Machine vs Hand - New stats table

Again, wow people!!!

This little chart I made (again, another spur of the moment inspiration) is EVERYWHERE today!

Keep up the good work! Spread it everywhere!

All we want to know is the truth.
 
Nice job with the charts Acmegeek.

These charts are so important and significant this needs to be stickied!
At the least this needs to keep getting bumped to the top!

These discrepancies from the hand counted vote to the machine counted vote are very, very telling.

The powers that be know who they want their candidates to be and they were trying to help.

Clinton would have been done for if she had lost. They definitely helped her......
 
HERE IS THE LINK AGAIN for everyone that hasn't seen the charts:

http://ronrox.com/paulstats.php?

View the Democrats as well, which is more telling than the Republicans in my opinion. We all know they've been wanting Hillary as the candidate for 4 years!

Digg it at the site!! Voter Fraud needs to be stopped in America!
 
Digg this! We need Obama people to see this too! They were also screwed tonight and I'm sure they are just as pissed as we are!!

ht tp://digg.com/2008_us_elections/COMPLETE_New_Hampshire_Primary_Stats_both_GOP_DEM_2
 
Is this right?

When you total the machine versus hand losses for: Huck, Hunter, McC, Paul, Thompson and Other it equals = 18,923.

When you total the gains for Mitt and Gou = 18,924.
 
independentperson08,

Nice of you to join the Ron Paul forums just in time to try to discredit Bev.

She's going to bat for Ron Paul so you should support her....
 
Wentworth - 190 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Giuliani = 9 votes = 4.74%
- Huckabee = 24 votes = 12.63%
- Hunter = 1 votes = 0.53%
- McCain = 62 votes = 32.63%
- Paul = 46 votes = 24.21%
- Romney = 45 votes = 23.68%
- Thompson = 3 votes = 1.58%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%

If only that was our result everywhere

It appears that we've done better in small towns, and I've always thought rural areas were more friendly to a small government message. These results seem to proportionately match Iowa, so my lone question is: Does this mean the vote was rigged in both places, or that we don't give small town voters the credit they deserve?
 
independentperson08,

Nice of you to join the Ron Paul forums just in time to try to discredit Bev.

She's going to bat for Ron Paul so you should support her....
The referenced thread is certainly of value. I offer if up for consideration only.
It's up to those that read it to make their own judgement call against all
the other information available. But it certainly looks like the people at DU
have a strong opinion.
 
BIG BUMP!!!

I just made some more updates to the site and added some explanations and words of wisdom.

There are thousands of people viewing this today!

PM me with any more suggestions. Many of you have given me some great ones!

I'm still going to break down the town size table by machine/hand count.
 
I don't feel like reading ten pages of replies, so if anyone's mentioned this before, sorry.

If you add up all the votes "missing" from the Republicans, the # is EXACTLY the same as the number "added" to Mitt Romney and the ghoul combined.

6371 votes "stolen" from the huckster
+ 243 votes "stolen" from Hunter
+6361 votes "stolen" from the old 100 years
+4974 votes "stolen" from the good Dr.
+ 369 votes "stolen" from Thompson
+ 652 votes "stolen" from Other (Keyes?)
=18970

Candidates who gained votes:

Romney gained 17,990 votes. The ghoul gained 971 votes. add them together to get:

=18970

Thoughts?

Peace,

Tim
 
Last edited:
The effect of having the pluses and minus be equal is simply because the votes all have to add up to 100%. I got caught on that one for a few minutes...

So, the only anomaly here is that some candidates received a LOT more votes in machine counted polls... and others received less...

Like I mention on the site now, what this means exactly remains to be seen pending further investigation, recounts, etc.
 
hold up

I don't feel like reading ten pages of replies, so if anyone's mentioned this before, sorry.

If you add up all the votes "missing" from the Republicans, the # is EXACTLY the same as the number "added" to Mitt Romney and the ghoul combined.

6371 votes "stolen" from the huckster
+ 243 votes "stolen" from Hunter
+6361 votes "stolen" from the old 100 years
+4974 votes "stolen" from the good Dr.
+ 369 votes "stolen" from Thompson
+ 652 votes "stolen" from Other (Keyes?)
=18970

Candidates who gained votes:

Romney gained 17,990 votes. The ghoul gained 971 votes. add them together to get:

=18970

Thoughts?

Peace,

Tim

It's exactly the same on the Democratic side:

Edwards, Gravel, Kucinich, Obama, Richardson = 14,575
Clinton, Other = 14,574

Does this really prove anything?
 
Three candidates benefited from machine counting:

CFR Hillary
CFR Giulliani
CFR Romney

Those are the only three that fared better in the machine counted districts.

Those three are the preferred candidates by the establishment elite in my opinion.

Giulliani received extra votes in my opinion to make sure he did better than Ron Paul.
Hillary received extra votes in my opinion to beat Obama. Obama won by 4 points the HAND COUNTED DISTRICTS!!!!
Romney received extra votes in my opinion to beat McCain. Unfortunately for them McCain had too many votes to overcome.
 
Last edited:
If only that was our result everywhere

It appears that we've done better in small towns, and I've always thought rural areas were more friendly to a small government message. These results seem to proportionately match Iowa, so my lone question is: Does this mean the vote was rigged in both places, or that we don't give small town voters the credit they deserve?

The large towns are where the Diebold Machines are located........
 
Back
Top