Marines told to disarm before Panetta speech

Joined
Jun 2, 2007
Messages
2,776
Marines told to disarm before Panetta speech
http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/14/marines-told-to-disarm-before-panetta-speech/?hpt=hp_t3
U.S. Marines waiting for Defense Secretary Leon Panetta to speak at Camp Leatherneck in Afghanistan Wednesday were ordered to leave the room and place their weapons outside.

The request, relayed by Sgt. Maj. Brandon Hall, was unusual because it's not customary to disarm for a defense secretary visit, but the Marines did as they were told. About two dozen unarmed Afghan soldiers also were in attendance.


"Somebody got itchy, that's all I've got to say. Somebody got itchy; we just adjust


Well this isn't looking good is it? since when was it did this happen? i guess when Clinton was president when back then that this happened, but this in Afghanistan.

Is quite surprising.

So what you make of this?
 
In Kansas these are "gun free zones". Businesses are allowed to post a "gun buster" sign telling everyone that no one inside is armed. I find it comical that he is now afraid of the military he leads. On second thought, it's kind of sad.

WJH
 
He didn't want to risk their reaction when he said international approval is more important than Congressional approval for when the US Military should invade a country?
 
"Marines, in a tent waiting to acclaim Leon Panetta on his visit to Afghanistan, were ordered to disarm before he would show up. Afghan soldiers have never been allowed to carry weapons on such occasions. Now, like the Soviets at the end of their empire, American officials are afraid that their own troops may take them out."

via Lew Rockwell
 
"Marines, in a tent waiting to acclaim Leon Panetta on his visit to Afghanistan, were ordered to disarm before he would show up. Afghan soldiers have never been allowed to carry weapons on such occasions. Now, like the Soviets at the end of their empire, American officials are afraid that their own troops may take them out."

via Lew Rockwell

And they have the nerve to call us sheep:

 
"Gun Control" enforcement for the armed services in a war theater. This boggles me. Not sure what to make of it yet. Has this ever been customary?
 
That General would have looked real stupid if a motor attack happened and they hit the huge pile of weapons they stacked in perfect groups so close together, then having a battalion of unarmed Marines running around.

Like others have said, it seems the elite is having trouble trusting their sheep.
 
maybe my tweeting had a role in getting this story out, I pointed this part out (the disarmed troops) - which was not emphasized in the story at all, but buried many paragraphs deep - when I first read the story, and an hour later it's the featured headline on Drudge and elsewhere
 
"Gun Control" enforcement for the armed services in a war theater. This boggles me. Not sure what to make of it yet. Has this ever been customary?

Frequently in the last 50 years. There were "red block" zones in Vietnam (instead of a magazine in weapons, painted red wood blocks were inserted in the magazine wells, so everyone knew the weapon was safe).
 
Back
Top