You're purposely leaving out the most important part of that stat. What percentage of riders wear helmets? If it's something like 70%+ of them, then your data is skewed because obviously more would die with helmets on.
I posted the link.
I am purposely doing nothing, other than providing the information.
http://www.webbikeworld.com/Motorcycle-Safety/crash.htm
1998 Motorcycle Accident Statistics:
2,284 motorcyclists died and approximately 49,000 were injured in highway crashes in the United States.
Per mile traveled in 1998, a motorcyclist is approximately 16 times more likely to die in a crash than an automobile occupant. And 3x (times) as likely to be injured.
Head injury is a leading cause of death in motorcycle crashes.
In 1998, 46% of fatally injured motorcycle drivers were not wearing helmets at the time of the crash.
This means 54% were wearing helmets. more than half.
NHTSA estimates that motorcycle helmets reduce the likelihood of a fatality by 29% in a crash.
In 1998, 41% of all motorcycle drivers involved in fatal crashes were speeding.
That means 59% were NOT speeding
Nearly one out of five motorcycle drivers (18%) involved in fatal crashes in 1998 was operating with an invalid license at the time of the collision.
82% were licensed drivers
Motorcycle drivers involved in fatal crashes in 1998 had higher intoxication rates than any other type of motor vehicle driver at 31%.
Those statistics are in question
In 1998, 500 motorcyclists lives were saved due to helmet usage; 307 could have been saved.
Arbitrary opinion
oops,, I said 1996,,it is 1998
