CTRattlesnake
Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2011
- Messages
- 1,240
Well that was fun while it lasted
Will the results be announced tonight?
I know the Republican party of Iowa is going to decide on March 10 whether to includes the results in the final tally, but it doesn't really matter what they decide because we have the Internet... I'm assuming there will be some reporters present who can find out what the results are.
So +83 for Ron Paul against Mitt Romney. Good but probably not good enough!Final count: Paul 163, Romney 80, Santorum 57, Gingrich 4, Undecided 2 #mepolitics
https://twitter.com/#!/BillNemitz
we still get the delegates right?
Stupid Santorum voters.
it's notSo +83 for Ron Paul against Mitt Romney. Good but probably not good enough!
what about the 20,000 in NV?I think we ought to be more frustrated with the 90 voters who said they were going, but didn't show up.
I think we ought to be more frustrated with the 90 voters who said they were going, but didn't show up.
Washington County will be counted.
What is unclear is whether the other post 2/11 caucuses will count.
I assume that the results going forward will be well documented, and announced. The question is, will they count ALL votes? Or just Washington?
Unless Paul gets 240 more than Romney, we don't win one version of the count.
But there's the ALL votes scenario, which includes Hancock today, and, most importantly, CASTINE MARCH 3, which I've had my eye on long before the Washington Caucus was postponed. March 3 has been on that schedule for a long time, and if there was close race, the candidate who was behind could expect a messy initial vote count (people are just not as competent as they used to be. This isn't a Maine specific observation, it just really appears that collectively, we're now missing the next rung. ) and would, and rightly so, I think, insist that all the votes be counted, including Castine, and any other caucuses that could be called between now and March 10. Certain towns do have traditions of March caucuses. Why should their votes not count? If they want to cut the baby down the middle they can determine when the town set the caucus date, and when the town did in fact learn that their date was outside of the straw poll window. If they set the date before they found out, it's one, if they set the date after, it's another. But I'd prefer Count ALL Votes.
How much did we lose by if we go from OUR corrected numbers we had before the 'recount'? Because they haven't yet explained how Ron lost votes in some counties and so did undecided.Old Total:
2,269 - Romney
2,032 - Paul
New Total:
2,370 - Romney
2,257 - Paul
We lost by 113.
111 if we want to count the unreported New Portland caucus.