They are economically opposite. The only similarity I see is ending occupation of other countries.
In simplest terms Kucinich is a collectivist and Paul is an individualist. That's the big difference. That's the paradox. I would put Paul in charge and make Kucinich his vice-president.
They are in principled agreement on foreign policy. On domestic policy I would bring in Lyndon LaRouche to advise the Paul presidency on financial/monetary and physical economic issues and strategies.
I would first demand of LaRouche an apology and a written retraction of his anti-Spanish American, pro-Jewish sick and sickening points of view.

Last edited: