Marijuana reform initiatives on the ballot in 2016 - Official results thread

Since I moved to New Hampshire as part of the Free State Project, I'm most excited about Maine and Mass passing it. New England and the West Coast have been leading the charge on this issues, as least with polls. Though, I assume the medical marijuana ballot issues are the most likely to pass since the vast majority of voters support that issue, and it mostly is designed to help seniors, vets, and people with cancer, all groups almost everyone claims to support.

That said, CA passing it would have the most impact. Plus, it would help CA with it's always pathetic rating on the Freedom in the 50 States report :)
 
I'm pretty sure the only state mentioned in OP that requires more than 50% is Florida, which requires a 60% vote to pass.



Speaking of Florida, here's what Sheldon Adelson is doing with his million bucks that he recently donated, trying to scare the $#@! out of the voters there.

These commercials were made by someone that is um, um, confused. Is it up to 5,000 medical cannabis locations or 2,000? Is it up to 20 times stronger or 10 times stronger than it once was? Unfortunately, the voters won't see the commercials back to back like that. Thank you for your service!
 
new poll on Massachusetts marijuana legalization - 53% support, 40% oppose

According to the new WBZ-TV, WBZ NewsRadio, UMass Amherst Poll poll of 700 likely Massachusetts voters (margin of error +/-4.3%), Question 4 on the November ballot – “An initiative petition for a law relative to the regulation and taxation of marijuana” – which would legalize recreational use of pot, enjoys a 53-to-40 percent lead, with seven-percent still unsure.

http://boston.cbslocal.com/2016/09/...ot-legalization-massachusetts-wbz-umass-poll/




WBUR poll earlier this month showed 50-45 lead
http://www.wbur.org/politicker/2016/09/13/wbur-ballot-question-poll
 
Last edited:
latest poll on Nevada marijuana legalization - 53% support, 39% oppose


KTNV/RASMUSSEN POLL: Voters favor legalizing recreational pot, plan to reorganize school district

Riley Snyder
Sep 21, 2016




A new KTNV-TV 13 Action News/Rasmussen Reports poll finds a majority of Nevada voters favor a ballot measure legalizing recreational marijuana use and support a new redistricting plan for the Clark County School District.

The poll of 800 likely voters found a 53 to 39 percent margin of support for legalizing recreational marijuana, which will be on the November ballot as Question 2.

Polling results show modest increases in support for the ballot initiative since a July KTNV-TV 13 Action News/Rasmussen Reports poll indicated a 50 to 41 split in favor of legalizing recreational use of marijuana. Rasmussen polls historically tilt Republican, according to a FiveThirtyEight ranking of polling groups.

...


http://www.ktnv.com/news/political/...tional-pot-plan-to-reorganize-school-district





BTW - don't legalize marijuana in Nevada or your kids may die.




 
http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news...d-by-majority-in-state-new-poll-shows-8624219

A recent poll, sponsored by the Arizona Republic and Arizona State University's Morrison Institute of Public Policy and the school's Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication, reveals that 50 percent of voters favor Prop 205, while 39.9 percent oppose it, and 10.2 percent are undecided.

It's the first poll in which people were asked specifically about the upcoming proposition that showed majority support. A poll released by OH Predictive Insights on September 6 showed the measure losing 51 percent to 40 percent, with 9 percent undecided.

Even with the new poll, it appears the election will be a nail biter.

I've seen a few big red NO on 205 signs around. I don't recall seeing any YES on 205 signs yet.
 
Last edited:
...

BTW - don't legalize marijuana in Nevada or your kids may die.







I guess these ridiculous TV ads in Nevada are not having their desired effect on the public. New Suffolk poll shows marijuana legalization support at 57%, with only 33% opposed. Same polling organization in mid-August showed a lead of only 48-43, so it appears lead has increased significantly recently. Sheldon Adelson must be shitting his Depends right now. :D

http://www.suffolk.edu/news/67667.php
http://www.suffolk.edu/documents/SUPRC/9_30_2016_marginals.pdf
 
Last edited:
new poll on Massachusetts marijuana legalization - 53% support, 40% oppose



http://boston.cbslocal.com/2016/09/...ot-legalization-massachusetts-wbz-umass-poll/




WBUR poll earlier this month showed 50-45 lead
http://www.wbur.org/politicker/2016/09/13/wbur-ballot-question-poll

I listened to the NPR debate on this yesterday. Apparently, CO was opt-in and this is opt-out, but only if there is a local referendum on the issue, and the voters of the town vote to opt-out. So this is potentially substantially better for freedom than the CO laws on the subject. MA already has the best decriminalization law in the nation, so I'm not surprised. Let's hope this passes.
 
looks like the marijuana reform movement has a new celebrity ally this election season :D


Justin Bieber Condemns Big Pharma For Blocking Medical Marijuana Legalization
“We all need to pay attention.”

