Libertarian National Convention

mysticgeek

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2008
Messages
652
Is anyone paying attention to this? Dr. Paul has gotten several honorable mentions during candidate's speeches.

Also, I find this very educational.
 
I woke up just ~30 minutes ago. I thought it ended around noon (EST) so I didn't turn it on.

Thanks.
 
mmm... they were just covering it on cnn.com live video ... but now they are covering international news.

I believe it is also on Cspan
 
mmm... they were just covering it on cnn.com live video ... but now they are covering international news.

I believe it is also on Cspan

Yep, it's been Libertarian weekend on CSPAN :rolleyes:

WTF is this "I'm nominating Mike Gravel on principle" nonsense coming from Jingo?
 
WTF is this "I'm nominating Mike Gravel on principle" nonsense?

I was wondering the same thing. Isn't that dude who nominated him, also running for President? :confused:

Uh... Gravel. I've seen it all now. A socialist trying to get the Libertarian nomination.
 
just tuned in - gravel is talking
what happened so far- and who looks to be the likely nominee?
 
I can't believe that someone voted for the Pat Act can take the nomination. Won't have my vote!

Barr has CHANGED...honestly changed. You can hear it when he talks...he's seen the light. Not unlike most of you, I'm sure some of you never knew better before hearing Ron speak. You didn't know what real free trade was, etc etc. I trust Barr. I think he's a good man and a good vehicle for the message...he's learned from his mistakes.
 
He admitted it was a mistake.

Not even that, but he never even supported it as a permanent law in the first place; there was supposed to be a length clause, and certain sections were to be removed.

He was one of the few in congress who even read it.
 
hmm - people just paraded in with barr signs and the crowd started booing
 
Not even that, but he never even supported it as a permanent law in the first place; there was supposed to be a length clause, and certain sections were to be removed.

He was one of the few in congress who even read it.

True, but he shouldn't have voted for it at all.
 
Back
Top