March 3rd Republican debate on Fox News - 9 pm ET

If you are anything but a hardline neocon evangelical you are not welcome there.

I revised my post after reading what he did to get booted from Freerepublic. I knew they were pretty neocon but was not as aware of the religious bit. I didn't get as strong of neocon impression from AR-15 though
 
Damn what did you on AR-15 do to incite such fury? I hope you stick around here :)

I was intellectually torturing them in a lowkey way. Exposing cognitive dissonance at every turn when I could. Introducing topics that were taboo. The mods flushed me not soon after when they realized I wasn't going to engage in a titanic shouting match with personal attacks and little to no information to back me up. These people don't like the slow simmers. I got into a few fights about the Uniform Code for Military Justice and what it entails.
 
Last edited:
I was intellectually torturing them in a lowkey way. Exposing cognitive dissonance at every turn when I could. Introducing topics that were taboo. The mods flushed me not soon after when they realized I wasn't going to engage in a titanic shouting match. These people don't like the slow simmers. I got into a few fights about the Uniform Code for Military Justice and what it entails.

That sounds like it would have made for some good reading :D
 
I revised my post after reading what he did to get booted from Freerepublic. I knew they were pretty neocon but was not as aware of the religious bit. I didn't get as strong of neocon impression from AR-15 though

FR is really weird. To this day I still find some very interesting articles there. It is a source of the kind of information you can only get from going around the mainstream media.

At the same time, the comments there are at the holy fuck level of rabid police state bootlicking and war propaganda cheering, with enough Jesusing thrown in to make you vomit.
 
Kahless is an important guy.

Ccrm5JxVIAEBti9.jpg
 
Waiting for their authoritarianism to get triggered. A lot of people are actually very authoritarian, but it takes fear for them to really show it. Donald Trump is bringing out a lot of these authoritarian sentiments in people by pushing fear—especially a fear of brown people. They want a strong police state because they're tired of those "uppity blacks" protesting against a crooked police system. They want a wall along the border because they actually believe that it's the fault of brown people that they're struggling instead of the very system they're enabling. They want to keep Muslims out of the country and torture/kill them and their family members because they're under the delusion that terrorists are running rampant in this country, despite the fact that the people they unquestionably support—the police—are far more likely to kill Americans. To top it all off, these same people are very likely to favor military action, which is by far the largest reason why anyone would want to attack this country.

Try making sense of that.


No! They hate us for our freedom. DERP.
 
If you are anything but a hardline neocon evangelical you are not welcome there.

I got kicked off free republic in 2001 for posting on the pedophile roman catholic scandal. Traditionally. evangelical meant a type of protestant, but the site has a very large catholic block. Oddly enough, the only other person posting on the "pre-widely known" pedophile scandal was a catholic. Needlessly to say, I became more vocal on every site I could. Even made a newspaper - I hate being censured. A friend of mine from the 90s got kicked off the same time for entirely different reasons. We won't talking to each other a the time. I think he went on to have a tv show or talk radio on some minor channel. not sure.

The place has been that way since it began.

I supported Ron Paul in 1988. I've taken unpopular truthful positions all my life. We saw Ron Paul at his Florida convention his last run, and Kentucky is my state, so Rand Paul is our senator. We also were at the state convention that year as spectators, and we are at the pre meeting of Ron Paul supporters (I still have my convention rules photocopy what to do around here somewhere).
 
FR is really weird. To this day I still find some very interesting articles there. It is a source of the kind of information you can only get from going around the mainstream media.

At the same time, the comments there are at the holy fuck level of rabid police state bootlicking and war propaganda cheering, with enough Jesusing thrown in to make you vomit.

they are kind of manipulative on the facts and slant, so I find it worthless other then to see what they are pushing for sometimes. I haven't looked in years.

Principles are a lot more important than what propaganda someone is pushing, so no need to.
 
@SpiritOf1776_J4 do you remember the whole "Deep in the Hurtgen Forest" fiasco? It was a preview of FR's future, except without the truth tellings and mea culpa at the end.
 
I don't believe anyone is behind trump or special conspiracy.

Overestimating the intelligence in a society based on mob democracy and media is a mistake. Things are just as stupid and plain as they seem, and the fact that so many people can't see the obvious is the measure of the lack of intelligence.

There is no reforming the system, because the idea of >>state<< government is evil. It is wrong to say that stealing is ok if government does it, murder is ok if government does it, force is ok if government does it. You can't reform an idea like that, it is utterly corrupt. It is as the bible says - choosing a "king" (state government) is a rejection of God. The best thing to do is not run for office to "reform that", but advocate getting rid of it and why. Everything else is chopping at the little branches.

State government is an idol promoting doing evil with its ok. I'm darn convinced the bible talks about it in those terms, but the neocons and vast majority don't see it. The best thing to do is just leave it and encourage others to do so and explain why.
 
not sure. Last I remember, Michael Rivero (my old friend at one time) got booted - we had a falling out a year before that; and also 9-11 - and me, oddly enough, not posting on it. I was posting on the pedophile scandal at the time. Partly because I was tired of the 90s and clinton scandals (we could use those memories now, people have a short memory of the complete #%$% of the clintons), and partly because I buried my father on 9-11 - who died the friday before. It was an incredibly bad time. I posted on that once before on daily paul under my real name a few years ago. took a long time to get over. Sometime before dec 2001 I believe I was gone.

I've been active the whole time generally after that. I've probably worked with and have the (old) numbers of 3-4 people at wnd from shared news research or stories. Before freerepublic, I had other avenues to share information - freerepublic didn't last too long :) 6-9 months?

I went through a period of not liking wnd too much either - too neocon, anti-paul, and pro israel in the biased sort of way. Lately, I don't really have a news source or site.
 
Agreed. He will probably release the remaining pages of the 9/11 report just for this reason alone.

I sure hope so, but I'm not convinced we will get anything new. But I am enjoying seeing Trump land into the same people that caused Ron Paul trouble and give them their own. I'd like to see it against Hillary too - if anyone deserves it..

The population needs to grow up and realize that the system can't be reformed by who runs it - because using force is wrong. It needs principles.
 
Ahh.. the nostalgia. I'll never forgive the people of Iowa for abandoning him in the days before the caucus when the racism charges hit.

Ironically, I'm pretty sure we could have gotten a floor vote the last run. Now Romney - who was all for saying how that should never be done, is trying for a brokered convention - incredible.

I was here 2007 too. our blimp media director from then is my fb friend.

blimp bump.
 
Back
Top