Landess Kearns
10/05/2016

Medical marijuana advocates have a new ally ― and he’s tweeting his support to a massive audience.

Justin Bieber criticized pharmaceutical companies on Twitter Sunday to raise awareness of the industry’s attempts to block medical marijuana legislation.

“This is important,” the singer wrote. “I’m going to be talking more about this. We all need to pay attention.” And with 88.6 million followers, it’s safe to say he got some people to pay attention.



The tweet links to an ATTN: video that concisely explains the fight between pharmaceutical companies and medical marijuana advocates.

“Drug companies are worried because marijuana is an alternative to painkillers,” the video says.

...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/justin-bieber-medical-marijuana_us_57f4569ae4b04c71d6f0cdb5?
 
Last edited:
New poll from Las Vegas Review-Journal shows legalization leading by only one point, 47 to 46.
http://www.reviewjournal.com/politics/election-2016/nevada-pot-ballot-measure-too-close-call

I don't trust it though coming from Sheldon Adelson's newspaper, and two other recent polls showed a significant lead.


Also, new poll in Massachusetts shows Question 4 is leading 52-42.
http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/10/wneu_poll_majority_of_voters_b.html



All five legalization initiatives are now leading by the way.


 
MAn,, I would commit but just got sum premo shit yo. Can't feel my face... Wow.. this aint grandpas bud... What that is??? Space weed man.
 




Not bad. Not great either. I know the politicians, regulators and other recipients of tax money are drooling. But it is a tiny increase in freedom for small personal growers and smokers.
 
drug-spending-v-addiction.gif
 
Boogity-Boogity. Reject freedom and become a social justice warrior.

MPHA Statement on Marijuana Ballot Initiative (Question*4)

https://mapublichealth.org/2016/10/...paign=August+2016+Newsletter&utm_medium=email

MPHA has evaluated the available research literature and listened to both proponents and opponents of the question. After careful study, MPHA has concluded that the ballot initiative does not contain sufficient public health protections and that the potential dangers far outweigh any potential benefits. *Further, we have found little evidence that this ballot question would have a substantive impact on the racial discrimination that has been a stain on our country’s criminal justice system for far too long. *MPHA urges voters to reject this ballot question and join us to support more meaningful criminal justice reform that will reverse the institutionalized discrimination in our drug policies and protect public health.
 


Foes of legalized marijuana are amassing a huge amount of cash in a last-minute bid to quash the measure.

The latest figures show Arizonans for Responsible Drug Policy has so far collected more than $2.7 million. Most significant, more than $900,000 of that has come in the past three weeks as different polls have shown the fate of Proposition 205 could swing either way.

Whether any of that is having an effect remains to be seen.

The most recent survey, released Monday, shows 43 percent of those questioned in support and 47 percent opposed. That could leave the outcome up to the 10 percent who told OH Predictive Insights they had not made up their mind.

But what’s significant is that the same pollster, using the same methodology, had found Proposition 205 trailing by a larger margin of 40 to 51 percent just a month earlier.

Now comes the big fiscal push.

Less than a week ago the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry poured $498,000 into the anti-205 measure. That is more than four times as much as the business group had provided since the campaign started.

There’s also a new $115,000 donation from Virginia-based SAM Action, short for Smart Approach to Marijuana, a group that has opposed legalization efforts in many other states.

The pro-205 effort benefited from a $110,000 donation two weeks ago from Dr. Bronner’s Magic Soaps.

I've seen a few pro-205 signs and ads. This one aired recently, and made the point about how prohibition helps the cartels.



 


If Arizona’s ballot measure passes, pot shops would soon arise in a place that has long been a center of drug smuggling. In cities such as Nogales, smugglers are seen almost daily scaling the border fence with backpacks of weed.

“This is a day-in and day-out fight,” said Col. Frank Milstead, head of the Arizona Department of Public Safety. “I can’t tell you that a day goes by that we don’t actually interdict somebody smuggling some sort of drug into the state.”

How drug cartels respond to legalization has been a focus of debate in Arizona.

