Lawyers for Ron Paul LIVE NOW!!!!!!!!

We're just listening to it and saying wow. I would love to see all they have. That wow would probably turn into a OMG.

And we've been suspecting some of this stuff for awhile now, imagine to someone who had no idea, it would almost be too hard to believe..
 
As in Mossad?

I dont know, it was litterally as I described it, and I only listened for two segments after that and it waa never mentioned again. I thought she was the lawyer doing all the original Obama birth certificate stuff?
 
I dont know, it was litterally as I described it, and I only listened for two segments after that and it waa never mentioned again. I thought she was the lawyer doing all the original Obama birth certificate stuff?

Perhaps they thought that wasn't ready for prime time when it came out of her mouth. Very touchy thing to mention Israel and our politics in the same sentence.
 
Wow. Just.... wow. This is kind of awesome. Is it bad that I think that? But yeah, this is exciting stuff.
 
Perhaps they thought that wasn't ready for prime time when it came out of her mouth. Very touchy thing to mention Israel and our politics in the same sentence.


...added to the fact that it was mentioned as they were going into commercial break, and never again during the broadcast, to my knowledge. It was really weird. The context of it was that they did not want to have anything to do with her, and that she meant there may be Israeli involvement in all of this. I dunno, it's really been puzzling me since I went to bed last night.
 
Dr. K will be featuring Lawyers for Ron Paul's own Jerry Davis and Arizona Delegate, Pepper Draper on his RBN radio show at 8-10 PST tonight.

Can you please describe further? I am a RBN member and have access to their archived shows but I cannot find any host named Dr. K or similar... further, their schedules are all listed as Central Standard Time and when I convert to PST I find no show at all that is 2 hours in length listed at, or near, that time slot. Thanks in advance!
 
If they prove election fraud what does this mean for the convention?

They'd have to rush out a case and prove intentional fraud on behalf of the RNC.

Most likely this will mean nothing- they'll have to have a large and irrefutable amount of evidence if they want to get a verdict quickly. Most people will also just see this as sour grapes, though in the next few days we will know how the Democrats try and spin this (if they don't touch it at all it'll likely be because there isn't anything there).

Regardless if this lawsuit ever sees a sufficient amount of light (and by that I mean media coverage) the Republican Party will never forgive Libertarianism, or the Pauls. I know most people here are completely okay with that, though. It'll be interesting to see how Ron Paul reacts to it.
 
Can you please describe further? I am a RBN member and have access to their archived shows but I cannot find any host named Dr. K or similar... further, their schedules are all listed as Central Standard Time and when I convert to PST I find no show at all that is 2 hours in length listed at, or near, that time slot. Thanks in advance!

I don't know what more to tell you. I'm not a paying member of RBN. Last night @ 11 pm EST, the show was broadcasted live @ the link in my first post. A few of us were listening to it together here on the forum. If you're a member of RBN, email or contact them for more info.
 
They'd have to rush out a case and prove intentional fraud on behalf of the RNC.

Most likely this will mean nothing- they'll have to have a large and irrefutable amount of evidence if they want to get a verdict quickly. Most people will also just see this as sour grapes, though in the next few days we will know how the Democrats try and spin this (if they don't touch it at all it'll likely be because there isn't anything there).

Regardless if this lawsuit ever sees a sufficient amount of light (and by that I mean media coverage) the Republican Party will never forgive Libertarianism, or the Pauls. I know most people here are completely okay with that, though. It'll be interesting to see how Ron Paul reacts to it.

The Republican Party hates us now. They hired rent-a-goons who broke a man's fingers. (not to mention the organized lying, cheating and stealing) I don't know what more they have to do to prove it.
 
The Republican Party hates us now. They hired rent-a-goons who broke a man's fingers. (not to mention the organized lying, cheating and stealing) I don't know what more they have to do to prove it.

The rent-a-goons scandal (which it certainly was) could not have been an event organized by anyone with any semblance of a brain- it made bad PR, a legal mess, and other issues. While there are definitively some members of the RNC with questionable intellects, there are others that would recognize that as being a truly unfortunate outcome- thus it was almost certainly the actions of a local 'overachiever' rather than a conspiracy.

As for the rest, I don't believe in the vote-flipping theories, and the 'outright cheating' in the conventions has been a common accusation of both sides against each other (Santorum's group recently condemned Paul's group of it in Iowa, for instance). The main reason being that the delegation process has informally changed throughout the years, and some people are playing with the informal rules while others follow the formal rules. I fully expect this discrepancies to be solved within the next ten years and the delegate convention process to be changed dramatically.

