Other was detailed earlier in another thread, I'll have to find it or you can. But basically there are about 20 other people who were on the ballots. Maybe not 20, but at least a dozen. Apparently, it only cost $1000 to get on the ballot or something like that...
Machine vs Hand - New stats table
- Thread starter acmegeek
- Start date
Awesome.
It's quite obvious to me that Hillary is the chosen darling and it was rigged for her.
What you've done is very elegant. Thanks!
Question: somebody had a list earlier of all the towns where Ron Paul got zero votes. Was that you?
And, what's with the towns on your list that had no votes for anyone? ghost towns? lol
wow... it is 3:30 AM MST and there are still 80+ people on at any given time on my stats site... and it is literally everywhere now...
Good night for real this time!
LOL It's probably the media sneaking around!
That fox comes here for the truth.
NerveShocker
Member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2007
- Messages
- 1,444
Heh those numbers are fishy.. Romney.. the rich gets a 7% boost using the machines is the worst.. I can't believe they used the proven corruptible Diebold machines. Maybe somehow they'll get caught this time..
SteveMartin
Member
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2007
- Messages
- 2,184
Hillary too, would be more popular among the wealthy older folks in the bigger towns that are all Diebold counted.
Sorry guys. I'd love to be convinced we are on to something, honestly I would. But I am not sure AT ALL that we are...
Sorry guys. I'd love to be convinced we are on to something, honestly I would. But I am not sure AT ALL that we are...
Wealthy older folks are generally living in smaller, upmarket areas/precincts (more square feet/vote = less votes/precinct).
garypatriot
Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2008
- Messages
- 16
The link below is the proof of faulty voting machines and how they can be tampered with! The RP campaighn has known about this for over a year but has ignored it! We should all email the RP campaign and let them know that the people that are funding this campaign want something done now! Ron Paul is not responsible personally, but his campaign is!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Piia...s/vote_fraud_expert_warns_of_nh_chicanery.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Piia...s/vote_fraud_expert_warns_of_nh_chicanery.htm
Jeremiah
Member
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2007
- Messages
- 149
Jeremiah
Member
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2007
- Messages
- 149
Credible
If you are going to lie it is important that the lie be credible. Remember plausible deniability? These people are pros. They know how to cook the books. They have been doing it for hundreds of years. Ron Paul was at 8% on Rasmussen's last poll. This was conducted with 1549 likely Republican voters. If this is true then the other Independent and first time voters should have bumped Dr. Paul's returns by at least 5-7% since Independents in NH are 44% of the electorate. That is my firm belief. It is important for them to knock Ron Paul out early and cause disarray and disappointment among his supporters. What they will not expect is a renewed surge of energy going into the next primaries.
If you are going to lie it is important that the lie be credible. Remember plausible deniability? These people are pros. They know how to cook the books. They have been doing it for hundreds of years. Ron Paul was at 8% on Rasmussen's last poll. This was conducted with 1549 likely Republican voters. If this is true then the other Independent and first time voters should have bumped Dr. Paul's returns by at least 5-7% since Independents in NH are 44% of the electorate. That is my firm belief. It is important for them to knock Ron Paul out early and cause disarray and disappointment among his supporters. What they will not expect is a renewed surge of energy going into the next primaries.
I just posted this to a local forum in MN as well, but here's the scoop guys..
I have a sister living in New Hampshire. She told me that there were little to no RP signs, radio ads, TV ads, or any other sign of support for RP in her area. Very few people near her have even heard of Ron Paul. Other candidates had campaigned in the "bigger" town near hers, but not RP, or anyone speaking for RP. Hence, there are MUCH lower percentage numbers for RP in her area than some others. Hand counted or not. I think it just boiled down to getting the message out, and we failed to do it.
So please spend time getting the message out in the states yet to come, it's probably time better spent.
I have a sister living in New Hampshire. She told me that there were little to no RP signs, radio ads, TV ads, or any other sign of support for RP in her area. Very few people near her have even heard of Ron Paul. Other candidates had campaigned in the "bigger" town near hers, but not RP, or anyone speaking for RP. Hence, there are MUCH lower percentage numbers for RP in her area than some others. Hand counted or not. I think it just boiled down to getting the message out, and we failed to do it.
So please spend time getting the message out in the states yet to come, it's probably time better spent.
Jeremiah
Member
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2007
- Messages
- 149
Welcome to the Saddam voting system. This is obviously why we are in Iraq, to get a handle on how he kept getting elected with 99.99% of the vote. (Just joking) But it is ironic.
Hey people, this will be published by BlackBoxVoting very soon!!!
-----------------------------------------------------
I just whipped this up...
Pretty useful. Does show that Romney seems to have had a pretty big boost in machine counted areas...
http://ronrox.com/paulstats.php
I'm just saying, the data don't lie.
Could be a statistical anomoly, who knows.
Looks like a statistical anomaly to me, right around 25%, like what one would expect if 1 in 5 votes were taken from some candidates and given to another candidate.
Started a new thread to talk about the anomaly and a computer algorithm that would have been used.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=83600
The really odd thing is it is so close to 25% for all four of the candidates that were affected, and only one candidate seemed to get an advantage.
Is there a verification trail to the Machine?
Were they paper ballots that were counted by the Machine?
Or, is the Machine totally just bits in a computer?
How would a recount be done?
Every vote counts
So, there is some weird stuff going on in both the Republican and Democrat Primaries in New Hampshire.
If we can't get the vote right in the Primary, there is no hope for the General Election. This was a major issue in 2000 and ever since. I think Ron Paul could score some very big points with the general public with a recount and a bunch of discussion about fair elections where every vote is counted correctly. Get in right in the Primary and the General election.
So, there is some weird stuff going on in both the Republican and Democrat Primaries in New Hampshire.
If we can't get the vote right in the Primary, there is no hope for the General Election. This was a major issue in 2000 and ever since. I think Ron Paul could score some very big points with the general public with a recount and a bunch of discussion about fair elections where every vote is counted correctly. Get in right in the Primary and the General election.
luvfreedom
Member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2008
- Messages
- 121
Thanks. Has anyone attempted to send Acmegeeks chart to this guy?
Similar threads
