Kucinich faces challenges at home

cindy25

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
6,817
In the midst of a long-shot campaign for president, Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich (D-Ohio) is finding himself with a newfound challenge at home.

Joe Cimperman, a popular 37-year-old Cleveland city councilman, announced Tuesday that he will be running against Kucinich in the Democratic primary for his House seat next March, giving the six-term congressman his first serious and politically experienced challenger since he was first elected in 1996.

Cimperman will now join a fairly crowded field of Democratic challengers. Kucinich is already facing two other primary opponents in Rosemary Palmer, an anti-war activist whose son died in the Iraq war, and nonprofit executive Barbara Anne Ferris, who ran against him last year.

Cimperman represents Cleveland’s downtown ward in the city council.

In an interview with Politico, Cimperman argued that Kucinich’s presidential campaigns have distracted him from paying attention to his constituents back in Cleveland.

“It’s time the 10th District has a representative who is focused on the needs of the community,” said Cimperman. “I’ve been a Clevelander my whole life. I know how to get things done, full time, 24/7. I think that’s the representation this district deserves.”

In his kickoff announcement, Cimperman also cited Kucinich’s vote against SCHIP legislation expanding federally funded health care for children — Kucinich argued it didn’t go far enough — as a potential issue in the campaign.

“You can’t make the perfect the enemy of the good,” Cimperman said.

Cimperman also would be in a strong position to raise sizable funds for the election, given his past relationships with well-heeled donors from downtown Cleveland.

Cimperman’s entry into the race has also raised speculation in Cleveland political circles that Kucinich might be considering retirement.

“The question is now: Is the congressman running for reelection or not? I don’t think Councilman Cimperman would have entered this race without expecting the congressman not to run for reelection,” said Palmer’s campaign manager, Anthony Fossaceca.

The filing date to qualify for the ballot is less than a month away (Jan. 4), and Fossaceca said there wasn’t any sign that Kucinich’s campaign was distributing petitions.

The primary is scheduled for March 4.

Kucinich didn’t raise any money for his congressional campaign last quarter and has only $3,850 remaining in his House campaign account. He has $327,000 in his presidential campaign account, which he can transfer for his reelection bid.

Kucinich spokeswoman Natalie Laber declined to comment on whether the congressman would be running for reelection but issued a statement accusing Cimperman of being beholden to “corporate interests” and not living within the district borders.

“Voters should know that he is the candidate of downtown Cleveland corporate interests. And he brags about how much money he raises from Big Business,” said Laber. “But worse than that, he doesn’t live in the district. I guess his Big Business sponsors are so confident they can buy the election that their candidate doesn’t even have to live in the district.”

Cimperman said he lives “several blocks” outside the district lines and added that he grew up within the district. He is not required by state law to live in the district in order to run for the seat.

In the past, Kucinich has praised Cimperman’s record on the city council. In a 1999 Cleveland Plain Dealer article, Kucinich praised Cimperman for being “passionately involved in his community.”

“He’s an activist, and an activist approach is necessary in order to catalyze the progress of people you represent,” he told the paper.

Cimperman has been a vigorously liberal voice in his 10-year tenure on the city council. He has recently opposed the building of a Wal-Mart in Cleveland, arguing that it would hurt the city’s independent grocers. And he has supported measures to ensure the availability of affordable housing in Cleveland.

If Kucinich runs for reelection, the presence of Palmer and Ferris could dilute Cimperman’s share of the anti-Kucinich vote. But Palmer and Ferris haven’t shown much fundraising strength to date — Palmer raised $48,000 last quarter, and Ferris raised only $15,880.

Cimperman said he is confident he will be able to raise enough funds to mount a serious challenge and believes that Kucinich’s quixotic presidential campaign is even wearing on former Kucinich supporters.

“He’s a good guy; he’s just out of touch,” Cimperman said. “As someone who grew up in Cleveland, you never forget where you came from. And I think Dennis has forgotten where he came from.”
 
In an interview with Politico, Cimperman argued that Kucinich’s presidential campaigns have distracted him from paying attention to his constituents back in Cleveland.

The same excuse every opponent gives when challenging a presidential candidate.
 
yep, people hate Kucinich in cleveland... so this shouldn't be too hard

Honestly, Kucinich doesn't have bad idea for a non-profit, but they'd be horrible for the government to implement

I think he'd best start a non-profit and just spreading his ideas in the private sector like Al Gore did, I don't like Al Gore, but he made a lot more change in the Private sector than he did running for office.

