Mark Levin calls Ron Paul "Ru Paul" on Fox News

Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Messages
1,706
Neil Cavuto has Mark Levin on right now talking about the Constitutionality of the Libyan airstrikes.

Of course, Mark is saying there's nothing wrong with bombing the hell out of Libya without Congress approving it.

He said "you have people like Kucinich and Ru Paul going around and saying what they think"...Then Cavuto interrupted him and said "Mark, it's Ron Paul". Levin then basically was just like "whatever, you know what I meant".

:mad:
 
I love the irony of him shrieking and calling people "Statists!" all the time on his radio show. Look in the mirror, buddy!
 
The best part was right after essentially shitting on the Constitution and saying there's nothing unconstitutional about Libya, he went ahead and said he wants a "true constitutional conservative" for the Republican nominee in 2012.

What the hell is that?
 
Did you really think all that "Ru Paul" bullshit last time around was accidental?

:(

it had a source and a purpose
:mad:
 
good for Neal. Mind you, Ron is much better for his ratings than Levin.

Levin pretty much demonstrates his level of debate capability with that.

It is fine if people disagree with Ron, that is their prerogative. But when they disrespect him, my hackles go up.

If ever a man deserved respect for all he has tried to do for the country in the face of ridicule, it is Ron.

I think Rand is terrific, but he didn't have to grind it out day after day for 30 years without a cheering crowd. That takes uncommon character.
 
Last edited:
Shutter at the thought.

Shutter?

images


or, shutter?

images
 
I'm a fan of Neil Cavuto. He's always respectful and isn't a blowhard like most TV personalities.

I agree. In fact, I like a lot of the staff/commentators of Fox Business (Neil crosses Fox Business and Fox News). David Asman has Ron Paul on a lot, obviously Judge Napolitano, Liz Claman, Jonathan Hoenig, etc.

Sometimes we door a poor job of separating the wheat from the chaff, and summarily condemn entire organizations as being Fed Schills or NWO-whatevers. While every media outlet has people who we agree hold opinions that suck or are frankly anti-American in the traditional originalist sense, there are good folks too. I think it hurts our cause when people metaphorically sh*t on all of them. Send a nice feedback email once in a while when one of them has Ron Paul on for a good discussion. Send a constructive feedback email when you disagree with them, but no need to be an asshole. Certainly some of them deserve a brow-beating at times, but they're, in my view, anti-productive and a waste of your time. Even CNBC has a few good people. Rick Santelli and Michelle Caruso-Cabrera are very free-markets oriented and Ron Paul fans, even Kudlow is and really conducts awesome interviews with Ron Paul.

Food for thought.
 
We have great fun embarassing the hell out of the MSM when they say something that's obviously not true. They'd be happy for any opportunity to return the favor.
 
its easy for these guys to be against typical dem spending programs. when things get a little thornier they say "nope too hard for me" and these are really pretty useless people in the fight for liberty, in the end.
 
Back
Top