MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT: Lawyers for Ron Paul Lawsuit NOTE: Having the lawsuit not up 4 debate

[LibertyEagle]

Apparently, he's a realist with a track record of 1-0.

As far as this being something "taking over the Paul Campaign," that statement itself makes me suspicious. Why can't they do their thing without claiming they're taking over something that doesn't belong to them? Or why wouldn't they say they are supporting the Paul Campaign or say they are supporting delegates?

Also, they are "taking over the Paul Campaign" and fighting for everyone's delegates? I understand that latter is the right thing to do, but there's no reason to make the former statement if that is your intent.

I agree. That part bothered me too.

 

[liberty2897]

Sorry if this was already posted. I didn't read through every single page of this thread.



http://electionfraudremedy.com/

I don't know anything more about this other than watching / listening to the video. Sounds interesting.

 

[opinionatedfool]

Does Ron know he has a new campaign staff ?

I don't get the whole "taking over the campaign thing. What do they mean? Are they taking over the actual campaign or just metaphorically?

 

[CPUd]

I don't get the whole "taking over the campaign thing. What do they mean? Are they taking over the actual campaign or just metaphorically?

They claim they are forming an Executive Committee

 

[opinionatedfool]

They claim they are forming an Executive Committee

Lol, whatever that means

 

[No1butPaul]

Less than 24 hrs. and more than 14,000 views, yet the msm is silent...it is deafening...we can't report this because we have covered up everything else and couldn't explain it to our viewers/readers. Keeping them honest doesn't apply to us or the RNC.

 

[muh_roads]

They said they are taking over the campaign "unofficially" and something to the effect of "whether they like it or not". They firmly believe the Paul campaign was hijacked to make it fall apart.

Tonight's special edition folks is called "Lawyers who love Alex Jones". I'm not going to put too much faith in this really going anywhere.

 

[Ivash]

Less than 24 hrs. and more than 14,000 views, yet the msm is silent...it is deafening...we can't report this because we have covered up everything else and couldn't explain it to our viewers/readers. Keeping them honest doesn't apply to us or the RNC.

In today's day and age 14,000 views is nothing. Videos with many, many times that get no notice by the media. I'm sure the media would think this is the act of a group of sore losers rather than anything significant, anyways.

 

[JK/SEA]

In today's day and age 14,000 views is nothing. Videos with many, many times that get no notice by the media. I'm sure the media would think this is the act of a group of sore losers rather than anything significant, anyways.

who cares what the media thinks at this point...the main question is, what do you think?

 

[No1butPaul]

who cares what the media thinks at this point...the main question is, what do you think?

I know what I know...like miss daisy

b/t/w - why has everything become a matter of confrontation lately on this forum...
aren't we on the same team? I support Ron Paul and liberty, you?

 

[No1butPaul]

In today's day and age 14,000 views is nothing. Videos with many, many times that get no notice by the media. I'm sure the media would think this is the act of a group of sore losers rather than anything significant, anyways.

for THIS forum, in 24 hrs, that's a lot and my point wasn't that its viral, but we gots us lookers plenty, including media. But this story, as huge as it is, they can't touch it because they have failed to report on a single incident. I guess they are just going to play dumb, like they did with the crash of 08.

 

[devil21]

4 stars now and I agree about "counter productive" people...Had major disagreement with one of them in another thread...

I must have really gotten under your skin.

 

[RDM]

UPDATE:

There are now videos available in 3 parts of the conference call that you can share on your websites, blogs or Facebook, etc. Here they are.



Part 3's my favorite because I'm mentioned as Ron from PA.

 

[JK/SEA]

I know what I know...like miss daisy

b/t/w - why has everything become a matter of confrontation lately on this forum...
aren't we on the same team? I support Ron Paul and liberty, you?

uh..who rattled your cage?...is your name Ivash?...gtfo..

 

[presence]

Cliff's Notes:

A decision has been made to take over the RP campaign without permission: A people's mutiny. We are forming a lawyers committee and we will no longer tolerate injustice.

There was foul play, significant fraud, and misconduct.
Romney will be stripped of all delegates.
Ron paul will get the nomination.
The GOP "club" has violated Title 42 US Section 1971-1974 Voting Rights Law.
100's of lawyers have signed up.
We are accusing the Romney campaign of organized criminal acts including: altering ballots, rigging voting machines, etc.
Binding delegates is illegal.
There are numerous delegate affidavids attesting to fraud.
There is an extremely well founded legal position.


The case will be heard before the convention.

Richard Gilbert & Associates, 950 W 17th St Ste C D & E, Santa Ana, CA 92706
Telephone: (714) 667-1038
The actual case number is "8:12-CV-00927"
9th Circuit Court in California

106 page PDF of case as filed: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B42o0yg7D7tcMHhweFllclkxT0U/edit?pli=1

Short and skinny pages 16-18 and 25-29



Check this link to post 158 by Barrex for more info:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...Paul-Lawsuit&p=4495638&viewfull=1#post4495638

3 piece audio with graphics at post 212:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...Paul-Lawsuit&p=4497950&viewfull=1#post4497950

More info at:

www.ronpaulgrassrootsrevolution.com
www.weareronpaul.com
www.realgrassrootsrevolution.com


RDM can we get an updated op with some of this pertinant info?

 

[Badger Paul]

Bump...I love mutinies.

 

[No1butPaul]

...gtfo..

??? I haven't a clue what is your problem...isn't there another place, outside this thread, where you can direct your hostilities. Thank you.

 

[TrishW]

The case will be heard before the convention.

That is very good news!


So are we sure the case will be heard and not simply dismissed?

 

[RDM]

The case will be heard before the convention.

That is very good news!


So are we sure the case will be heard and not simply dismissed?

I am not a lawyer, but maybe someone with legal experience wants to weigh in on this they could. IMO, the overwhelming evidence, over 150 sworn testimonies and affidavits and more coming in daily, already precidented case law pertaining to this case and statutes and laws in our favor, I believe there is less than 1% chance this case gets dismissed.

 

[tod evans]

The case will be heard before the convention.

So are we sure the case will be heard and not simply dismissed?

This is entirely up to the judge.