Law enforcement leaders say the change will strengthen cartels, allowing them to infiltrate the legal pot market and driving them to sell more hard drugs. Advocates of legalization say it will undercut the cartels by eliminating a key segment of their business.

Carlos Alfaro, the deputy campaign manager for Proposition 205, says legalization in other states has already led to a drop in marijuana seizures by the Border Patrol.

From fiscal year 2011 to 2015, the number of seizures made by the agency nationwide fell by 39 percent. In the Tucson sector, at one point the busiest smuggling corridor in the nation, seizures fell by 28 percent, according to Border Patrol statistics.

“Now cartels have competition,” Alfaro said. “They have to compete with legitimate business in the U.S. with product that is more pure, with regulations on the shelf and prices.”
[...]
For now, cannabis remains the primary drug seized on the border, Beeson said.

All around the border, cartels hire lookouts who sit atop hills and mountains, watching for law enforcement activity. They disguise trucks under camouflage deep in the Arizona desert, stripping them of their insides and filling them top to bottom with drugs. Most recently, smugglers have turned to homemade cannons to launch giant loads of marijuana over the border fence.

A few weeks ago, authorities near the border found a 6-foot plastic-wrapped cylinder filled with 110 pounds of pot after hearing a loud boom, Milstead said. Detectives concluded that it had been launched by air cannon and landed about 250 yards from the border fence.

The region’s roads and highways are also peppered with Border Patrol checkpoints, where agents look for drugs and smugglers. Those checkpoints will remain even if pot is made legal.

That’s because marijuana is still illegal under federal law, which trumps state regulations. Border Patrol agents at checkpoints would seize marijuana from anyone who had it regardless of its legal status in the state, a spokesman said. But it’s unlikely they would detain anyone.
[...]
Local law enforcement officials say legal pot will present other obstacles, such as impaired drivers. They worry about traffic fatalities, which they say have gone up in Colorado as a result of marijuana, and they say that making drug arrests would be much harder because the smell of cannabis would no longer provide probable cause to search someone.

Retired Drug Enforcement Administration agent Finn Selander, a proponent of legalization, agrees that crime organizations will turn to other drugs, but he said marijuana is their most lucrative moneymaker and legalization would still cripple them.

The possibility that cartels will turn to something else to sell is a given but a “lame excuse” to oppose legal pot, Selander said.

“That’s what organized crime is all about is to find something they can peddle,” he said.
 
Thanks Lucille. That's a lot of money the opposition is lining up in Arizona, I think it's going to be a real close one. Speaking of that, look who else is throwing in big bucks to maintain prohibition there and keep the profits flowing. Doesn't get much sleazier than this really.


Prison Food Company Funds Legal Marijuana Opposition

BY TOM ANGELL
OCTOBER 11TH, 2016

A company that makes money selling food to prisons is helping to bankroll the effort to defeat marijuana legalization, a review of new campaign finance records shows.

Services Group of America, whose subsidiary Food Services of America prepares meals for correctional facilities, gave $80,000 late last month to a campaign committee opposing the legal cannabis measure on Arizona’s November ballot.

Also giving big to keep cannabis prohibition on the books in Arizona is the state Chamber of Commerce, which dropped $498,000 into the campaign last week.

The new donations are on top of the $500,000 that opioid maker Insys Therapeutics gave in late August to oppose legalization in Arizona. The alcohol industry is on board, too: The Arizona Wine and Spirits Wholesale Association donated $10,000 earlier this year. And SAM Action, the campaign arm of Smart Approaches to Marijuana, contributed $115,000 last week.

But the support from Services Group of America in particular raises questions about the company’s interest in maintaining prohibition. If marijuana were legalized and fewer people were arrested, charged and sentenced to prison for it, there’d likely be fewer mouths behind bars for Food Services of America to feed.

...

read more:
http://www.marijuana.com/blog/news/2016/10/prison-food-company-funds-legal-marijuana-opposition/
 
Last edited:
also in Arizona...


Former DEA Agents Rally In Support Of Marijuana Legalization In Arizona
Because they believe law enforcement has more important things to do.

by Emily Tate
10/12/2016

Two unlikely proponents of marijuana legalization stopped by Arizona State University Wednesday to campaign on behalf of Proposition 205, the state’s initiative to legalize and regulate weed.

A pair of retired agents from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration encouraged some of ASU’s 80,000 college students to vote “yes” on Prop. 205. Their appearance was organized by the Campaign to Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol and timed to coincide with the beginning of early voting in the state.

The former special agents, Finn Selander and Michael Capasso, were on hand to speak to students and explain why they support an initiative that runs counter to their former careers as drug warriors.

“It was a huge success,” Capasso told The Huffington Post. “They were interested, and they liked my perspective — coming from the DEA. Most of the people I spoke to were thumbs-up on Prop. 205.”

...

read more:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/legalize-marijuana-arizona_us_57fe7c98e4b0e8c198a5794e



one of them appears in an ad


 
...the issue of marijuana prohibition, in general, clearly exposes a lot of republicrats as goddamned fools...especially republicans, imo...as they are the ones frequently foaming about their love and respect
rolleyes.gif
for the constitution, 'liberty', etc...as if this stinking 'war on drugs' is in harmony with the con. or is harmonious with 'liberty'... :rolleyes:

...drug war pigs, snitches/finks, helicopters, lawyers, courtrooms, judges, jails, jailers, peepee checkers, probation officers, drug counselors, etc. hanger$-on galore...and yet many of these fool republicrat drug warriors will b!tch and moan about 'big government' and 'high taxes'...
rolleyes.gif


...these goddamned fool republicrat politicians and their dumbass supporters are so stooooooooooooooooooooopid, so corrupt, so close-minded, etc., that THEY WON'T EVEN REPEAL THE LAWS PROHIBITING/INTERFERING WITH THE GROWING OF HEMP!!!...a completely harmless, extremely useful, beneficial, etc., plant

...in some 80 years of this [federal] republicrat 'war on drugs' americans have gone from a people who largely didn't even know what marijuana was to a country now where the republicrats have a hard time fielding candidates who haven't been photographed sucking on a bong at college!..
wink.gif
...and yet the goddamned fools want to 'drug-war harder'...
angry.gif
...worse than stooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooopid...insane, evil...

...government officials in maine are now making the concerted claim that 'voting yes on 1 will allow children to possess pot'... :rolleyes:

....goddamned. republicrat. fools.
:mad:...btw, you maine lepage 'liberty' :rolleyes: republicans: STFU you gd fools...

...ah...that felt good...thank-you, rpf!..
 
Last edited:
yep, Maine governor and Attorney General are tag-teaming to try to scare the shit out of people.


Paul LePage Warns Maine Against ‘Deadly’ Marijuana Legalization In Over-The-Top Video
The governor lied and exaggerated in a bid to sway voters against a ballot initiative.

Daniel Marans
10/14/2016




America’s most ignorant governor is at it again.

Maine Gov. Paul LePage (R) released a false and misleading video on Thursday in an attempt to convince residents to vote “no” on “Question 1,” a marijuana legalization referendum on the state’s ballot in November.

“Question 1 is not just bad for Maine, it can be deadly,” LePage warns, before claiming traffic fatalities have gone up in Colorado since the state legalized recreational pot.

In the video, LePage also asserts that marijuana is three times stronger than it was several decades ago. He then links the drug to the state’s serious heroin and opioid epidemic, alleging that “people addicted to marijuana are three times more likely to be addicted to heroin.”

He goes on to describe a dystopian future in which children and pets die from accidentally consuming “marijuana snacks,” and in which drug culture impinges on “schools, daycare centers and churches.”

“They will smoke weed and sell pot at state fairs,” he adds. “Businesses could not fire employees for using marijuana.”

...


read more:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...uana-legalization_us_5800f855e4b06e0475945215



Maine AG says Question 1 would allow children to have pot

By Darren Fishell
October 13, 2016

PORTLAND, Maine — Maine Attorney General Janet Mills delivered a blow to marijuana legalization advocates Thursday, issuing a revised assessment that the bill would make it legal for children to possess up to 2.5 ounces of the drug.

A Maine attorney representing advocates of the measure, Question 1 on the November ballot, said her office is wrong and that Maine law already makes it illegal for people under 21 to use marijuana. Television station WCSH first reported Mills’ assessment of the question Thursday afternoon.

The October surprise for the Question 1 campaign came after Mills’ office completed an earlier analysis of the question that on Oct. 3 was published in the secretary of state’s voter guide, which did not explicitly address implications for children.

Mills was attending a meeting in Baxter State Park on Thursday and was unavailable to speak to the Bangor Daily News about that earlier analysis.

The new analysis echoed statements from Cumberland County District Attorney Stephanie Anderson during a televised debate about the question and a radio interview with host Ray Richardson.

...

read more:
http://bangordailynews.com/2016/10/...-question-1-would-allow-children-to-have-pot/
 
Last edited:
Back
Top