about "two to the head" and various cliches but the truth of the matter is that most are cowards who would rather secretly elect unaccountable representatives, who they will hardly even claim lest they be found out, to rob productive members of society to pay for this and that. I think of collectivists and legal positivists attempting to rewrite the law. I think of protectionists and the economically ignorant.

Sometimes it is the eugenicists who come to mind. Sometimes it is the build-a-wall sorts. Birds of a feather and all that.

I guess anymore I only have two categories. Those who wish to rob me but haven't the balls to openly do so, and those who don't. Does that make sense, oh, social contract theorist, you?

Oh, and fuck La Raza.
 
execution of rapists for crossing an imaginary and disputed line
FTFY
It's better if you dehumanize them like a horde of zombies, even though they are mostly kids. Make sure you shoot them in the head twice and go for the double tap. Don't want them getting back up and infecting or raping you.
 
Who cares whether Mexicans will pay for the wall or not? The cost is peanuts, relatively speaking. Who cares even whether the wall is built or not? As shown by most of the other countries, the wall is not necessary to protect the borders.

What Trump has done, is what is called in negotiations "moving beyond the sale." We are discussing who pays for the wall, practically accepting that the borders should be secured one way or another. Before Trump, it wasn't accepted by the establishment in all three parties, including libertarians.
 
Who cares whether Mexicans will pay for the wall or not? The cost is peanuts, relatively speaking. Who cares even whether the wall is built or not? As shown by most of the other countries, the wall is not necessary to protect the borders.

What Trump has done, is what is called in negotiations "moving beyond the sale." We are discussing who pays for the wall, practically accepting that the borders should be secured one way or another. Before Trump, it wasn't accepted by the establishment in all three parties, including libertarians.

Just because trump supporters are the loudest doesn't mean they are a majority

r1glemm69eelxosdc43l9w.png
 
Back
Top