Mark Levin calls Ron Paul "Ru Paul" on Fox News

[acptulsa]

Mark who?

Wasn't Mark anybody, was it? I thought it was Carl Levin.

 

[Anti Federalist]

I'm getting blistered in-district right now for my banning warrantless checkpoints bill. MAD respect for Dr Paul - this ain't easy!

Can you post examples?

 

[acptulsa]

Can you post examples?

If they're from his constituents, I don't think he should re-post them here. If they're from lobbying groups, on the other hand...

 

[Anti Federalist]

Wasn't Mark anybody, was it? I thought it was Carl Levin.

Yeah that...

I'm still unsure WTF this guy is, or where he came from, other than some ill defined role as Shamity's more annoying, more nasal, more idiotic, doppelgänger.

 

[Anti Federalist]

If they're from his constituents, I don't think he should re-post them here. If they're from lobbying groups, on the other hand...

That's why I was asking.

 

[1000-points-of-fright]

I love the irony of him shrieking and calling people "Statists!" all the time on his radio show. Look in the mirror, buddy!

I used to listen to him every once in a while before and during the 2008 elections. I used to listen to Rush too and I never ever heard either one of them use the term "statist" (or "liberty" for that matter) until after Obama got elected. Now they use it constantly.

The only place I saw the term used with any frequency was on this forum.

 

[Matt Collins]

Neal Boortz?

He is more neocon than anything these days. He used to be a LP member.

 

[low preference guy]

I used to listen to him every once in a while before and during the 2008 elections. I used to listen to Rush too and I never ever heard either one of them use the term "statist" (or "liberty" for that matter) until after Obama got elected. Now they use it constantly.

The only place I saw the term used with any frequency was on this forum.

haha. i've been using it since before high school.

 

[Justinjj1]

It's funny seeing all the same posters in this thread, who a few months ago were claiming that Levin is "coming around" and "an ally to the liberty movement."

I was even negative repped for talking bad about Levin.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?262265-Rand-is-on-Mark-Levin-now!/page3

 

[Immortal Technique]

i couldnt find any word of this interview anywhere on the web except here, so what show was it, what time and the date.

 

[jclay2]

It's funny seeing all the same posters in this thread, who a few months ago were claiming that Levin is "coming around" and "an ally to the liberty movement."

I was even negative repped for talking bad about Levin.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?262265-Rand-is-on-Mark-Levin-now!/page3

+rep, there you go.

 

[GunnyFreedom]

Can you post examples?

It's centered around a newspaper that tightly controls their content through paid access.

 

[Sola_Fide]

It's funny seeing all the same posters in this thread, who a few months ago were claiming that Levin is "coming around" and "an ally to the liberty movement."

I was even negative repped for talking bad about Levin.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?262265-Rand-is-on-Mark-Levin-now!/page3

I think you are referring to my post in that thread. Well, in any case, I didn't say that "Levin was coming around to the Liberty position, I just said "that Ron and Rand are trying to bring conservatives to a more principled position, and we shouldn't shut anybody out."

By the way, you posted this in that thread:

Why do you think Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Bill Kristol, Mike Huckabee, et.al, are being so friendly with Rand? Do you really think it's because they have suddenly seen the light and realized their mistakes? I think it's because they do not see Rand as a threat to the military-industrial complex or to AIPAC. And I believe that it is Rand that has moved more towards their positions and not vice-versa.

I don't agree with that^^^.

 

[anaconda]

Glad to know that Neil interrupted this idiot.

Not glad that he had a very ignorant, cowardly, and spiteful little man on his show..

 

[anaconda]

Wasn't Mark anybody, was it? I thought it was Carl Levin.

No Levin's name starts with "M." I think it's "Muammar...."

 

[QuinnR]

He is more neocon than anything these days. He used to be a LP member.

I'd say that he's with us on just about everything except foreign policy. He doesn't even think that doctors should have to be licensed, so he can't be that much of a neocon. I would say that Mike Church is a better Libertarian than Boortz, but Boortz is more lively and entertaining.

 

[acptulsa]

No Levin's name starts with "M." I think it's "Muammar...."

Nope. We finally figured it out. Took long enough.

Vladimir Levin.

 

[Matt Collins]

I would say that Mike Church is a better Libertarian than Boortz, but Boortz is more lively and entertaining.

Really?

I would say that Mike Church knows his history better than Boortz, and is also more solid on the anti-federalist front.

But I don't think Boortz is more lively than Mike Church. Mike is on fire. Boortz might be a bit more "intellectual" (he is a lawyer after all), but I think Mike is a better orator too.

 

[jct74]

Here's the tube (@ 0:55)

 

[QuinnR]

Really?

I would say that Mike Church knows his history better than Boortz, and is also more solid on the anti-federalist front.

But I don't think Boortz is more lively than Mike Church. Mike is on fire. Boortz might be a bit more "intellectual" (he is a lawyer after all), but I think Mike is a better orator too.

Hmmm. I haven't listened to Church in awhile. I'll have to check him out and get a good grasp of him.