March 3rd Republican debate on Fox News - 9 pm ET

Trump just got exposed as a CFR puppet who is weak on immigration. Tonight's debate probably just cost him the nomination.

If he was anyone else that would be a requirement for the nomination.
 
Widely known? He's getting numerous death threats? His star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame was recently defaced with a swastika? Do you think all of this can be easily fixed with a 'Hey Guys, I was just kidding? Can we be friends now?' He will die with the stigma of this POTUS run if he cannot win. He will be mocked as a 'Loser' as well.

I got a feeling Trump won't be missing any meals no matter what happens from here. He'll be just fine.
 
IMO, Kasich won the debate; although he looks like a skid row bumb. Trump had a terrible debate, so did little marco. Ted Cruz somehow sounds like the 4th grader in a school play.
 
It's not like he named just any CFR guy, he named the President of the Board of Directors as his go-to for defense policy.

He has mentioned Haas in the past. He probably got that one from Hillary. Anyone remember when Hilary said she would go to CFR to get her foreign policy? Trump probably thought that sounded like a good answer. Haas and Bolton are people that are presented on TV as experts, and that's where Trump gets his info.
 
Kasich was so grating as the unifier, as if the dumb people unite on bad ideas, then it's suddenly the pinnacle of the American political process. My experience tells me that the word 'bipartisanship' is the most dangerous term in the english language.
 
Last edited:
IMO, Kasich won the debate; although he looks like a skid row bumb. Trump had a terrible debate, so did little marco. Ted Cruz somehow sounds like the 4th grader in a school play.

Catching the booger only helped that image. Looks like the new plan is to quickly dump Rubio and push everything to Cruz.
 
He has mentioned Haas in the past. He probably got that one from Hillary. Anyone remember when Hilary said she would go to CFR to get her foreign policy? Trump probably thought that sounded like a good answer. Haas and Bolton are people that are presented on TV as experts, and that's where Trump gets his info.

I did more research and found that Trump actually met with Haass (according to the latter, anyway) so it was not a random name picked out of a hat.
 
He has mentioned Haas in the past. He probably got that one from Hillary. Anyone remember when Hilary said she would go to CFR to get her foreign policy? Trump probably thought that sounded like a good answer. Haas and Bolton are people that are presented on TV as experts, and that's where Trump gets his info.

Isn't he simply trying to appease CFR?
 
Kasich was so grating as the unifier, as if the dumb people unite on bad ideas, then it's suddenly the pinnacle of the American political process. My experience tells me that the word 'bipartisanship' is the most dangerous term in the english language.

I sympathize with that. But having Kasich spoil the Trump nomination....then regardless of if he wins or loses to Clinton....I think we could draw a contrast with him in 2020 for a challenge....because though I don't think he would do anything crazy, he would assuredly be regarded as "moderate" or "liberal" because he is. That gives us oppertunity to play to the rowdy sheeple out there.

Or, if he does a decent job, maybe Eisenhowery....then we can just ride out a semi-uneventful presidency until 2024.

None of the GOP candidates are good, but I think Rand has a point. First we "must do no harm".
 
IMO, Ted Cruz blew it tonight. Not that I like TedGoldmanSachs, but.............. if I was developing his strategy, rather than going after Trump; he should have delivered a knock out punch to little rubio. It would have been a surprise for everyone, and Rubio would not have been prepared. Cruz should have stayed straight on Rubio's ass with his voting record, and lack there of .... taxpayer welfare for being paid to not work ... Cruz blew this opportunity to turn this into a two person race.
 
I sympathize with that. But having Kasich spoil the Trump nomination....then regardless of if he wins or loses to Clinton....I think we could draw a contrast with him in 2020 for a challenge....because though I don't think he would do anything crazy, he would assuredly be regarded as "moderate" or "liberal" because he is. That gives us oppertunity to play to the rowdy sheeple out there.

Or, if he does a decent job, maybe Eisenhowery....then we can just ride out a semi-uneventful presidency until 2024.


None of the GOP candidates are good, but I think Rand has a point. First we "must do no harm".

It would just be 4+ years of Elizabeth Warren after Kasich's done. If your plan is to give Rand in a chance in 2020 then you have to vote Democrat this time around.
 
Kasich on O'Reilly saying he will definitely win Ohio. And perform well in MI, PA, IL
 
CcrDf8WUUAEAw9k.jpg
 
Trump winning drudge report polls with HUGEEEEEEEEEEEE numbers lol. I didn't see it. I thought he fell short tonight.
 
Trump winning drudge report polls with HUGEEEEEEEEEEEE numbers lol. I didn't see it. I thought he fell short tonight.

He did, but people are pissed off enough at the establishment that they don't care.
 
Back
Top