Know what our Movement needs? More WOMEN!!

Scofield said:
The perfect girl:

Cute
Supports Ron Paul
Smokes weed, but isn't a moocher. She actually has a piece and buys her own herb.

I would love to find a girl like that. But, sadly, I think they are a mythical bunch...kinda like the unicorn.
Click to expand...

+1

I'll find 2 out of 3 but not all 3 of those. My ex was almost there but she only kinda liked Ron Paul and she was a moocher. Just for being that close I almost married the woman.
 
Nate said:
+1

I'll find 2 out of 3 but not all 3 of those. My ex was almost there but she only kinda liked Ron Paul and she was a moocher. Just for being that close I almost married the woman.
Click to expand...

Never involve the State if you want to get married. Yes, that is my humble opinion.

(you'll thank me later)
 
One possibility is to promote Congresswoman Michele Bachmann as a leader on "women's issues" from a liberty point of view. She (or other lady Revolution candidate who actually wants to run for major office) could be 'our' Palin to push.
 
We definitely need more women joining our movement, especially beautiful, intelligent ones like Shelly ;)
 
After seeing threads on this forum that people debated the merits of Women's Rights and why it was bad..I think you're going to have a lot of trouble attracting the smart intelligent freethinking women to our movement.
 
Vessol said:
After seeing threads on this forum that people debated the merits of Women's Rights and why it was bad..I think you're going to have a lot of trouble attracting the smart intelligent freethinking women to our movement.
Click to expand...

Let me get this straight:

Because you have seen threads on this site with opinions that offend you, you think that will make it difficult to convince a given woman about the principles of liberty?

Not all people are that narrowminded!

If a woman is intelligent and freethinking, she wouldn't adopt the attitude that posters on an internet forum define the beliefs of some collective.

She would take information from many different sources and come to an opinion not unduly shaped by a few wrong-headed, narrow minded posters.
 
You know what? We do.

And I know exactly how to do it. Catch them on the way out of the Child Protective Services office. At that moment, all their brainwashing will be washed away, and they will be more than receptive.
 
Women spend less time thinking about politics so any movement will have less women.
I propose to cut the weight of their vote in half.

Also I find it appaling that the OP has something like ten reps per post because she has a cute picture.
 
Vessol said:
After seeing threads on this forum that people debated the merits of Women's Rights and why it was bad..I think you're going to have a lot of trouble attracting the smart intelligent freethinking women to our movement.
Click to expand...

Not all women are feminists. I personally don't think feminists make very good libertarians. Way too much emphasis on what "society" is doing and not enough emphasis on personal responsibility.

Also, when I think "smart intelligent freethinking women", I don't think of the Women's Rights movement. Women have all the rights that men do, and in some cases, more. People who call themselves women's rights activists certainly don't have a liberty-oriented definition of rights.

edit:
Just realized I was responding to a 5 year old post, but the point is still a good one.
 
Last edited:
More women in the movement is fine in and of itself, but people who want to synthesize libertarianism with feminism should be treated with suspicion at best. Modern feminists invade movements and subcultures other than their own, and demand that they conform to feminist, social justice warrior narratives. They've done it with the atheist movement, they're doing it with gaming subculture, they're doing it with heavy metal subculture and to some degree they're already trying to do it with libertarianism. If you let them, the third wave will split your movement in half. Cathy Reisenwitz is a perfect example of this. She thinks libertarians need to start "checking their privilege" and be aware of "rape culture" and other assorted nonsense. She's a 3rd wave feminist first and a libertarian second, unlike IFeminists like Wendy McElroy. She's the reason Jeffrey Tucker decried "libertarian brutalists" in favor of "libertarian humanitarians". The divisions the feminist movement will create in the movement are not worth the small increase in numbers.
 
ThePaleoLibertarian said:
More women in the movement is fine in and of itself, but people who want to synthesize libertarianism with feminism should be treated with suspicion at best.
Click to expand...


Welcome to the forum!

Between your avatar, your name, and this post I can tell you're going to throw an interesting twist on the journey.

LOL
 
Good luck with that. I actually did a bit of research on this before.

You're fighting biology not political theory.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

jmdrake
Charlie Kirk getting destroyed in debates
3 4 5
Replies
97
Views
3K
Danke
Danke
Occam's Banana
Red-pilled: Nicole Shanahan on the "Great Reset" - and "Tech Mafia" wives as its "useful idiots"
Replies
3
Views
62
oyarde
O
ClaytonB
Female modesty: first step to ending toxic femininity
Replies
2
Views
44
ClaytonB
ClaytonB
J
US Special Forces Gaza Whistleblower Col. Anthony Aguilar Blows Up "100 Million Meals" Being Delivered, Huckabee
Replies
6
Views
60
unknown
unknown
mtr1979
Can women be pastors?
Replies
6
Views
307
Anti Globalist
Anti Globalist
Back
Top