Marxist Muslim, who is anti free speech and anti white, is now ruler of Scotland

Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
117,615
William Wallace my aching fucking ass.


Anti-Free Speech Separatist Who Wants Fewer White People in Office Now Leads Scotland

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/20...er-white-people-in-office-now-leads-scotland/

JACK MONTGOMERY 27 Mar 2023

Humza Yousaf, a left-separatist who has pioneered anti-free speech legislation and lobbied for fewer white people in high office, will be sworn in as the leader of Scotland on Wednesday.

Yousaf has succeeded Nicola Sturgeon as leader of the Scottish National Party (SNP), which leads Scotland’s devolved government — roughly equivalent to a U.S. State government — in coalition with the even further left Scottish Greens.

He saw off Christian rival Kate Forbes, who was pressured over her private opposition to same-sex marriage during an internal leadership campaign, falling short in the first round by scraping over the halfway mark with 52.1 per cent of the vote after the votes of an eliminated third candidate were redistributed to him under a complex Single Transferable Vote system.

The controversial politician is perhaps best known for championing anti-free speech laws which criminalise “stirring up” so-called “hatred” even in a person’s private home, declaring: “Are we comfortable giving a defence to somebody whose behaviour is threatening or abusive, which is intentionally stirring up hatred against, for example, Muslims? Are we saying that that is justified because that is in the home?”

Yousaf is also somewhat notorious for a viral rant in the Scottish Parliament against the number of white people in high office in Scotland — which is 91.8 per cent White Scottish/British, plus another 4.2 per cent Polish, Irish, Gypsy/Traveller, or ‘White: Other’ in the last census — and asserted that “Scotland has a problem of structural racism.”
 
The "complex Single Transferable Vote system" is a symptom, not necessarily the problem. Centralization is the problem. Scotland needs to go back to organizing by Clans and Houses if it's interested in stability. You can have your anti-free speech law in your House but it doesn't apply to mine.
 
Don't mess with people who throw telephone polls for fun.
 
Last edited:
Meanwhile across the pond:

Scottish Justice Sec Demands ‘Hate Speech’ at Home Be Prosecuted

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/20...e-sec-demands-hate-speech-home-be-prosecuted/

Victoria Friedman 29 Oct 2020

Humza Yousaf has said that he wants Scotland’s new hate crime bill to criminalise conversations in private homes, if they allegedly stir up hatred.

Journalists, Christians, secular groups, comedians, writers, academics, and the police have all come out in objection to the proposed Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Bill which would criminalise the perceived stirring up of hatred against a group with ‘protected characteristics’, such as religion, sexual orientation, or race.

Despite reports last month that the proposed law would be ‘watered down’, so that authorities would still require evidence of intent to offend in order to secure a conviction, Mr Yousaf, of the leftist separatist Scottish National Party (SNP) wants the law to have the power to invade people’s private homes, according to The Times.

Yousaf said there would not be a “dwelling defence” — such as in the 1986 Public Order Act which outlaws abusive, threatening, or insulting words if uttered in your own home — so that discussions at a dinner table could land a Scotsman in court for hate speech.

“Are we comfortable giving a defence to somebody whose behaviour is threatening or abusive, which is intentionally stirring up hatred against, for example, Muslims? Are we saying that that is justified because that is in the home?… If your intention was to stir up hatred against Jews… then I think that deserves criminal sanction,” Mr Yousaf told Members of the Scottish Parliament.

Count Dankula: Hate Crime Bill Will Criminalise ‘Jokes and Memes’, ‘Coward’s Way Out’ of Dealing With Racism https://t.co/OZsJT0DWPa

— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) July 26, 2020

In reaction to Wednesday’s Times report, Mr Yousaf doubled down on his position, saying: “If you invite ten mates round and it can be proven beyond reasonable doubt that you intentionally stirred up hatred against Jews, why should this not be prosecuted? It would if you did so down the pub but not in your house?”

Head of the Free Speech Union Toby Young warned that this type of censorship might occur south of the border, saying on Wednesday in response the to the report: “The Law Commission of England and Wales is proposing to change the law so exactly the same thing applies here.”

Concerns have been raised over the effect the Scottish law will have on freedom of speech, including on comedy, with Yousaf saying he wants the rules to be applicable the theatre directors and journalists, too.

