ronpaulhawaii
Member
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2007
- Messages
- 11,874
...Phonebanking was fun.
priceless...
...Phonebanking was fun.
Spreading the message of liberty isn't a waste even if you lose...maybe it's a waste at $118 vote but not at $5.50/vote.
Pretty dumb comment by Nolan. How many elected libertarians do we have in the federal government? Compared to how many elected libertarian-Republicans we have?
The founder of the frickin' Libertarian party, a party (including both the main party and all the candidates that have ran under its label) that has taken God knows how much money in its nearly forty year existence and won put up a gigantic goose egg when it comes to numbers of House and Senate seats won, Governorships and of course the White House. A party that peaked in presidential runs thirty years ago in 1980 with a whooping 1.1% of the vote.
Good grief.
What about $6.1/vote? Is $17.4 per vote wasteful? Is $70/vote?
A political campaign has to be about the least efficient way to educate the public.
True, but sending it to LP candidates is even worse.
The founder of the frickin' Libertarian party, a party (including both the main party and all the candidates that have ran under its label) that has taken God knows how much money in its nearly forty year existence and put up a gigantic goose egg when it comes to the number of House and Senate seats won, Governorships and of course the White House. A party that peaked in presidential runs thirty years ago in 1980 with a whooping 1.1% of the vote.
Good grief.
No, at over $10,000 per student per year, I would say our public education system is far more inefficient.
Does that apply to anyone who sent Ron Paul money in 1988 when he ran as a Libertarian?
She spent not twice, but about eight times what Peter spent.
Didn't she spend $22 million and Peter about $3 million? I think Nolan's math is wrong.
But clearly, sending money to Schiff's campaign was a colossal waste of resources.