Levin Rails Paul....AGAIN

Being a Zionist doesn't necessarily mean you have to be involved in Iraq.
 
Irrelevant. Dr. Paul doesn't use that language.

And not all Zionists are of the Jewish faith. Please do more research on the political Zionist movement before you come out and call someone an 'anti-Semite' or claim they are bashing the Jewish faith.

Have you ever heard of Khazaria? The Khazarians were more related to the Turkic Mongols. They emigrated (the correct term is more like driven) out of Khazaria when Genghis Khan made his sweeping reign westward across this region of the continent.

There are numerous books written on the subject. A really good and well researched one to start with is called, 'The Thirteenth Tribe'.

http://www.amazon.com/Thirteenth-Tr...bs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1201237676&sr=8-1

Face it. As many of you know we have been continually lied to about so many subjects, it's nearly impossible for someone who doesn't really pay attention to really know where to start.

Quote from 'A Foreign Policy of Freedom'

'Our hatred is driven by artificially generated fear. The propaganda of the neoconservatives and the Christian Zionists makes every citizen of Iraq, no matter how innocent, a potentially hated enemy combatant. No sympathy is expressed even for the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi Christians forced to flee to Syria to escape the chaos. Christian leaders who promote this war seem callous and cruel as they anticipate and welcome the coming of Armageddon.'
 
Last edited:
So soldiers from Iraq find the time to call this guy rather than their wives, families, pastors, etc? On whose phone? Is he allowed to make calls to American talk radio programs or is he breaking rules?

I have always doubted these stories.
 
That's great news! Maybe we can win the Iraq war just in time to enter a 2nd great Depression here at home. IT will all be worth it, I'm sure of it. /Sarcasm

I propose we refer to it as the Greatest Depression. It sounds more upbeat, I think we can get the country to rally behind it. It would also go nicely Obama's "Change" mantra.
 
Ok, I know this is exactly what I should be expecting, however this truly made me angry. Today, Mark Levin had a soldgier call in from Iraq to inform everyone that their mission is going well and that we are "winning" whatever that means. After that caller, Levin went on to say that we can win the war in Iraq and that all of the republicans WITH THE EXCEPTION OF RON PAUL can lead us to victory. I was so mad after this as Ron Paul would actually save our troops and protect our country from any foreign enemies far better than any neonut or demon crat.

(1) He mentioned Ron Paul... free air time
(2) Mark Levin is so far out there, he spends too much time talking to his dogs. A bad word from Levin is not the same as Hannity or Rush trash talking Paul because NO ONE respects Levin!
 
I think the definition of "winning" in Iraq is that we reach a point when our troops can come home? Hmm.. so.. the goal in Iraq is to bring the troops home. Sounds like Ron Paul's position is to "win" in Iraq. BRILLIANT!!!
 
The objective in Iraq is unclear at best: do better. When we have done better... the objective will be to... do better. Winning is a meaningless word in the context of this war. We can keep doing better until the rivers flow with chocolate, and still be 'winning'.
 
Back
Top