Mass Layoffs spark surge in state jobless claims

Warlord

Member
Joined
May 2, 2013
Messages
11,694
Looks like states are going to be overwhelmed and are not ready for what's coming...

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — In Ohio, more than 48,000 people applied for jobless benefits during the first two days of this week. The tally during the same period the prior week: just 1,825.

In neighboring Pennsylvania, about 70,000 people sought unemployment aid in a single day — six times the total for the entire previous week.

Jobless claims are surging across the U.S. after governmental officials ordered millions of workers, students and shoppers to stay at home as a precaution against spreading the virus that causes the COVID-19 disease.

“We’ve been getting flooded with calls,” said John Dodds, director of the nonprofit Philadelphia Unemployment Project. “It’s going to be a big mess, a double mess: illness and unemployment.”

The growing number of people filing for unemployment checks raises fresh questions about whether states have stockpiled enough money since the last recession to tide over idled workers until the crisis ends. Some fear the demand for help could outpace the states’ ability to pay claims.

“Our unemployment insurance fund is getting hit pretty hard right now,” said Gov. Gina Raimondo of Rhode Island, where coronavirus-related jobless claims accelerated from zero to nearly 18,000 in barely one week.

Raimondo, a Democrat, said the state already needed to start replenishing its fund and appealing for help from the federal government, which she said needed to “step up.”

President Donald Trump’s administration is proposing an economic stimulus package that could approach $1 trillion and include sending checks to Americans within a matter of weeks to help them pay for groceries, bills, mortgages and rent. A separate aid bill pending in Congress could inject $1 billion into state unemployment insurance programs.

The federal aid could rival or exceed that of the Great Recession in 2008, when a financial industry crisis led to widespread layoffs. Economic analysts warn the country is likely entering — or already in — its first recession since then.

The last recession led to the insolvency of unemployment trust funds in 35 states that collectively racked up more than $40 billion of debt to keep paying unemployed workers. In many states, those debts were repaid through higher taxes on employers.

To shore up their trust funds, some states also cut the amount and duration of benefits for those who became unemployed in the future.

“States aren’t really recession-ready, because it’s so hard for people to get benefits, stay in the program, and the benefits are insufficient,” said Michele Evermore, a senior policy analyst at the National Employment Law Project, a New York-based group that advocates for low-wage workers and the unemployed.

Jobless claims and unemployment also are rising around the globe. The U.N.’s International Labor Organization estimates that fallout from the coronavirus outbreak could lead to nearly 25 million job losses worldwide and drain up to $3.4 trillion worth of income by the end of this year.

In the U.S., state unemployment trust funds generally are in better financial shape than they were before the last recession. Yet 21 states began the year with less than the amount recommended to remain solvent in an average recession, according to a U.S. Department of Labor report. At the bottom of the solvency list are many of the most populous states — California, Texas, New York, Illinois, Ohio and Massachusetts.

Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine, a Republican, was among the first to shut down schools, sporting events and certain businesses because of the coronavirus. Unemployment claims have since skyrocketed.

DeWine’s administration acknowledged that state lawmakers likely will have to intervene to shore up the state’s shaky unemployment trust fund.

“The workers out there should not be worried. It will be funded for their needs,” said Ohio Lt. Gov. Jon Husted, also a Republican.

Pennsylvania in January finally made the last payment on billions of dollars of bonds issued in 2012 to cover the unemployment fund debt from the last recession. But its fund remains in danger of insolvency, according to the U.S. Labor Department report.

In Tennessee, new unemployment claims tripled over the past week. Michigan received four times as many jobless claims as had been expected on the first day of this week.

Warnings to stay away from public gathering spots also have made it more complicated to apply for benefits, with some state unemployment offices closed to the public. Instead, they have shifted more applicants from offices to websites and phone calls, but even those systems are being taxed.

New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy said the number of unemployment insurance requests was so high at the start of this week that it crashed the state labor department’s website.

