Leftist SPLC Publishes Patriot Hit List

[pcosmar]

look I'm sorry i want to stop terrorist attacks okay? I 'm very sorry.

Obviously there is no possible way to prevent acts like OK city. it can't be done. we have no choice but to accept our governments foreign policy results. we should immediately stop spending any money on that and put it towards different welfare/warfare items. I've seen the light

The US Government Staged the OKC bombing.
How do you plan to prevent that?

Coverup in Oklahoma

 

[lester1/2jr]

amy- I'm saying you are too much of an ideologue to do what is obvious to anyone. you can't just always give liberty as your answer as with traffic lights and baseball, you have to have OTHER measures in place.

even if we were to in some miracle of miracles adopt a non moronic foreign policy, we would still have to have some security in place.

if you practice military manuvers in the woods and have a website saying "we are going to kill you" you have to expect some blowback from society.

 

[tremendoustie]

yeah because you probably live in snoresville flyover country where nothing happens. I live in on the east coast where alot of these nuts operate. drive through the big dig in boston sometime you'll see it's not going to take much to bring that thing down. then the economy goes down with it. it's worth taking the time to prevent as it is bad rather than good when terrorism occurs

Then I suggest you donate your own money towards this cause, and start a fund for others to do so. If you don't want to pay for it, and you're too scared to live on the east coast, move to "snoresville".

I don't suggest you mug everyone in snoresville to pay for your security projects.

 

[tremendoustie]

I'm asking a simle question: why have traffic lights? why not let people arrive at the decision of when to stop and go by working it out among themselves without having their paychecks stolen from to pay for state light fascism?

just a question. got an answer?

Yep, roads should be built using voluntary, rather than coersive means, like they used to be.

Here's an article on it: [URL]http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/klein.majewski.turnpikes[/URL]

A book:
[URL]http://books.google.com/books?id=jmLzWJ3qRNEC&pg=PT7&dq=privatizing+roads&lr=&cd=2#v=onepage&q=privatizing%20roads&f=false[/URL]

Another book:
[URL]http://books.google.com/books?id=sYAxKrpSjOsC&printsec=frontcover&dq=street+smart&cd=1#v=onepage&q=&f=false[/URL]

 

[tremendoustie]

I want the government to protect me against another 9/11 or OK city.

I'd be willing to pay someone for effective security. The government's the last place I'd look for it, however.

Your dollar would go a lot farther if you formed a private security firm.

 

[tremendoustie]

do you think our government should ignore potential terrorist threats?

Well, really, they should give the money back to the people, and let the people decide how they want to use their resources to address potential terrorist threats.

Barring that, I suppose it depends what you mean by "potential terrorist threats". If a person is almost finished building a bomb and has the stated intent to detonate it, I have no problem with them (or anyone) stopping that person.

Most of the time the government goes after political enemies, commits or creates terrorism itself, or otherwise absues the privacy rights and liberties of millions of peaceful individuals.

 

[michaelwise]

Maybe we should post our own communist hit list.