Map breakdown

Want to know why Alecia WEBB-EDGINGTON won Kenton county, when Massie was sweeping everything else?

This is why:

2012_KY_KentonCountyUSCongressRepr4thDistrictRepcsv.png


Please help expose the fraud. Ask for a recount of a few select high vote count precincts. I hope you have kept the paper ballots!
 
What exactly is that chart showing?

I guess you have missed the 4 "Vote Flipping" threads, each with hundreds of pages:

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...or-the-occurence-of-algorithmic-vote-flipping

The lines on the above chart should be horizontal, but not necessarily perfectly flat. Some bumps on the left part of the chart are normal. The bigger the county (# of votes), the flatter the chart should be.

Here's the quick explanation. We have discovered that NATIONWIDE, in about 95% of all counties, that some "establishment" (or GOP anointed) candidates, particularly Mitt Romney have gained inexplicably over other candidates as a function of the number of votes in a precinct.

In 5% of the counties where the problem does not occur, they don't use "Central Tabulators". They add up the votes for each precinct manually with Excel.

You could take any town or county and Romney does better as a linear function of precinct size. Many people have tried to explain this with demographics.

I've personally done about 800 charts. I am very familiar with the problem.

It's a very serious problem and I am totally convinced that Massie lost in Kenton County because of this problem.

Please have a look at the vote flipping thread. Ask questions there as to not clutter up things here.
 
Uh dude. This isn't hanging chad country. She won Kenton Co. as we all expected.

If the lines were horizontal and she won, I would not be here bothering you.

I'm not asking you to accept this, but find a statistician and ask to review these charts. Explain that the X-Axis is "Cumulative Precinct Vote Tally".

Expose the election fraud. That's how we win in 2012.
 
If the lines were horizontal and she won, I would not be here bothering you.

I'm not asking you to accept this, but find a statistician and ask to review these charts. Explain that the X-Axis is "Cumulative Precinct Vote Tally".

Expose the election fraud. That's how we win in 2012.

If the lines were horizontal it would be bizarre. The lines simply show that her best precincts reported after her worst ones.
 
We won....don't start conspiracy theories. Gotta keep the fringe ideas away from Massie.

It's pretty simple statistics that you can verify yourself. No conspiracy.

In fact, we have no clue who's doing this. We're just analyzing and trying to zero in on a cause.

The statistics are absolutely overwhelming. If you don't believe it, have someone that knows statistics check it for you.

Conspiracy-wise, I'd have more of a fan club if he lost though!

I don't let a winning candidate stop me. I look for candidates (besides Ron Paul) that are "Liberty types" and thus far I have found a few attempts at stealing their election.
 
Last edited:
It's pretty simple statistics that you can verify yourself. No conspiracy.

In fact, we have no clue who's doing this. We're just analyzing and trying to zero in on a cause.

The statistics are absolutely overwhelming. If you don't believe it, have someone that knows statistics check it for you.

Conspiracy-wise, I'd have more of a fan club if he lost though!

I don't let a winning candidate stop me. I look for candidates (besides Ron Paul) that are "Liberty types" and thus far I have found a few attempts at stealing their election.

You've tried to show "attempts at stealing elections" for everything from California statewide races to everywhere else, and you even conveniently ignored a fellow who posted in a thread showing that New Zealand elections followed the exact same pattern of "flipping" which you claim shows fraud.

If they were flipping this particular county, why not all the others? It makes no logical nor common sense. The votes are all being reported independently to a central location, so your theory does not hold water.
 
If anyone flips votes it's the precinct workers. Media and reps for the parties involved are at the central reporting location. Trust me, Poll workers are not sinister here. They are group of meemaws.
 
If anyone flips votes it's the precinct workers. Media and reps for the parties involved are at the central reporting location. Trust me, Poll workers are not sinister here. They are group of meemaws.

I did exit polling at a location with 5 elderly women who tried to keep feeding me doughnuts and cookies. They were sweet.
 
Not to mention that paper ballots are not used, it keeps the numbers on a rolling printout, and on a flash drive. At the end of the day they compare the central unit to the printout and flash drive, then a separate tally is kept in some hardcopy form. All these are called into the County Clerks office and then dropped off for confirmation.

There is also a ledger book in which everyone must sign-in to give an idea of how many votes there are.

None of the machines are networked, and their software is loaded months beforehand (so much that candidates who have retired are still on the ballot locally) and has no signs of tampering for Rand or Massie.

This is just a conspiracy, from what I understand the exit polls at these locations confirmed a loss in Kenton county (the county I was most worried about, with Campbell)
 
Not to mention that paper ballots are not used, it keeps the numbers on a rolling printout, and on a flash drive. At the end of the day they compare the central unit to the printout and flash drive, then a separate tally is kept in some hardcopy form. All these are called into the County Clerks office and then dropped off for confirmation.

There is also a ledger book in which everyone must sign-in to give an idea of how many votes there are.

None of the machines are networked, and their software is loaded months beforehand (so much that candidates who have retired are still on the ballot locally) and has no signs of tampering for Rand or Massie.

This is just a conspiracy, from what I understand the exit polls at these locations confirmed a loss in Kenton county (the county I was most worried about, with Campbell)

They compare the total count for each precinct with the central count for that precinct. That's the problem. Because vote flipping keeps the totals the same. They don't check the individual candidate counts. That's they way to do it in most places.

It's not conspiratorial. It's just math. Ask a statistician to give you the odds of a chart looking like Kenton county. Multiply that with the similar probability of about 800 charts from other counties.
 
Back
Top