Justin Amash Will Use Federal Dollars to Protect Transgenderism as President

[ThePaleoLibertarian]

If Amash isn't a libertarian, you aren't either and should be honest about it. You're a run-of-the-mill Republican. For some reason people continue to act as if libertarians are nothing more than a subset of the GOP. Nope, wrong. OMG he said something that Elizabeth Warren also said? Oy vey!
Some libertarian positions appeal to the left, some to the right, some to both and maybe some to neither, but the "socially liberal, fiscally conservative" message appeals to many in the middle and the middle decides elections. That is why libertarians are treated as a scourge to the two party duopoly. Libertarians are a threat to that scamming, mind-controlling, divide and conquer duopoly which forces the middle to choose a side of the controlled duopoly.

Bull. Shit. Fiscally conservative/socially liberal is a myth. It appeals to no one. Fiscally liberal/socially conservative is more popular FFS.

 

[enhanced_deficit]

He's appears to be starting a dangerous political game that could have far reaching implications for both major political parties.

I was thinking he would be more of an educational candidate who if won a place on debate stage could educate more people. But with moves like this, could he cause trouble for both globalist neoconservatives/Israel lobby (right wing) funded GOPA candidate and Iraq war voting Dem candidate?
Not clear if would cause more damage to GOPA wing, former Clinton funding Democrat who had called Obama "totally a champion" and these days identifies as a MAGA Republican, OR good ol conservative Democrat Joe who stood behind Obama for 8 years.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Bull. $#@!. Fiscally conservative/socially liberal is a myth. It appeals to no one. Fiscally liberal/socially conservative is more popular FFS.

Exactly, libertarians have been tricked into failure on purpose and that isn't the only way, wide open borders to allow all the parasites in the world to flood in attracted by the prosperity that liberty creates and then destroy liberty and prosperity is another.

 

[Sammy]

Open Borders or Welfare.

Seems to me most prefer to be restricted/ask permission during their travels, want to distinguish them from us by way of modern tech such as eVerify, National ID and Biometrics, and employ more Federal workers to "crack down".

So, I will continue to preach End the Welfare, which will cost nothing fiscally or loss of liberty.

I support the repeal of the welfare state. But I'm in the minority. About 3% of Americans or less agree with me.
But even if had no welfare state I would be for Immigration restriction.
We need to defend western civilization from other cultures.
Its almost impossible to assimilate people from Latin America,Africa & Muslim Countries.

 

[Sammy]

Transgenderism - I don't want to see it, or hear about it. But I will not infringe upon their natural rights to do what they want.

I agree with you. No special rights only natural rights!

 

[dannno]

Like I said before: Those who sacrifice a tiny bit of liberty for manufactured false-flag fake security, will soon enough feel the full weight and power of Fed.gov.

One of the founders said that.

What if it's Mexico's army? And what if they are stopping large scale child sex trafficking operations?

If I lived in a country where the children were being kidnapped and sent to another country for sex slavery, I might not feel that bad about putting the military on the border, private or otherwise.

 

[PAF]

What if it's Mexico's army? And what if they are stopping large scale child sex trafficking operations?

If I lived in a country where the children were being kidnapped and sent to another country for sex slavery, I might not feel that bad about putting the military on the border, private or otherwise.

So now you want me to entertain “what if” scenarios, and turn the topic to of age of consent, in order to beg fed.gov on my knees to do what ever it takes to fully strip me of my Natural Born rights?

Puhhhhleeeeeease! Give me GD break!!!

 

[dannno]

So now you want me to entertain “what if” scenarios, and turn the topic to of age of consent, in order to beg fed.gov on my knees to do what ever it takes to fully strip me of my Natural Born rights?

Puhhhhleeeeeease! Give me GD break!!!

I'm asking you to entertain reality and increase your individual rights.

See, you are confusing something major here.

You are saying, "don't give up your liberty for safety."

To AF.

Do you realize the fatal flaw of what you just did?

AF never trades liberty for safety.

AF might trade a small amount of liberty for a greater amount of liberty. Which is precisely what is happening here.

I would trade a 40% income tax for a 1% consumption tax. Because it increases my liberty. Most people who believe in liberty would do that to increase their liberty.

Your brain works differently, and I can't wrap my head around it. But I'm not sure I want to. I would prefer more liberty at the end of the day.

 

[Swordsmyth]

I'm asking you to entertain reality and increase your individual rights.

See, you are confusing something major here.