Al Gore is the perfect arguement for the free market :)
 
I think Kucinich will do fine. Especially after initiating that Cheney impeachment bill.
 
no, trust if you mention Kucinich in front of someone from cleveland, they get pissed, he is seriously disliked over there, I know people from Cinnci who like them, but it's cause he wasn't their senator and they are uber socialist.

Your typical democrat are usually closet paleoconservatives, they just equate republican with neo-con abuses so they get it all wrong.
 
ralph nader brought down the wrath of the gore + kerry people for his
tenacity. it would be a shame if kucinich's seat goes to a hack from his
own party. this again reminds me of the uphill fight ron paul now has...
 
Kucinich needs to go.

Why? So Ron Paul will lose another ally in congress? The only issue Kucinich is TOTALLY wrong on is gun control. Well Ron Paul can find enough similar votes on guns. But when it comes to opposing things like the Patriot Act and Homeland inSecurity it's usually just Ron Paul, Dennis Kucinich and a handful of others. Kucinich even recently came out against the federal reserve! If Kucinich loses do you think a conservative republican will get his seat? Or will we get another "impeachment is off the table - give me some popcorn as I watch the torture tapes" Pelosi clone? My bet is on the Pelosi clone.

Regards,

John M. Drake
 
I agree. I'd like to see him gone.

Perhaps you also like the national ID card, the federal reserve, state sanctioned torture, Dick Cheney, domestic wiretapping and everything else that Dennis Kucinich has worked with Dr. Paul against. If Kucinich loses he will be replaced by a Joe Lieberman warhawk socialist democrat. Part of the reason Kucinich is in trouble is that he had the guts to stand up and call for a recount in New Hampshire, creating political cover for Ron Paul to stay above the fray. A Kucinich loss would be a sad day indeed.

Regards,

John M. Drake
 
Kucinich is a fraud and he in no way represents this movement. He's disliked in his district and for good reason. I'll be happy when he's gone. A Kucinich loss would be a happy day indeed.
 
Kucinich is a fraud and he in no way represents this movement. He's disliked in his district and for good reason. I'll be happy when he's gone. A Kucinich loss would be a happy day indeed.

Of course he doesn't represent THIS movement. He represents his OWN movement! And he has Ron Paul's friendship and respect for good reason. They've worked together a lot on issues of common interest. Should he lose Ron Paul loses an ally. Maybe you're cool with that. I'm not. If you'd prefer a Joe Lieberman type candidate to a Dennis Kucinich then maybe you don't represent this movement.

Regards,

John M. Drake
 
Kucinich is a big government, soicalist, party shill! He's no better than Obama or Hillary! Why did he vote for the Iraq Liberation Act? TELL ME WHY HE VOTED FOR IT!!!!!! If you think that having a big government, socialist flip flopper in office is good for us, then maybe you don't represent this movement.
 
Kucinich is a big government, soicalist, party shill! He's no better than Obama or Hillary! Why did he vote for the Iraq Liberation Act? TELL ME WHY HE VOTED FOR IT!!!!!! If you think that having a big government, socialist flip flopper in office is good for us, then maybe you don't represent this movement.

It's good, as much as Ron's platform, as long as they follow the constitution and are honest.

Kucinich is a practical man, good man.
 
Kucinich doesn't follow the Constitution. He likes big government social and welfare programs. He also doesn't adhere to the 2nd amendment. Kucinich is no Ron Paul and anyone who supports him is no Ron Paul supporter, that's for sure.
 
Perhaps you also like the national ID card, the federal reserve, state sanctioned torture, Dick Cheney, domestic wiretapping and everything else that Dennis Kucinich has worked with Dr. Paul against. If Kucinich loses he will be replaced by a Joe Lieberman warhawk socialist democrat. Part of the reason Kucinich is in trouble is that he had the guts to stand up and call for a recount in New Hampshire, creating political cover for Ron Paul to stay above the fray. A Kucinich loss would be a sad day indeed.

Regards,

John M. Drake

Um, we will probly see all that stuff anyway. Kucinich is the one person standing in those way of those things? That's the tone of your post. He's wrong on a whole host of issues other than gun control. He likes civil liberties, to an extent, and he also likes a lot more government.

He is right on a few issues yes.

I wouldn't say I'd like to see him gone, but a Kucinich style American society scares me as much as the perfect neocon society.
 
Back
Top