Christians fear that the law could even result in the Bible being at risk of being considered offensive material. The Free Church of Scotland said in July that as “the offence of possessing inflammatory material could lead to books and other materials being confiscated and destroyed”, quoting verses deemed offensive could see “the Bible itself” be taken and disposed of.

Likewise, Scottish Catholic bishops worry that “possessing inflammatory material could even render material such as the Bible and the Catechism of the Catholic Church … inflammatory”.

A leading atheist in Scotland has hailed the SNP’s proposed Hate Crime Bill as an opportunity to target Christians for prosecution.https://t.co/XMc83dvVAy

— Christian Concern (@CConcern) September 1, 2020

In August, the head of Atheists Scotland Ian Stewart said that he looked forward to the passing of the bill, which could be used to “enable the prosecution of all Scotland’s religions and their Holy Books for spreading hatred”.

The National Secular Society for its part, however, warned that the proposed law would threaten the freedom to criticise religion, warning in July that the bill “risks capturing a vast array of speech and will create an unreasonable expectation that religious sensibilities are protected by something akin to a blasphemy law”. Even with the recent inclusion of needing to prove intent to offend, the secular group said that that was not enough and that the bill remains “a menace to free and open debate”.

In July, Markus Meechan, the Scottish Youtuber and free speech advocate known artistically as Count Dankula, warned that the bill was a new form of puritanism which would criminalise jokes and memes, and “restricts the human right of freedom of expression”.

Mr Meechan told Breitbart London: “It outlaws many forms of expression through mediums ranging from online communications right up to live comedy performances, and it justifies this with the term ‘stirring up hatred’, something completely subjective and the legislation defines this term so poorly, if at all, and the term itself is completely without merit.”

Secularists and Christians Align in Opposing Scottish ‘Hate Crime’ Bill https://t.co/crbshYJGy6

— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) May 11, 2020

//
 
Meanwhile across the pond:

Scottish Justice Sec Demands ‘Hate Speech’ at Home Be Prosecuted

The Scottish National Socialist Party
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2nk_wvdfSY

Why would you allow any of these totalitarians to control what you can and can't say?

Yousaf said there would not be a “dwelling defence” — such as in the 1986 Public Order Act which outlaws abusive, threatening, or insulting words if [not] uttered in your own home — so that discussions at a dinner table could land a Scotsman in court for hate speech.

[...]

In reaction to Wednesday’s Times report, Mr Yousaf doubled down on his position, saying: “If you invite ten mates round and it can be proven beyond reasonable doubt that you intentionally stirred up hatred against Jews, why should this not be prosecuted? It would if you did so down the pub but not in your house?”

Well ... he's kinda got a point, you know. Really ...

After all, if you have already criminalized speech at the pub, then how do you justify not criminalizing it at the dinner table, too?

(Camel Nose, meet Tent. Tent, this is Camel Nose ...)

Concerns have been raised over the effect the Scottish law will have on freedom of speech, including on comedy, with Yousaf saying he wants the rules to be applicable the theatre directors and journalists, too.

"Concerns have been raised ..."

Yeah, I'm sure they have been, for all the good they'll do.

I'll bet that "concerns [had] been raised" over the 1986 Public Order Act, too.

And where did that get you, except where you are right now?

Maybe people need to stop raising concerns.

Maybe they need to start raising torches and pitchforks ... and fence rails ... and buckets of tar ... and sacks of feathers ...


It's often late, but it's never too late ...
 
https://twitter.com/montie/status/1640343083886731270
RrIbV9T.png
 
Humza Yousaf resigns

https://twitter.com/OliLondonTV/status/1784922803642192097
After Scotland’s First Leader Humza Yousaf announced his resignation today, his replacement could be even worse.

Anas Sarwar, the leader of the Labour Party, has been rising in the polls and should a snap election be called may have a chance of winning.

Sarwar previously gave a near identical speech to Yousaf lambasting Scotland for being too white.

The Labour politician said if he was to be elected First Minister he would include misogyny in the new Hate Crime law.

His party have also said they would not repeal the new law, despite its deep unpopularity for allowing transgender males to report misgendering as a ‘Hate Crime.’

According to polling by Redfield and Wilton Strategies conducted in March, 32% of respondents think Sarwar would make a better first minister, compared with 31 per cent for Yousaf.

Poll source: Holyrood
 
So what you are telling me is that The Squad in Scotland is in charge, and it does not have any female members? Shameful.
 
Back
Top