M. Steele New GOP Chairman

[Peace&Freedom]

And a lot of us don't recommend RPF these days because of all the Christian bashing and liberty issue bashing going on here now. But at least there remains freedom here to speak truth to power (the election is over, after all). The freedom to recognize the the disproportionate influence of Israeli hypernationalism in the establishment media is a liberty issue, whether Paul talks about it or not. Vanity Fair's lineup of the top 100 most powerful people in America lists Jews in the top 53 positions (and surrogates of the top 53 in most of the remaining), and we are not supposed to notice this?

Exposng the 9/11 false flag fraud and (at least) calling for an independent investigation is a liberty issue, that Paul HAS supported in numerous statements. Jimmy Carter has also just called for a new 9/11 inquiry, but it's kooky for us to even speak of it? Telling the truth about the average voter in America today is also a liberty issue, because the truth simply is, it will be a long time before they are able to be educated enough to even understand what a Paul is talking about when discussing the Fed, the NWO, the IRS, blowback, or other policy matters.

Now is not the time to casually marginalize others for holding their radical liberty views you don't share, while demanding they drop that and get behind your radical liberty issues. The unity needed is one directed towards bonding the entire family that is the liberty movement, not towards allegiance to a particular candidate who may not even run again. Calling members racists and kooks is not what does the cause any good.

 

[BlackTerrel]

And a lot of us don't recommend RPF these days because of all the Christian bashing and liberty issue bashing going on here now. But at least there remains freedom here to speak truth to power (the election is over, after all).

You're not speaking truth to power. You're posting on a message board that gets less visitors than a hip hop forum that I frequent

The freedom to recognize the the disproportionate influence of Israeli hypernationalism in the establishment media is a liberty issue, whether Paul talks about it or not. Vanity Fair's lineup of the top 100 most powerful people in America lists Jews in the top 53 positions (and surrogates of the top 53 in most of the remaining), and we are not supposed to notice this?

Most of these people are Hollywood celebrities. What do they do for Israel? Most of these people don't speak politics. When they do it's issues that everyone agrees on (like feeding hungry children in Africa) so as not to upset their base. People here want to blame Jews for everything. It's an obsession, it's not healthy.

Now is not the time to casually marginalize others for holding their radical liberty views you don't share, while demanding they drop that and get behind your radical liberty issues. The unity needed is one directed towards bonding the entire family that is the liberty movement, not towards allegiance to a particular candidate who may not even run again. Calling members racists and kooks is not what does the cause any good.

I'm not demanding anything. People are free to do what they want. I'm expressing an opinion and saying it's not helpful. As far as what I call people - if they weren't racists and kooks I wouldn't call them that. Most forums I go to ban people for racism, this one doesn't.

 

[speciallyblend]

Lets hope this guy wasnt chosen simply because he is black. If the GOP thinks RACE is the problem, its going to be a LONG 8 years.

more like 20 yrs. the gop is still clueless!!!

 

[The_Orlonater]

Yeah, I like that idea myself.

We have the LP....

 

[speciallyblend]

We have the LP....

yeah they have barr, jumping f for joy(sarcasm)

 

[Gordon LeCompte Bolmer]

Jeffersonian party must have a positive name

How about a Jefferson Party? If we build it will they come?

I like your idea of a Jeffersonian party. The criticism of Brooklyn Red Leg is malapros: of course it would be anti-Federalist, though its name must not imply that its program is limited by simply being "anti," to whatever platform the latter-day "Federalists" happen to be proposing at the moment. With "Jefferson Party," you were off to a good start. Don't let others gainsay you. Go for it!