You are saying, "don't give up your liberty for safety."

To AF.

Do you realize the fatal flaw of what you just did?

AF never trades liberty for safety.

AF might trade a small amount of liberty for a greater amount of liberty. Which is precisely what is happening here.

I would trade a 40% income tax for a 1% consumption tax. Because it increases my liberty. Most people who believe in liberty would do that to increase their liberty.

Your brain works differently, and I can't wrap my head around it. But I'm not sure I want to. I would prefer more liberty at the end of the day.

His brain may work just fine, all it would take is for him to have different goals in mind than maximizing liberty.

 

[eleganz]

Its pretty clear why Justin is going hard on all these issues like trans, climate, and open borders. He made a name for himself being one of the most hardcore anti-Trump names so there is a small fanbase on the left, he is capitalizing on it.

Im not gonna knock him on the strategy because you do whatever it takes to gain traction, otherwise why even run? But its just not a good look overall and considering the feedback I'm seeing from liberty peeps, nobody is impressed, except a few here and there who were anti-Trump to begin with. Basically Justin traded support within libertarian community and replaced it with progressives.

End of the day, he will get less votes than Gary "What is Aleppo" Johnson in 2016, this is all but a forgone conclusion.

 

[CCTelander]

His brain may work just fine, all it would take is for him to have different goals in mind than maximizing liberty.

Back to your false accusations against other, better members again, I see. Please stop.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Back to your false accusations against other, better members again, I see. Please stop.

If it walks like a duck, swims like a duck, flies like a duck and quacks like a duck it may be a duck.

 

[CCTelander]

If it walks like a duck, swims like a duck, flies like a duck and quacks like a duck it may be a duck.

In other words, No you have no intention of stopping. Didn't think so. Fuck off then.

While I still do not support bans, I must admit that the air around here was much cleaner while you were serving yours. Sometimes good things do come from less than ideal actions, it seems.

 

[Swordsmyth]

In other words, No you have no intention of stopping. Didn't think so. $#@! off then.

Another duck is heard quacking.

 

[devil21]

Not sure how supporting the tyrannical deep state is libertarian.

It's just funny now how you write that with full on seriousness, while everyone in the White House is a CFR member.



This video is constantly de-ranked by Youtube and has to be reuploaded repeatedly. The guys in the masks are Skull and Bones members from the 50's but the original picture doesn't have the masks. One of them is GHWB.

Bull. Shit. Fiscally conservative/socially liberal is a myth. It appeals to no one. Fiscally liberal/socially conservative is more popular FFS.

No source at all. Looks scientific and clearly has nothing to do with the limited choices and lying rhetoric of both candidates in that election. 90% of "elections" aren't about issues but are instead of about fear of the other candidate.

 

[dannno]

It's just funny now how you write that with full on seriousness, while everyone in the White House is a CFR member.



This video is constantly de-ranked by Youtube and has to be reuploaded repeatedly. The guys in the masks are Skull and Bones members from the 50's but the original picture doesn't have the masks. One of them is GHWB.

Trump attacks Bush after 43rd president offers message of unity
https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/03/politics/george-w-bush-coronavirus-partisanship-trump/index.html

 

[dannno]

Bull. Shit. Fiscally conservative/socially liberal is a myth. It appeals to no one. Fiscally liberal/socially conservative is more popular FFS.

This graph makes no sense, why are all the blue people for shutting down the country and all the red people for re-opening it if the blues are so far down on the authoritarian scale?

 

[acptulsa]

Bull. $#@!. Fiscally conservative/socially liberal is a myth. It appeals to no one. Fiscally liberal/socially conservative is more popular FFS.

Fiscally conservative/socially liberal is the top left corner of that graph. How do you figure it's less popular than fiscally liberal/socially conservative, which is the area you circled? There doesn't seem to be anyone there but Clinton, Trump and their cronies.

 

[devil21]

Fiscally conservative/socially liberal is the top left corner of that graph. How do you figure it's less popular than fiscally liberal/socially conservative, which is the area you circled? There doesn't seem to be anyone there but Clinton, Trump and their cronies.

Does it? I couldn't decipher what the chart even meant to display. I just assumed it was unsourced bs.

 

[acptulsa]

Does it? I couldn't decipher what the chart even meant to display. I just assumed it was unsourced bs.

It is. It could only be the result of exit polling voters who likely don't even know what they are.

It's still doesn't say what ThePaleoLibrarian says it does.