New York’s labor department said it’s experiencing “an unprecedented increase” in calls and online visits for unemployment benefits. During the first half of Tuesday, it had 110,000 website visits and 21,000 phone calls. That’s 2 1/2 times the web traffic and 10 times the phone calls of the entire previous Tuesday. At times, the surge was too much for the agency to handle.

Governors and lawmakers in many states took action this week to make unemployment benefits easier and quicker to get. Some also waived rules that disregard the first week of unemployment or extended the total number of weeks people can be eligible.

In North Carolina, which offers less in jobless benefits than most states, displaced workers won’t have to be actively looking for a new job, as is required for traditional benefits, and employers who must lay off workers won’t be financially responsible for the benefits their workers receive.

Kansas lawmakers worked quickly Tuesday to pass legislation that eliminates a one-week wait to begin receiving benefits and expands their duration from 16 to 26 weeks. But House Commerce Committee Chairman Rep. Sean Tarwater, a Republican, expressed concern that the economic problems caused by the virus pandemic could deplete the state’s unemployment fund in less than a year, even though it’s ranked in the top quarter nationally.

“What we are seeing is something totally unique here, where the switch has flipped from historically low claims numbers to a dramatic escalation that’s going to affect multiple segments of the economy,” said Kansas Deputy Labor Department Secretary Brett Flachsbarth.

https://apnews.com/d2a5e80b7ba7d568e9e6a3966d6308d0
 
The State UI programs best get their sh!t together and quick. This should be the first line of defense, not the Federal government.
 
The State UI programs best get their sh!t together and quick. This should be the first line of defense, not the Federal government.

They bought into the Boom. They thought it would last forever and have not saved for a rainy day.
 
A quick google says retail yearly for grocery and household merchandise is roughly 350 billion. Grocery stores are about half that. Restaurants are more than both combined.

People are still gonna get their checks for at least a month. School/government workers for sure. They plan to throw another $300B at small businesses and just as much in direct payments to individuals who are going to do what?

Well, they're going to TRY to buy groceries, cigarettes, and anything else perceived as holding value and tradeable.

This means the already trying-to-recover supply chain is going to get hammered even harder within weeks. The grocery supply chain-just by the numbers-cannot match the demand shock coming. These virtue-signaling legislators have not thought this through. Increasing purchasing power does not solve a supply problem. People need to consume less and coordinate and share.

Anyway, as any Ron Paul supporter knows, these people know nothing about economics.
 
The State UI programs best get their sh!t together and quick. This should be the first line of defense, not the Federal government.

I will have to ask my buddy who's blaming Trump for the corona mess if the states inability to help the unemployment apocalypse is his fault too.
 
A quick google says retail yearly for grocery and household merchandise is roughly 350 billion. Grocery stores are about half that. Restaurants are more than both combined.

People are still gonna get their checks for at least a month. School/government workers for sure. They plan to throw another $300B at small businesses and just as much in direct payments to individuals who are going to do what?

Well, they're going to TRY to buy groceries, cigarettes, and anything else perceived as holding value and tradeable.

This means the already trying-to-recover supply chain is going to get hammered even harder within weeks. The grocery supply chain-just by the numbers-cannot match the demand shock coming. These virtue-signaling legislators have not thought this through. Increasing purchasing power does not solve a supply problem. People need to consume less and coordinate and share.

Anyway, as any Ron Paul supporter knows, these people know nothing about economics.

...not to mention the production-suppressing price controls being implementing all over the place.

I find this especially criminal on the part of politicians, as I'm pretty sure most of them understand the basic economics of that policy, but do it anyway because the 'oi polloi, whose votes they want, do not. When they do this during hurricanes and so forth, they can get away with it, because those crises don't last long enough for production to be significantly affected, and so the policy is largely symbolic. This time it's going to have noticeable effects, if it continues.
 
States that cannot take care of a little unemployment deserve to be razed in my opinion .
 
Back
Top