That being said the Republican Party doesn't hate you- it wants your votes and has no problem with people that are libertarian within its party (Rand Paul for instance). It certainly doesn't trust you guys, however, and that distrust will deepen into outright rejection if this lawsuit gets a lot of media coverage or goes viral (otherwise everyone will just forget this ever happened, even if it does go to court). And while you guys think time is on your side, they think the same: with Ron Paul retiring there is no obvious leader of the movement, and movements without leaders tend to fall apart given time.
 
The rent-a-goons scandal (which it certainly was) could not have been an event organized by anyone with any semblance of a brain- it made bad PR, a legal mess, and other issues. While there are definitively some members of the RNC with questionable intellects, there are others that would recognize that as being a truly unfortunate outcome- thus it was almost certainly the actions of a local 'overachiever' rather than a conspiracy.

As for the rest, I don't believe in the vote-flipping theories, and the 'outright cheating' in the conventions has been a common accusation of both sides against each other (Santorum's group recently condemned Paul's group of it in Iowa, for instance). The main reason being that the delegation process has informally changed throughout the years, and some people are playing with the informal rules while others follow the formal rules. I fully expect this discrepancies to be solved within the next ten years and the delegate convention process to be changed dramatically.

That being said the Republican Party doesn't hate you- it wants your votes and has no problem with people that are libertarian within its party (Rand Paul for instance). It certainly doesn't trust you guys, however, and that distrust will deepen into outright rejection if this lawsuit gets a lot of media coverage or goes viral (otherwise everyone will just forget this ever happened, even if it does go to court). And while you guys think time is on your side, they think the same: with Ron Paul retiring there is no obvious leader of the movement, and movements without leaders tend to fall apart given time.

/me laffs

Of course it has no problem with my vote...as long as it is for the anointed ones. It seems to have a big issue with my RP vote. And what is this "you guys"?
 
Last edited:
Something about she contacted LFRP and offered her services unsolicited, quipped about how she operates out of Tel Aviv, and "that's how deep this thing goes", something to that effect. It was strange. Music started playing and broke to commercial.

What? Are you saying she was on the show with Lawyers for Ron Paul? THAT is not a good thing if true. Not a good thing at all. Pls tell me I am misunderstanding this.
 
What? Are you saying she was on the show with Lawyers for Ron Paul? THAT is not a good thing if true. Not a good thing at all. Pls tell me I am misunderstanding this.

She was NOT on the show. Something was mentioned she tried to contact Lawyers for Ron Paul to offer help and it sounded like they were not interested.
 
Can you please describe further? I am a RBN member and have access to their archived shows but I cannot find any host named Dr. K or similar... further, their schedules are all listed as Central Standard Time and when I convert to PST I find no show at all that is 2 hours in length listed at, or near, that time slot. Thanks in advance!

Dr. K. Was just sitting in for the regular show host, whose name unfortunately I don't remember...

It was definitely on from 10PM-Midnight Central time
 
She was NOT on the show. Something was mentioned she tried to contact Lawyers for Ron Paul to offer help and it sounded like they were not interested.

Phew! They need to stay as far away as possible from her. Not surprised she "offered her services" and tried to get into the operation.
 
/me laffs

Of course it has no problem with my vote...as long as it is for the anointed ones. It seems to have a big issue with my RP vote. And what is this "you guys"?

I myself am not a Ron Paul supporter- to include myself with your number would be both wrong and presumptuous. By 'doesn't mind your vote' I meant that they view you as much more likely voters for them than, say, African Americans. That means that any distrust they have of libertarians is tempered by their desire for your vote, something which doesn't happen for several other groups.
 
It would be wonderful if some of our $850,000 money bomb went towards these lawyers.

Yeah, NOT GONNA HAPPEN. R.P. is distancing himself from this as much as possible. ANY of those funds making their way to this case would only serve discredit him.
 
I myself am not a Ron Paul supporter- to include myself with your number would be both wrong and presumptuous. By 'doesn't mind your vote' I meant that they view you as much more likely voters for them than, say, African Americans. That means that any distrust they have of libertarians is tempered by their desire for your vote, something which doesn't happen for several other groups.

OK, but you need to get out more. Ron Paul attracts far more people to his ideas than just the libertarian. The Beast has morphed and now includes people of all races and ages, who are tired of wars, big government intrusion, and the destruction of our Constitution.

We will no longer be controlled, put-down, or ignored. We will not conform to your ideas, it is you who must change. We will win! We always win! Go back and tell "them" that.
 
Back
Top